diglloyd Mac Performance Guide
Speed To Create, Capacity To Dream
USB-C Dock for MacBook

4 USB3 ports, 1 USB-C port, SD card reader, gigabit ethernet, audio ports, HDMK 4K port!

Lifespan of Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS)

Get APC UPS at B&H Photo.

A bad smell developed in the garage, where I keep a couple of servers running on uninterruptible power supplies (UPS). Two batteries, each weighing about 75 pounds, are daisy-chained for extra “juice” off an APC SmartUPS 1000XL. I do so because I’ve had power failures up to 24 hours.

Both of the add-on batteries had leaking battery acid, or rather, signs of it having leaked such as white powder and blackened wood under the units and what looked like fluid on the plastic casing. I disconnected them and set them aside for the next hazardous waste day.

The main unit with the “smarts” to which these batteries were daisy chained does not appear to be leaking, but its battery is now over 3 years old. The unit is running hot even at an ambient temperature of 40°F, and the charge lights show only about 80%, so it is done-for. These things should never get even warm under such conditions, so that battery is surely toast.

This is not the first stinky leaking battery problem with APC; I had this happen just as I was leaving for a trip last summer. That time, the battery had bulged so much that I had difficulty extracting it. I gave up and it went to hazardous waste disposal.

Maybe this is my fault: after all, lead acid batteries have a limited lifespan. But the fact that the APC unit cannot detect such potentially serious failure situations is disappointing and calls for taking care to assess the health of any UPS on a regular basis (3 months is probably about right).

I’m probably going to pick up a new APC Smart-UPS 1500VA with LCD and Audible Alarm Disabled, which has pure sine wave power when when running on battery power.

Tips:

  • Check your UPS battery every few months for signs of leakage: put an appointment in your calendar to check.
  • If the UPS is running hot, there is a very good chance the battery is bad. It could leak or rupture and cause damage. A fresh UPS does not run hot (once fully charged), since it is just bypassing current to devices.
  • Use a marker to write a date onto the battery itself, as shown.
Interior of APC SmartUPS 1000XL

Jon L writes:

I have used replacement batteries from this source of several years now. My backup demands are not as demanding as yours, but I have used several replacements from this firm that have served me well.

Below is the link to the APC RBC7 battery mentioned in Don H's reply to your post.

http://www.batteryspec.com/cgi-bin/cart.cgi?action=link&product=182

The listing of replacements for all APC UPS Systems:

http://www.batteryspec.com/html/apc-ups-replacement-batteries.html

This company has been in business for > 30 years so they are not a flash in the pan. Substantially less expensive than APC replacements as well. I’m sure you know more about the technology behind these batteries than I do.

You might take a look. No relationship with the firm: just a satisfied customer.

MPG: I’ve been leery of 3rd party batteries, but the prices above are far lower. But this site has way more brains to their approach: a listing showing UPS models and their batteries. It is WAY better than the APC site. Also, it's about 30 miles from me. I’m going to see if I can just drive down their and get things swapped out.

One thing APC *does* include is free return postage for disposing of the old one. I know little about the issue; I’m just a customer who doesn’t want an exploding or leaking battery. And since 3 (actually 4) APC batteries have leaked or bulged in the past year, I’m open to credible alternatives at a lower price.

Don H writes:

In the 1990s I worked for a growing company and had to spec out a UPS large enough to support five servers for a six-hour outage. At the time APC had the best modular system, so we bought that and it performed well. This was back when Cisco’s product line only had three basic models of routers while Apple had a sprawling product matrix with far too much overlap among machines. (We called that phenomenon ‘Spindlerization’, due to Mike Spindler’s penchant for trying to match the PC world model-for-model.)

Over the years I have bought and used APC UPSs for personal use, but noticed that they too expanded their product line to the point that one can no longer navigate it. (Meanwhile, Apple famously managed to rein in their own product line.) One consequence of this lack of cohesion is that many UPSs became orphaned because the batteries were no longer available, or became so expensive that it was not economically feasible to buy a replacement battery for almost the cost of an entirely new unit. And this is what irritates me about a lot of companies: the changes made to the parts are all just different enough to thwart cross-product or backward compatibility, yet the changes are not significant enough to provide any functional benefit.

Sony did this with their consumer electronics power supplies (it seemed like every new product changed the charging connector and power brick.) Wristwatches (remember those?) have a battery variety that fills fat books. Samsung’s entire business is a pathological example of change for the sake of change. (I have no idea how their service department handles it all, partly because I will never buy a Samsung product.)

I have discarded otherwise functional APC UPSs because it was too frustrating to chase down replacement batteries. The last time I looked, their web site was a mess*. Because of these practices I have written them off - APC is dead to me. Other UPS companies have similar, but not quite as acute disorganization, but I haven’t had the bad experience (yet?) with other brands that I have with APC.

Well, crap. I just looked at Tripp Lite’s product line. That’s 279 different models, each with one insignificant feature different from a dozen others.

I guess it’s better to have an embarrassment of riches rather than nothing at all, but I am personally getting really tired of hacking my way through other companies’ wasteful lack of focus or product cohesion. Your post on APC just happened to trigger this particular rant.

* Ok, I just looked again and the first thing I see at APC is an ad saying “Want to turn APC products into Recurring revenue?". I know the intention is to sell ‘managed services’ but my immediate interpretation is that they have figured out a way to milk their own customers with post-sales water torture costs.

