All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: photography and

Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Upgrade the memory of your 2020 iMac up to 128GB
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$2998 $2898
SAVE $100

$3049 $2399
SAVE $650

$3508 $2998
SAVE $510

$998 $848
SAVE $150

$3999 $2998
SAVE $1001

$2299 $2299
SAVE $click

$1597 $1297
SAVE $300

$80 $33
SAVE $46

$2299 $2299
SAVE $click

$1898 $1498
SAVE $400

$2799 $2799
SAVE $click

$2299 $2299
SAVE $click

$600 $400
SAVE $200

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$699 $499
SAVE $200

$270 $270
SAVE $click

$1599 $1398
SAVE $201

$2027 $1397
SAVE $630

$1699 $999
SAVE $700

$180 $100
SAVE $80

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$270 $270
SAVE $click

$1699 $999
SAVE $700

OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.

Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!

Mac Pro Energy Savings: What is the Reality?

Congratulations to Apple for a design masterwork (the 2013 Mac Pro) that also cuts energy usage way down (“68 percent less power in idle mode than the previous-generation Mac Pro’).

Saving energy is always a plus and the reduced electricity use here at $.42/KWh or so here in California is highly attractive, but energy usage does not exist in a vacuum. I am speaking of the need for external expansion with everything. Is automobile mileage calculated with all seats and interior ripped out to save weight?

To use a 2013 Mac Pro as a workhorse like the older “less efficient” 2010-2012 models, drives have to be connected, compatibility and expansion boxes connected, etc. These devices have their own power draw, and chances are high that they are substantially less efficient for the same functionality.

For example, it is not efficient to have 3/4/5 power bricks powering a gaggle of devices. It is efficient to have one very high-efficiency power supply making power for the computer, various internal drives, etc.

Moreover, even assuming that the external devices themselves are as power efficient as the Mac Pro (highly unlikely), power bricks can be “vampire” devices that continue to suck power even when the device is not in use.

The only intellectually defensible way to assess power usage is to add up all the power costs for an equivalent configuration of the prior model vs new model, e.g., with all the SSDs and drives and so on needed.

Of course, there is variation in setup. Presumably a few users can get by with only the internal SSD in the 2013 Mac Pro, and can use storage on a NAS and have their IT staff do backups. Or something like that. But most Mac Pro users will need Stuff attached.

In my 2010 Mac Pro, I have 2 internal hard drives, 2 PCIe SSDs, 3 SATA SSDs, and an eSATA card. These are all powered by the 2010 Mac Pro tower’s power supply. I use them all—heavily.

In the 2013 Mac Pro, all of my devices now have to be relocated into external enclosures. The power draw will rise for those devices (all those enclosures and fans and power bricks), canceling out some of the savings of the 2013 model. I expect lower total power draw (I hope).

I have a WattsUp power meter @AMAZON, so I can make some estimation of the differences, but my 2010 Mac Pro is also a 12 core with 80GB and so comparing that to my planned 6-core with 64GB itself isn’t entirely fair. Still, the idle power usage is of some interest, more so if the performance is similar.

OWC Thunderblade Thunderbolt 3 SSD

Blazing fast, up to 16TB.


√ No more slow and noisy hard drives! | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__