↝ OWC / MacSales.com... ↜
↝ diglloyd Deal Finder... ↜
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
4TB to 40TB, configure single drives or as RAID-5, RAID-0, RAID-10.
Now up to a whopping 40 Terabytes! TOP PICK
How to Configure Photoshop CS4 for best performance
Related: software, optimization, Software, Photoshop, Optimization
Configuring Photoshop optimally will result in much higher performance with larger files, many files at once and/or long-running actitivies.
Be sure to read the Introduction and Overview page to understand how to gauge Photoshop memory requirements and more.
In this section, we look at ways Photoshop itself can be configured to improved performance:
- Use the right plugins when appropriate (Bigger Tiles and DisableScratchCompress)
- Hide the Histogram panel when you don’t need it.
- Use a striped RAID for the scratch volume.
- Set the Photoshop performance preferences correctly.
- Avoid the Photoshop 32GB memory bug.
- Speed up opening and saving large files.
Use the right plugins PERMALINK
Be clear on this: Adobe’s advice as of January 2009 is stale. Plugins that Adobe either doesn’t enable or even include by default are critical to performance!
$1799 SAVE $200 = 10.0% Apple 13.3" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (Late 2016, Silver) in Computers: Apple Macs
$1599 SAVE $200 = 11.0% Apple 13.3" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (Late 2016, Space Gray) in Computers: Apple Macs
$2149 SAVE $350 = 14.0% Apple 15.4" MacBook Pro Laptop Computer with Retina Display & Fo… in Computers: Apple Macs
$2799 SAVE $300 = 9.0% Apple 15.4" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (Late 2016, Space Gray) in Computers: Apple Macs
$579 SAVE $120 = 17.0% Apple Mac mini 2.6 GHz Desktop Computer (Late 2014) in Computers: Apple Macs
Bigger Tiles is critical
The barefeats.com that same behavior; the culprit seems to be the function, which runs far more slowly without .plugin in particular is absolutely critical to performance in most cases, especially with large files. Using Photoshop CS4 11.0.1, I measured these bizarre results with and without on both a 2.8GHz 2008 Mac Pro and a 2.93GHz 2009 Mac Pro Nehalem. I confirmed with Rob-Art at
Not using Bigger Tiles causes this massive performance hit, which far exceeds performance gains that hardware can provide, particularly on the 2009 Mac Pro Nehalem.
If you are using an older version of Photoshop (CS3, CS2), you might need to also add, which causes Photoshop to allow Mac OS X to use excess memory for caching. Experiment for best results with these older versions.
Shown below are the installed plugins.
Hide the Histogram panel PERMALINK
When running actions or scripts (testing or not), hide the Histogram panel. Hiding it drops the diglloydMedium/Huge benchmark execution time by about 10%. Even in the middle of an multi-step action, Photoshop updates the histogram display after each step, which can be a time-consuming operation, especially with , because it might involve reading from the scratch volume.
Striped RAID for scratch volume PERMALINK
Use a striped RAID for a scratch volume (a partition), consisting of at least two fast hard drives. Three drives are near-optimal, and 4-6 can produce incremental gains. See the Recommended Hardware page for details on drives.
A recommended partition size is 16GB or 32GB per hard drive. The reason is drive speed: see Why you need more space than you need for details. More per hard drive is fine; use enough space for a large enough volume to handle your needs.
Example: for a 4-drive stripe, make a 64GB or 128GB striped volume (partition). Make the volume larger if your scratch size requirements would exceed 80% of the volume capacity. Do not use entire drives: there is no guarantee that the fast side of the drive will be used; use a partition.
Photoshop performance preferences PERMALINK
The preferences discussed here are suitable for any Mac OS X system having 6GB or more of memory, and are often ideal even for 4GB systems, as proven by testing. Systems with 2GB of memory should be adjusted accordingly (and upgraded!).
Here are “freebies” to reduce memory usage and speed operations:
- minimize the length. If you can work with no history, set it to “1”; this makes sense when running actions or scripts repeatedly, where history is not needed. Be sure to set it back to something longer for interactive work;
- consider the number of below. . A setting of 3 - 6 should work well in most cases, with a setting of 4 being best for all-around use (but slightly slower than a level of 3 for some things). More on this
- hide the palette when running actions or scripts.
- Use the right plugins.
This is Photoshop’s Performance preferences dialog. It is shown with benchmarks, but is often better for all-around use, and can be much faster for commands like —it all depends on what operations are being done., which is the fastest for the
OpenGL is shown disabled, because it degrades redraw performance on my system, a herky-jerky redraw that is intolerable. Disabled, it is much smoother and faster. Experiment—it might be worthwhile on other systems and/or might accelerate specific operations. But redraw speed (clicking layers on/off and/or viewing color channels is troublesome on my Mac Pro when enabled (with both the 2006 and 2008 Mac Pro models). Also, Adobe Bridge is completely non-functional with hardware support enabled on a stock 2008 Mac Pro with an ATI Radeon HD 2600!
Note that memory usage might need to be adjusted downwards if you run memory-hungry plugins which need some extra memory set aside for their own use; Photoshop shares the available memory with plugins.