But I stand by my complaint about their ridiculous product line. I would be willing to bet that they now have three or four hundred UPS models just in their Back-UPS and Smart-UPS categories, and that’s not getting into their enterprise ’solutions'.

MPG: indeed, it is a very confusing product line with hundreds of options.

I spent 20 minutes trying to find the right internal replacement battery for the SmartUPS 1000XL (it is not listed in specifications or data sheet!). I am pretty sure that the right replacement for the APC SmartUPS 1000XL is the APC Replacement Battery Cartridge #7, RBC7. I did find the external add-on battery supplement page.

APC sucks in a lot of ways: the web site can be extremely slow, it is very hard to find the right battery (and no distinction between internal and external). Tech support inquiries require serial numbers—well it’s not see easy to get a serial number when a 50 or 75 lb device is in a tight space that does not make it visible. I might look at TRIPP LITE and see how that goes because evey time I have to deal with battery issues it chews up hours.

Performance Package for Mac Pro or iMac 5K
For iMac 5K or For 2013 Mac Pro
Recommended by diglloyd as ideal for photographers and videographers

Bill Atkinson’s “Photo Card” for iPhone/iPad: Tangible Internet-Age Postcards

Bill Atkinson is Mr. Hypercard, of Apple fame. He is a color expert and brilliant photographer. Today I had the pleasure of his company on several topics, including his latest creation.

Bill showed me his latest creation, the iPhone/iPad app “Photo Card”, available on the Apple Store. Other platforms are coming, e.g., Android, and I am trying to persuade him to do a web interface for computer users like me.

It started simply enough—Bill showed me one of his postcards—printed and sent through the mail. The card is very durable and aside from holding it to see sheen to reveal the printed-on postal service processing stuff (or a UV light), it looks like it was just custom made and was never posted.

It’s the kind of thing you could not do half as well at home: I was astounded at the quality of the laminated card with excellent color. They’re way more good enough to frame—and no backing/support is needed in a frame so you can see front and back of the card.

How it works

First, you need to create an account and buy credits.

You choose your own image, your own stamp, and you can even add a QR reader for a voice recording. Very slick, very well thought out. For example, just entering the zip code alone looks up the city and state, saving time on addressing.

A preview after editing is shown below. The fish picture (mine) will be the front of the postcard. The stamp is a real postage stamp made with my own image, the bike is a graphic just for fun, the smaller fish picture is yet another picture of mine, and the yellow/blue thing will contain a QR code with a recorded voice message up to a minute long.

Two things from my POV: (1) the images have to be on the phone to be used by the app, which for me means copying and syncing to the phone first—a hassle. This is of course NOT an issue for shots made with the iPhone and already on the phone. (2) I would like to make cards on my Mac in an app or web browser because it is far more efficient for me to work on a computer, where all my photos and contacts are stored.

Bill Atkinson’s iPhone app 'Photo Card', preview of final card

Below, a not yet finished card.

Bill Atkinson’s iPhone app 'Photo Card', editing view

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

FOR SALE: Lloyd’s Apple Laptops, NEC Display

Cleaning house—recently bought a new 15" MacBook Pro.

Contact Lloyd

  • Mid 2012 MacBook Pro 13" 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7, 16GB / 480GB OWC Mercury Extreme Pro SSD / Intel HD Graphics 4000 512MB with charger $825. OWC sells a similar model used for $1200. Speedy little laptop fast enough to run all my web sites (it was a spare).
  • NEC EA244UHD 4K display $650 (sells new for $1049). See my review.
    A very nice 4K display (see my review), but I’m just not using it any more because of iMac 5K. Never saw many hours of operation, so backlight should have long life. Would make a terrific primary display for space constrained environments and/or an excellent 2nd display.
  • Late 2013 MacBook Pro Retina 15" 2.6 Ghz, 16GB / 512GB / NVidia GeForce GT 750M 2GB (top of the line except 512GB SSD) with charger in Apple box $1200 / BO. Original owner, was covered by AppleCare — no issues. Has a minor dent and scratches on case, keys worn.
    This was my workhorse laptop for the past 3 years and it just keeps going strong. Local buyers welcome to inspect firsthand. Still a strong performer even beating the 2016 model on some Photoshop tests. SOLD
  • 2011 MacBook Pro 13" 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5, 4GB / 200GB enterprise-grade SSD with charger $350. SOLD
    No speed demon, but a solid computer for the kids.
B&H Deal ZoneDeals by Brand/Category/Savings
Deals expire in 16 hours unless noted. Certain deals may last longer.
$597 SAVE $100 = 14.0% Ricoh GR II in Cameras: Point and Shoot

Adobe Memory Usage, with no apps in use

See my Mac wish list.

Earlier today I wrote about macOS BloatWare.

Adobe Memory usage with no Adobe apps running

Now it’s Adobe’s turn to be spanked: I take a dim view of products using substantial memory when absolutely nothing is running.

These Adobe processes are just there running all the time even when no apps are in use, and they take up 132MB of real memory. On 4GB or 8GB machines, this is not a trivial consideration and if every vendor did this, pretty soon a GB or two of memory would be scarfed up to no useful purpose.

Adobe ought to have one bootstrap daemon using at most 10MB, one that can fork off all this overhead cruft when an app is actually in use. As shown, memory usage rises to justa bout doubles for these overhead processes when an Photoshop is in use—a huge amount for what is likely a very basic task.

macOS BloatWare (and what feels like SpyWare)

See my Mac wish list.

