Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$900 $249
SAVE $651

$1798 $1298
SAVE $500

$148 $138
SAVE $10

$2998 $2998
SAVE $click

$1858 $1358
SAVE $500

$1858 $1358
SAVE $500

$3049 $2399
SAVE $650

$3664 $3154
SAVE $510

$998 $998
SAVE $click

$4087 $3088
SAVE $1000

$1597 $1297
SAVE $300

$80 $33
SAVE $46

$1898 $1498
SAVE $400

$600 $400
SAVE $200

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$699 $499
SAVE $200

$400 $270
SAVE $130

$1645 $1345
SAVE $300

$2106 $1476
SAVE $630

$1699 $999
SAVE $700

$180 $100
SAVE $80

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$400 $270
SAVE $130

$1699 $999
SAVE $700

Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB

4/5/6TB Hard Drives: Higher Capacity Boosts Real-World Performance

2014-10-16 updated 2014-10-18 - Send Feedback
Related: hard drive, HGST, how-to, optimization, storage, Toshiba

See Why You Need More Space Than You Need for the reasons why hard drives slow down as they fill up.

Assuming the same rotational rate and similar technology, the fastest storage is on the largest capacity drive, by simple math (rpm, circumference and data density).

Overbuying capacity is not a waste of money: it enhances performance.

However, most users upgrade to a larger drive and throw away its performance gains.

Comparing real-world speed of 4/5/6TB hard drives

Three drives tested: Toshiba 4TB, Toshiba 5TB, Seagate 6TB.

Drives were tested when empty, then partitioning used to simulate capacity utilization of 2TB and 3.8TB.

Hard drive speed should take into account real-world performance, because drives slow down quickly as capacity is used.

For example, when a 4TB drive is mostly full, the real speed on the remaining capacity is considerably slower than the speed when empty. But on a 5TB or 6TB drive, the speed remains much higher.

For any given amount of data storage, the highest capacity drive is fastest (assuming similar drive technology). This principle applies to single drive and to RAID of any kind, though differences may be muted with some variants of RAID. SSDs do not suffer this type of slowdown.

Still, the highest capacity (latest and greatest) drives typically sell for a premium price, and so often the next highest capacity can be the best deal, particularly if capacity utilization is relatively low.

Click for a larger graph.

Hard drive performance vs capacity utilization

Filling 4TB (4000GB) on 4/5/6TB drives

Disktester was used to write 1000 files of 4GB each, for a total of 4000GB / 4TB: disktester fill-volume --xfer 4M (1000 files of 4GB each)

This graph shows the performance for a 4TB volume (partition) on the fast part of each hard drive. The results are clear:

  • All drives have some minor inconsistency in performance.
  • For any capacity utilization, a 5TB or 6TB drive is significantly faster than a 4TB drives.
  • The tested 6TB drive is slightly faster overall than the 5TB drive, but there is very little different until the capacity utilization approaches ~2.8TB (offset 2800 in the graph). Thereafter, the 6TB drive maintains increasingly superior performance.

View large graph.

Hard drive performance vs capacity utilization over 4TB partition (4/5/6TB hard drives)

The 5th terabyte of space

Disktester was used to write 1000 files of 1GB each, for a total of 1000GB / 1TB: disktester fill-volume --xfer 4M (1000 files of 1GB each)

Considering 5TB and 6TB drives, what happens when the drives contain 4TB of data so that a 5th terabyte is now being stored?

The 6TB drive holds up better than the 5TB, showing speeds about 20% faster for reads (generally much more important than writes).

View large graph.

Hard drive performance: 4TB full, 5th terabyte on 5/6 terabyte hard drives

Faster to start

Sometimes a drive is faster to begin with, and that can be a better choice if the capacity utilization is fractional. For example, the 6TB HGST Deskstar NAS outperforms its 8TB HGST Ultrastar He8 sibling for the first ~2.7TB, matches it through ~3.9TB, then falls behind.

Performance across first 6TB of capacity, HGST 8TB Ultrastar He8 vs HGST 6TB Deskstar NAS


View all handpicked deals...

Sony Alpha a7R II Mirrorless Digital Camera (Body Only)
$1798 $1298
SAVE $500 | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__