Your particular workflow might influence the optimal number of cache levels, and with some plugins, using diglloyd benchmarks, but might be a better all-around choice for most users. Cache Levels of 5 and 6 can cause preview inaccuracies, so stick with 4 by default.of 4/5/6 might work faster, according to anecdotal reader feedback. A setting of is the fastest for the
Thecommand, for example, runs up to 80% faster using instead of . However, a setting a can be slightly slower than a setting of 3 for other operations. You will have to experiment.
Memory usage and Mac OS X
On Mac OS X, the absolute memory limit is about 3.5GB for a 32-bit application. The 32-bit Photoshop CS3/CS4 allows specifying an amount up to 3GB as a preference, a way of divvying up the memory between itself and plugins (with their unknown memory needs). The 0.5GB differential is simply the amount required for other internal housekeeping, and reserves to prevent sudden and fatal “out of memory” errors; it is not wasted.
Mac OS X does not waste memory that cannot be directly utilized by programs: when Photoshop (or any program) reads or writes to disk, unused memory caches that data, muting any drive performance differences. This is clear from the test results for both the Mac Pro View and MacBook Pro View.
Photoshop CS4 has a 32GB and 48GB memory bug PERMALINK
When the Mac Pro is upgraded from 8GB or 16GB to 32GB of memory, Photoshop actually reduces the maximum memory it will allow. This shows up as slightly degraded performance on the diglloydMedium benchmark. However, on the diglloydHuge benchmark the extra memory used for caching greatly outweighs this minor impact, as compared to 16GB.
A 24GB configuration tried on the 2009 Mac Pro Nehalem shows no issues; the full 3072MB allocation may be specified.
The problem exists on all versions of the Mac Pro through Photoshop CS4 11.0.1. Perhaps Adobe will fix this problem in a future bug-fix release (over a year has passed since I write that, so I give up), and of course the arrival of a 64-bit Photoshop will make the issue moot.
With 24MB it’s OK for Photoshop to use 3072MB — but with 32GB memory, only 2810MB is OK?
Why does a bug like this not get fixed, and quickly? This is with 48GB memory installed (six 8GB modules) in a Mac Pro Nehalem.
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while: 3072MB again!
Not a limitation of Mac OS X—to verify that this is a Photoshop anomaly (bug), I wrote my own 32-bit program to test this issue. I verified that with either a 16GB or 32GB configuration my program could allocate exactly the same amount of memory: 3480MB using 10MB chunks, or 3497MB using 1MB chunks, exactly the same figure with either configuration. So it’s hard to conclude that this Photoshop behavior is anything other than a bug.
Speed up opening and saving large files PERMALINK
Sometimes fast hard drives and ample memory still don’t help—it requires a change in software. Unfortunately, Photoshop CS4 still does not address key usability issues in basic areas, such as opening and saving files.
Opening and saving files is just as slow as in Photoshop CS4 as in CS3. In spite of the now-prevalent 2/4/8 core systems; opening and saving files still runs single-threaded, ignoring the available computing power. Even if this is due to a file format issue that requires single-threaded operation (unlikely), Adobe could have made the save/open operations non-modal so that work could continue on a different image while others are being saved and/or opened.
Uncompressed TIF files do occupy more space, but time is frequently more important the file size.
With single-threaded open/save, Photoshop is “CPU-bound”, meaning that its running time is a function of CPU speed. In other words, if 95% of the time is spent computing, disk I/O that takes zero time can only speed things up by 5%.
Example: opening a 754MB test file took 14 seconds on a 4-way striped RAID, and 18 seconds on a single moderately fast hard drive (on my Mac Pro). The modest improvement reflects the CPU-bound single-threaded operation of Photoshop CS4.
Still, 18 vs 14 seconds is a 20% reduction, pointing out the value of a fast striped RAID, something far more cost effective than (for example) a 3.2GHz machine over a 2.8GHz machine, which offers only a 14% speedup. See How to Configure a Mac Pro.
A 5616 X 3744 pixel file consisting of four 16-bit image layers (pixel layers) was used for this test. This file saves as approximately 722MB uncompressed. This is just one example; the times can be expected to vary in similar ratios, but final compressed file size might vary.
|File Format||Time to save
|File Size zipped later|
|PSD, slow drive (or fast)||48||348.1||n/a|
|TIF: ZIP/ZIP, slow drive (or fast)||59||450.6||n/a|
|TIF/uncompressed, slow drive||7.4||722.1||525.4|
|TIF/uncompressed, 2-drive stripe||3.5||722.1||525.4|
|TIF/uncompressed, 4-drive stripe||3.2||722.1||525.4|
Photoshop is using only one CPU core for the save operation. The save can run only as fast as that CPU core, so hard drive speed has little influence. The 4-way striped RAID used here needs about 2 seconds to save a 722MB file. If that time were reduced to zero, then the 48 second save would still be 46 seconds—effectively the same.
If you must save as PSD or compressed TIF, then your only choice is to get faster machine eg 3.2GHz instead of 2.8GHz. That could cut down a 48 second save to about 42 seconds. Not so great for a $1400 premium.
Note that hard drive speed does matter for saving uncompressed TIF files; the time was cut by 56% in this example. Unfortunately, there is no option to tell Photoshop to not compress PSD files, so if PSD format is mandatory, you’re stuck with poor performance.