Recently I’ve found that Photoshop CC 2017 on macOS 10.12.2 will no longer complete the diglloydMedium benchmark in 16GB of memory without a slowdown—compare 2013 results to 2015 results to 2016 results—the trend is substantially slower at present. What I observe here in 2016/2017 is a lot more memory swapping, which necessarily slows down the test.

So something has bloated in the system to push it beyond the point at which 16GB is adequate, causing that memory swapping: (a) the benchmark runs as fast in 2016/2017 as it did in 2013 when enough memory is availble and (b) Activity Monitor shows lots of swapping going on. See 2013 Mac Pro results, which show that time to execute in 2013 is within 1.1% of the 2016 figure. Ditto for the iMac 5K — but both have 64GB.

I think it likely that the slowdown is mainly due to a bloated macOS memory footprint, though I cannot rule out Adobe getting sloppy witih a lot of memory usage overhead.

Why does all this stuff run that I do not want, some of which I have even turned off?

All of these processes consume memory and at some point, consume CPU time.

I was looking through running processes and wondering how much crapware and bloatware I might find. But off isn’t actually off in some cases, like Siri.

Qué Siri, Sera isn’t an acceptable answer. All of these were running on my 2013 Mac Pro, all take memory and none of these processes offer functionality I want active. Some like “CallHistoryPluginHelper” raise privacy concerns, and that’s not idle speculation.

Use "sudo launchctl list" to list active background processes. Alternatively, one can select all in Activity Monitor and copy/paste as plain text, but the two lists use different names for some processes.

The list below reflects turning off everything that I don’t want that macOS allows to be turned off, so the actual list for most users may be significantly larger/longer. As well, there are more daemon processes running than just these.


AirPlayUIAgent — I never use AirPlay
AirPlayXPCHelper — I never use AirPlay
airportd — I never use wireless on my Mac Pro
CallHistoryPluginHelper — raises privacy concerns: what call history? From my phone?
CallHistorySyncHelper — raises privacy concerns: what call history? From my phone?
callservicesd — for what exactly? Phone call lists again?
com.apple.photoanalysisd.plist — privacy concern to be analyzing photos without consent
findmydeviced Find My Mac is turned OFF
mediaremoteagent — I doubt this does anything I want.
mediaremoted — I doubt this does anything I want.
mobileassetd — I doubt this does anything I want.
parentalcontrolsd — with a single user and no parental controls set?
photolibraryd — I don't want Photos library
Photos Agent — I don't want Photos running
Sirioffensive - I have Siri turned OFF
Wi-Fi — I never use WiFi on my Mac Pro
wirelessproxd — I don't use or want wireless
WirelessRadioManagerd — I don't use or want wireless

If Console.app is opened, it’s a mess: a steady stream of sputum is ejected constantly. You’ll see this on every Mac, it’s voluminous, and a fresh system install brings the same mess. A very small sample below. A lot of this is normal, but a lot of it repeats constantly, and it’s all from Apple stuff—and what is “CSSM Exception” from Spotlight (mdworker) and why does it spew constantly? It makes looking for real issues far more difficult.

default	13:15:43.802085 -0800	gamed	GKClientProxy: clientForBundleID:
default	13:15:43.802128 -0800	gamed	GKClientProxy: updateIfRecentlyInstalled
default	13:15:43.850130 -0800	Core Sync	TCP Conn 0x60000018aeb0 event 1. err: 0
default	13:15:43.850159 -0800	Core Sync	TCP Conn 0x60000018aeb0 complete. fd: 31, err: 0
default	13:15:43.850295 -0800	Core Sync	TCP Conn 0x60000018aeb0 starting SSL negotiation
default	13:15:43.930815 -0800	Core Sync	TCP Conn 0x60000018aeb0 SSL Handshake DONE
default	13:15:46.033359 -0800	gamed	GKClientProxy: clientForBundleID:
default	13:15:46.033419 -0800	gamed	GKClientProxy: updateIfRecentlyInstalled
default	13:15:46.033859 -0800	gamed	GKClientProxy: clientForBundleID:
default	13:15:46.033882 -0800	gamed	GKClientProxy: updateIfRecentlyInstalled
default	13:15:46.100246 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 0, EGID: 0
default	13:15:46.931828 -0800	symptomsd	NDFSM: auto bug capture is administratively OFF, ignoring symptom with key: 421890
default	13:15:47.537797 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 0, EGID: 0
default	13:15:47.538055 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:47.538475 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 501, EUID: 501, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:47.546837 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 501, EUID: 501, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:51.187559 -0800	CommCenter	#watchdog #I Callback Watchdog: checkin 328
default	13:15:51.187636 -0800	CommCenter	#watchdog #I Server Watchdog: checkin 328
default	13:15:56.345479 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 0, EGID: 0
default	13:15:56.345596 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 0, EGID: 0
default	13:15:56.345729 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:56.345783 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 0, EUID: 0, GID: 89, EGID: 89
default	13:15:56.346063 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 501, EUID: 501, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:56.346153 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 89, EUID: 89, GID: 89, EGID: 89
default	13:15:56.355784 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 89, EUID: 89, GID: 89, EGID: 89
default	13:15:56.355894 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 501, EUID: 501, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:56.359875 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 89, EUID: 89, GID: 89, EGID: 89
default	13:15:56.359905 -0800	opendirectoryd	Client: , UID: 501, EUID: 501, GID: 20, EGID: 20
default	13:15:56.379043 -0800	mdworker	subsystem: com.apple.securityd, category: csresource, enable_level: 0, persist_level: 0,
default_ttl: 0, info_ttl: 0, debug_ttl: 0, generate_symptoms: 0, enable_oversize: 0, privacy_setting: 2, enable_private_data: 0
default	13:15:56.379083 -0800	mdworker	subsystem: com.apple.securityd, category: csresource, enable_level: 0, persist_level: 0,
default_ttl: 0, info_ttl: 0, debug_ttl: 0, generate_symptoms: 0, enable_oversize: 0, privacy_setting: 2, enable_private_data: 0
default	13:15:56.379258 -0800	mdworker	subsystem: com.apple.securityd, category: dirval, enable_level: 0, persist_level: 0,
default_ttl: 0, info_ttl: 0, debug_ttl: 0, generate_symptoms: 0, enable_oversize: 0, privacy_setting: 2, enable_private_data: 0
default	13:15:56.379300 -0800	mdworker	subsystem: com.apple.securityd, category: dirval, enable_level: 0, persist_level: 0,
default_ttl: 0, info_ttl: 0, debug_ttl: 0, generate_symptoms: 0, enable_oversize: 0, privacy_setting: 2, enable_private_data: 0
default	13:15:56.379560 -0800	mdworker	subsystem: com.apple.securityd, category: unixio, enable_level: 0, persist_level: 0,
default_ttl: 0, info_ttl: 0, debug_ttl: 0, generate_symptoms: 0, enable_oversize: 0, privacy_setting: 2, enable_private_data: 0
default	13:15:56.379644 -0800	mdworker	subsystem: com.apple.securityd, category: unixio, enable_level: 0, persist_level: 0,
default_ttl: 0, info_ttl: 0, debug_ttl: 0, generate_symptoms: 0, enable_oversize: 0, privacy_setting: 2, enable_private_data: 0
default	13:15:56.612652 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612654 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612700 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612699 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612758 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612758 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612797 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.612797 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.616884 -0800	trustd	cert[2]: AnchorTrusted =(leaf)[force]> 0
default	13:15:56.616921 -0800	trustd	cert[2]: AnchorTrusted =(leaf)[force]> 0
default	13:15:56.618896 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.618909 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.618945 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.618968 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.619007 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.619010 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.619046 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.619046 -0800	mdworker	CSSM Exception: -2147411889 CSSMERR_CL_UNKNOWN_TAG
default	13:15:56.625643 -0800	trustd	cert[2]: AnchorTrusted =(leaf)[force]> 0
default	13:15:56.625651 -0800	trustd	cert[2]: AnchorTrusted =(leaf)[force]> 0

Mike writes:

MacOS X, I will remain on Yosemite, has always been full of bloat and it is deteriorating fast and steadily.

SIP making it even harder to find the necessary ticks and switches to be halfway back in control of your own machine.

With 16 GB RAM in my MacBook Pro the system eats 25-30% of RAM after a cold boot just idling in Finder.

Deleting or unloading all those services is in my eyes a must. There are daemons active that are meant for features that aren't even supported on my hardware. Airdrop, anything iphoney, like handoff, cloud-nonsense: the lists just keeps growing.

After going through all these launchctl agents and and demons (sic!) – that are sorely lacking in documentation; just to add insult to injury – I am now happy about a system that 'just' eats away 10-15% RAM at idle. That is about half of both RAM-sticks the machine came with.

Of course you have to avoid Mail.app and Safari, Contacts and just about anything that Apple chose to bundle. They are mostly useless or downright dangerous for my data.

Then try to look at what cfprefsd does, writing plist files into your user preferences directory every minute for things like Dock and Finder that only are in use. Not changing anything in there respective preferences. coresymbolicationd's data directory, coreduetd's /var folder (Even when it was never used, never was supported on my machine, it managed to accumulate 5 GB of worthless data when I found out about it.) The always growing out of hand and often self.corrupting cache-files, etc. The only example I know of that actually got better from 10.9 to 10.10 was /private/var/log/asl keeping itself in manageable and sensible proportions in Yosemite. Keeping in mind that there are now even more examples of these crazy writes to disk one keeps wondering if this is equally detrimental for ssd's as the recent Firefox-session-store 'scandal'? Once set up I rarely change prefs in my apps. And yet. Cfprefsd writes 10 GB a day 'for me' and this is untenable _and_ untameable.

So I keep asking myself and now I am asking you: For how long will you remain in this sinking boat and swallow all those salty drinks Apple keeps serving us?

Come WWDC security updates for Yosemite will stop. If they announce a single new feature instead of a very, very large list of grievances fixed along with an apology for all those crazy stupid design decisions of the past years (starting with .DS_Store), then I will jump ship.

MPG: the natives are getting restless.

Constant writes to disk are a source of wear and tear on SSDs; the flash cells on SSDs can be written so many times. Writing 1 byte or ten is the same as writing an entire 512K block (of flash memory). It is perhaps an argument for never booting off an expensive SSD, just to avoid the constant write-harrassment of the SSD by the OS.

Safari Seems Less Stable in macOS 10.12.2

See my Mac wish list.

Safari has been crashing more lately, and I suspect macOS 10.12.2 is involved, though it might just be that macOS Sierra is the turd it has felt like from the start.

Today, I just wanted to print one page from a web site—it’s not asking a whole lot.

Process:               Safari [30427]
Path:                  /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari
Identifier:            com.apple.Safari
Version:               10.0.2 (12602.3.12.0.1)
Build Info:            WebBrowser-7602003012000001~2
Code Type:             X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process:        ??? [1]
Responsible:           Safari [30427]
User ID:               501
Date/Time:             2017-01-10 08:43:53.862 -0800
OS Version:            Mac OS X 10.12.2 (16C68)
Report Version:        12
Anonymous UUID:        3A1B3248-8914-452A-A38E-AF944F6FE8CA
Sleep/Wake UUID:       652ED10F-8234-48DA-A5DA-00E009C4C044
Time Awake Since Boot: 26000 seconds
Time Since Wake:       3300 seconds
System Integrity Protection: enabled
Crashed Thread:        33
Exception Type:        EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes:       KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000018
Exception Note:        EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY
Termination Signal:    Segmentation fault: 11
Termination Reason: Namespace SIGNAL, Code 0xb
Terminating Process: exc handler [0] Thread 33 Crashed: 0 libobjc.A.dylib 0x00007fffbcc32b5d objc_msgSend + 29 1 com.apple.AppKit 0x00007fffa5bb3aed -[NSView(NSLayerKitGlue) _drawViewBackingLayer:inContext:drawingHandler:] + 1717 2 com.apple.AppKit 0x00007fffa5bb3432 -[NSView(NSLayerKitGlue) drawLayer:inContext:] + 80 3 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadc76314 CABackingStoreUpdate_ + 3740 4 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadd93464 ___ZN2CA5Layer8display_Ev_block_invoke + 75 5 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadd930c5 CA::Layer::display_() + 1803 6 com.apple.AppKit 0x00007fffa5bb22ca _NSBackingLayerDisplay + 577 7 com.apple.AppKit 0x00007fffa5ba5531 -[_NSViewBackingLayer display] + 885 8 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadd86f6e CA::Layer::display_if_needed(CA::Transaction*) + 572 9 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadd87099 CA::Layer::layout_and_display_if_needed(CA::Transaction*) + 35 10 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadd7c878 CA::Context::commit_transaction(CA::Transaction*) + 280 11 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadc73631 CA::Transaction::commit() + 475 12 com.apple.QuartzCore 0x00007fffadc73aab CA::Transaction::release_thread(void*) + 589 13 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fffbd73b50f _pthread_tsd_cleanup + 544 14 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fffbd73b249 _pthread_exit + 152 15 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fffbd73bda8 pthread_exit + 30 16 com.apple.Foundation 0x00007fffa99d2dd7 +[NSThread exit] + 11 17 com.apple.Foundation 0x00007fffa9967c81 __NSThread__start__ + 1263 18 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fffbd739aab _pthread_body + 180 19 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fffbd7399f7 _pthread_start + 286 20 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fffbd7391fd thread_start + 13
NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc!

The GPU remains a Science Fair Project

See my Mac wish list.

Update 10 Jan: Adobe contacted me (well, I sent a link to this post to Adobe!), and they are going to look into the crash I'm seeing. I have provided an actions file and script to drive it. Now if only they would also agree to do something to address the GPU scaling headache.

Three+ years ago, the 2013 Mac Pro was released by Apple with graphics drivers rife with bugs. It took 6 months to get the drivers to a usable state. Adobe actually added GPU support for sharpening, then had to take that support out. What I never understood is how Adobe could ship those code changes without proper testing, the proof of that being self evident in the undoing.

Graphics driver bugs caused by half-baked Apple code are one thing—and I do pin the lion’s share of the blame on Apple. [It is my understanding that AMD engineers actually developed the drivers for the Mac Pro, but it’s Apple’s responsibility to ensure quality control.]

GPU problems with Adobe Camera Raw in Photoshop CC 2017,
macOS 10.12.2

But graphics driver bugs aside, Adobe could at least address what it can, that is, Adobe fails to fix severe usability bugs that result from enabling the GPU—for over two years now. Adobe was/is well aware of this issue, because I communicated directly, the issue was acknowledged as “hard to fix”. But even though I suggested minimally invasive user interface changes that could at least sidestep the scaling problem, this was not done either. Well, what is the point of a GPU if it results in unreliable operation of any kind?

And now GPU bugs persist to this day and now have taken a turn for the worse.

With the release of macOS 10.12 Sierra and Adobe Photoshop CC 2017, Photoshop has become more unstable than it has been in years. My 2013 Mac Pro, 2013 and 2015 and 2016 MacBook Pro and iMac 5K all have shown this GPU problem, as shown. Not always, but at launch or other times, and often enough to be disturbing.

Just today, something hard-crashed my Mac Pro (hard power off required), an extremely infrequent event (months without such a crash)—I was using Photoshop/ACR. I suspect the crash was a GPU driver crash in kernel space.

I don’t know where the fault lies (Apple or Adobe), but it is pathetic that one of my test suites (Lens Filters) cannot be completed on any Macs reliably, and never can run successfully on 2 of the 5 Macs.

Chad M writes:

I just upgraded my 2013 Mac Pro to Sierra over the holidays while I had down time.

I’m using an AJA LHI through ThunderboltBox and Final Cut X 10.3.1. I am getting kernel panics now (must be around a dozen).

I’m suspecting a driver issue of some kind – and your GPU thoughts have me leaning to look more in that direction. Maybe the next OS update will help. I should never have updated. So frustrating!!

DIGLLOYD: frustrating indeed for professionals trying to get work done. A kernel panic is of the same bug level as my 'hard freeze' I reported: something nasty happening at a level that kills the operating system.

Martin writes:

I read all your articles, and especially the more nerdy stuff about apple. Normally most of the people writing about Apple have nearly no clue about this more nerdy in deep stuff.
but I have to say something about your GPU disillusionment.

I’m into this GPU stuff since the late 90 doing 3D visualization and animation with extremely special and expensive cards, GPU acceleration before it was on the mass market.

And people like me know all these weird problems you experience.

It may sound bold and offensive but the 2013 MacPro with AMD GPUs and Adobe is the worst possible scenario. AMD drivers are known from the beginning as not suitable for professional work, besides they always had this FireGL pro line.

When you’re lucky that the drivers are stable, you will somehow experience display or rendering (calculation errors), especially working with fine graining values or extremes.
This is the reason nearly every pro in the 3D business or doing extreme compositing / video stuff is equipped with NVidia cards. The bad thing, the quality of their drivers is declining. In most of the pro software products is CUDA better integrated, integrated at all, more stable and a lot faster.

AMD looks always sweet on the spec sheet but they never deliver these speeds or stability. And the last 20 years there was never a stable and bug-free OpenGL driver from ATI/AMD, they are known for bad OpenGL.

The bad stuff, a lot of Adobes GPU implementations are also founded on OpenGL, like Lightroom's develop module - ADOBE confirmed this official that LR uses OpenGL. So every Mac now with a DGPU has an AMD GPU. Adobes Mercury Engine also relies on a lot of NVIDIA stuff - Premiere renders x times faster on a GeForce — is there is now other problem - ADOBE’s GPU implementations are really bad - MEDIAENCODER loves to show it uses CUDA but renders on your slow CPU.

But there are other software companies who have working GPU code - like Phase One. Run Capture One Pro on an 5 year old Intel i5 PC with a cheap GTX 970 — this is so much faster than Lightroom on the most badass Mac or PC money can buy. But Phase One also suffers from bad AMD drivers on Mac Mac and PC—just take a look and their user forums, a lot of people mourn that the software is so slow on their newest hardware.

At the end it relies on the software and Apple is constantly kicking us pros into our balls with their decision not to use NVIDIA.

MPG: the survey at BareFeats.com shows that 80% want NVIDIA cards, not AMD.

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

2.5K or 4K or 5K Display for Image Editing and Viewing?

See my Mac wish list.

This essay at diglloyd.com goes into all the considerations in choosing a display: 2.5K or 4K or 5K Display for Image Editing and Viewing?. It applies equally to Windows users also.

See also Can a 2016 MacBook Pro support an 8K display?.

Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

Crapware in macOS

See my Mac wish list.

I just thought that screen shot below captures the hubris run amok at Apple: the disregard for users that manifests itself at every level of the software and hardware product stack.

Crapware that I cannot remove is a dissatisfier (applies to iOS also), whether it is Chess.app or Garbage Band (oops, did I mis-spell it?) or the other Apple apps I never use and never will use.

Chess.app is a required application in macOS Sierra

On a related note, I have turned Siri OFF. The arrogance of Apple running the Siri process anyway is part and parcel of the attitudinal problem.

macOS: Siri runs even when off

When Siri is off, it’s still running. Any attempt to disable it in the plist is rejected by special security privileges that cannot be bypassed.

macOS: Siri runs even when off and cannot be disabled, even in the plist

I thought that use launchctl might work, but it doesn’t work to unload it.

sudo launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchAgents/com.apple.Siri.plist
/System/Library/LaunchAgents/com.apple.Siri.plist: Could not find specified service

See also:

Greg M writes:

macOS: Siri runs even when off

I enjoy your comments about how bad the software Apple produces.

I opened up Contacts this morning and got this dialog box. All I did was open up Contacts, did no operations within.

MPG: sheer genius.

 

Mac Pro or iMac or MacBook Pro?
Storage, Backup, RAID?
Buy now or wait?

✓ diglloyd consulting starts you out on solid footing.

Can a 2016 MacBook Pro support an 8K display?

See my Mac wish list.

The Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K Display will hit the market in early spring, raising the question of whether any Macs can drive that glorious 33.2 megapixels.

The GPU power along with the bandwidth required to drive four 4K displays is just emerging, but the 2016 MacBook Pro looks like it might be capable enough.

Apple specifications for the 2016 MacBook Pro state:

Up to two displays with 5120-by-2880 resolution at 60Hz at over a billion colors
Up to four displays with 4096-by-2304 resolution at 60Hz at over a billion colors

A 4K display is 3840 X 2160; thus four displays at 4096 X 2304 offer 13.7% more bandwith than required to drive an 8K display. Of course, an 8K display would have to be the only display, unless a 2017 Mac Pro arrives that can drive six or eight 4K displays. But with a MacBook Pro, presumably the internal display remains usable, so a dual display system looks possible.

Using two Thunderbolt 3 cables, it should be possible to drive an 8K display on the 2016 MacBook Pro in 10 bit color*, at least in terms of the required bandwidth, using a trick similar to how a 5K display was possible in previous Macs: drive each half of the display with one of the Thunderbolt cables, that is, Multi Stream Transport. The same trick might work for 8K. Perhaps Apple or Dell will weigh in on this possibility soon.

* The Apple specifications indicate “billions” which means 10-bit color.

Potential for an iMac 8K

Since a 32-inch 8K panel now exists, and the 2016 MacBook Pro already has the bandwidth to drive an 8K display, an iMac 8K is technically possible with today’s technology.

An iMac 8K could use a custom graphics solution to push those 32 megapixels, just as the iMac 5K does. There is no need for wait for standards to evolve to support external 8K support; it can be done internally with a proprietary solution. The main issue is cooling, but Apple should be able to engineer an appropriate GPU cooling system. And since the 2016 MacBook Pro is an even greater cooling challenge, and it can drive four 4K displays, it hardly seems like an iMac 8K should have any barriers to supporting an 8K built-in display.

The Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K Display will apparently sell for $4999. Even assuming that Apple could use its considerable volume to get that price down to $2000 or so, it would make an iMac 8K with the necessary GPU power something hitting the $6K to $8K range in price. So even though it appears to be ideal for an 32" iMac 8K, cost is likely to push off such an iMac. Then again, Apple has surprised us in the past, and could do so again, particularly with its failure to innovate for several years now.

Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD 8K Display Suggests that an iMac 8K is Technically Feasible

See my Mac wish list.

See also Too-High Pixel Density on 5K and 8K Displays Impedes Image Assessment.

While I saw firsthand the LG 5K display for the 2016 MacBook Pro, unfortunately I did not chance upon the Dell 8K 32-inch display which was announced at CES.

7680 X 4320 pixels = 33.2 megapixes in 32" form factor, aspect ratio 1.77:1

A 4K display is like tiling together four HD displays and thus requires 4X the bandwidth of a conventional 1920 X 1080 display. An 8K display is like tiling together four 4K displays for a whopping 33.2 megapixels (7680 X 4320).

A a full resolution Nikon D810 image is 7360 X 4912, so its entire width fits with room to spare on an 8K display, although the aspect ratio is too tall to fit vertically. The pixel density of an 8K display has to be an awesome viewing experience, but high pixel density is problematic for assessing image sharpnesss.

The $4,999 UP3218K is slated to go on sale on March 23rd. It has a refresh rate of 60 Hz and will work with zero Macs and only a few select PCs with specialized video hardware, and even then GPU performance will need some time to catch up. The display supports 100 percent Adobe RGB, sRGB, and Rec709 color gamuts.

HDMI 2.1 (announced at CES) supports 8K, but Apple doesn’t even support HDMI 1.3 yet, so external 8K displays are likely to take a few years to become more than a special rarity.

However, at least in bandwith terms, 8K might already be possible; see: Can a 2016 MacBook Pro support an 8K display?

Potential for an iMac 8K

Since a 32-inch panel now exists, it seems ideal for an iMac 8K which could use a custom graphics solution to push those 32 megapixels—no need for wait for standards to evolve to support external 8K support; it can be done internally just as with the iMac 5K.

The Dell display will apparently sell for $4999. Even assuming that Apple could use its considerable volume to get that price down to $2000 or so, it would make an iMac 5K with the necessary GPU power something hitting the $6K to $8K range in price. So even though it appears to be ideal for an iMac design, pricing is an obstacle that could put off an iMac 8K for a year or more.

Upgrade Your Mac Memory
At much lower cost than Apple, with more options.
Lloyd recommends 64GB for iMac or Mac Pro for photography/videography.

LG 5K Display for 2016 MacBook Pro

See my Mac wish list.

See also Too-High Pixel Density on 5K and 8K Displays Impedes Image Assessment.

Yes, you want one. It looks fantastic in person, shot below from CES. But at present it works only on the 2016 MacBook Pro, via a Thunderbolt 3 cable, as shown below. OTOH, for about $1700 you can get a 5K display from Apple with a free computer.

I am NOT recommending it for work where evaluating image sharpness or very fine tweaks is needed—that’s why I still use the NEC PA302W for my image evaluation—the pixel density is way too high for that type of detail work. But like the iMac 5K viewing experience, the LG 5K is aweseome for viewing images, with its 14.7 megapixel display.

I did not chance upon the Dell 8K 32-inch display which was announced at CES, but a 32-inch panel now exists, it seems ideal for an iMac 8K which could use a custom graphics solution to push those 32 megapixels. An 8K display requires the bandwidth of four 4K displays and isn’t going to fly with any Mac (yet).

 
LG 5K display for 2016 MacBook Pro
__METADATA__
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

OWC Envoy Pro Thunderbolt 3 2TB SSD

I’m in SSD heaven!

I just saw a production version of the OWC Envoy Pro Thunderbolt 3 2TB SSD. About twice the size of the current OWC Envoy Pro EX (my go-to drive for travel backup and other on-the-go purposes), the new OWC Envoy Pro nonetheless fits in the palm of my hand. The larger size is all for the better, because it allows for very high capacity, cooling fins for sustained ultra high performance and a robust aluminum case.

  • 2TB capacity with a form factor that implies a 4TB version should emerge.
  • Thunderbolt 3.
  • Tested with DiskTester: this external SSD not only rocks on small transfers (about as fast as anything I’ve ever tested), it hits 1300 MiB/sec on writes and 2000 MiB/sec reads. Externally. That performance blows away the 1TB internal SSD in my 2013 Mac Pro, at twice the capacity. Practically speaking, more speed is of no practical concern for anything but the most specialized or obscure situation.
  • Pricing TBD.

I see this drive as a breakthrough device: 2TB (and maybe later, 4TB) capacity, desktop grade SSD performance, outstanding portability. I can’t think of anything ever before that combines all these attributes, with no downsides at all. Many people could carry all their Stuff on one of these drives and never look back. The possible catch: is it backward compatible with Thunderbolt 2 via the Apple Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter? It should be, but this is to be confirmed.

The OWC Envoy Pro Thunderbolt 3 2TB SSD should be available for purchase “before NAB” according to OWC (that means April or so).

2TB OWC Envoy Pro Thunderbolt 3 SSD attached to 2016 MacBook Pro
2TB OWC Envoy Pro Thunderbolt 3 SSD attached to 2016 MacBook Pro

A Powerful Argument for a Small Laptop

I grabbed dinner at the airport on the way to CES. I asked Andalé Taquería if El Presidente Burrito trumped El Supremo, but they feigned ignorance. Personally I think both are quite a mélange of ingredients.

Anyway, I’m sitting on a Virgin America 737 or whatever this narrow-bodied thing is, and I’m back in cattle class. There is barely (barely!) enough room to open my 15-inch MacBook Pro, with the likelihood of it being damaged if the passenger ahead of me reclines his seat—so I politely asked for a warning if he were to be so inclined (double entendre intended).

If I flew regularly, I’d buy a MacBook just for airline travel. In the “old days” a 15-inch laptop was not a problem. On Virgin America, it’s a bad choice size in this godawful sardine can. But there were few options left when I bought my ticket.

Update: the return flight on Jet Blue was vastly better for leg space. And for $25 I sat in seat 4D where I could actually stretch my legs out, and my pack would fit under the seat ahead of my. Night and day better vs Virgin America.

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

OWC “DEC” for 2016 MacBook Pro

Update 4 Jan: I’ve seen the prototype of the OWC DEC first hand. The DEC bolts onto the bottom of the MacBook Pro after removing the bottom shell of the case. The result is a seamless integration with all the key ports I need (gigabit ethernet, USB-A 3.1, SD card slot), delivering what feels in the hand very much like the 13" 2012 MacBook Pro in thickness (but in 15" size).

The convenience of this form factor should not be underestimated by any power user: no dongles, the classic ports right built-in, and from what I understand—potentially configurable for all sorts of things like extra battery power, gobs of SSD storage, possibly even hard drives. In short, a really powerful platform could make a MacBook Pro into a portable desktop grade machine, particularly if/when Apple introduces the Kaby Lake chipset to the MacBook Pro line.

Another factor is data safety: by having a 2nd (or 3rd drive) in the DEC, pros that cannot lose data can backup the internal drive conveniently (think video footage that cannot be re-shot and whose loss could break a reputation after ruining that wedding or whatever)—remember the soldered-on SSD is a lot of downtime if the MBP goes down. Of course, an external backup should also be used, and there the OWC Envoy Pro is ideal.

The conceptual design is just about limitless, affording possibilities for huge SSD storage (my guess is that up to 8TB will be possible before long, OWC says up to 4TB initially), extra battery power should be configurable too—how about 20 or 30 hours of battery life? That too is my guess but the volume of the DEC should be able support something like that and/or a mix of SSD and battery boost. Other potentialities are there too. I don’t see anything that precludes all sorts of terrific expansion capabilities, all by extending the thicknesss of the MacBook Pro to a total height little different from what used to be the standard thickness.

The OWC DEC will be available for purchase in Spring 2017, according to OWC.

Form factor of the OWC DEC is little different from what used to be the standard MacBook Pro thickness. Connector at right (prototype, final will be more elegant) couples the Thunderbolt 3 port of the MacBook Pro to the DEC.

Later units (not prototypes) will have an SD card slot and USB port on the right side, and other ports (gigabit ethernet, more USB ports) on left side. OWC hints at other potential ports as well.

Prototype of OWC DEC attached to 15" 2016 MacBook Pro
Production version to polish fit and finish, plus space gray or silver options

Sleek enough to travel with because the form factor is little different from what used to be the standard MacBook Pro thickness.

OWC Makes MacBooks ‘Pro’ Again With Game-Changing OWC DEC

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2017

OWC today announced the OWC DEC, the first-ever expansion solution designed specifically for the 2016 Apple MacBook Pro. The OWC DEC is the finishing touch to a MacBook Pro, allowing users to take their laptops to the next level, extending the life and the functionality of the already-exceptional 2016 MacBook Pro. The DEC is the latest in OWC’s long line of upgrades for nearly every Mac made and continues the company’s legacy of providing the best solutions for Mac owners.

The OWC DEC attaches completely flush to the bottom of the 2016 MacBook Pro, providing additional flash storage and connectivity, ultimately increasing the performance of MacBook Pros. With the OWC DEC, users will get an enhancement path for their 2016 MacBook Pro and MacBook Pro with Touch Bar to keep their system upgradeable for the long term in a clean and integrated fashion. On top of the core functional benefits, the OWC DEC also touts a sleek design. When installed, the OWC DEC and MacBook Pro will be as thin as a 2012 MacBook Pro, allowing this advanced solution to retain the attractive light weight design that users favor.

This patented solution has a range of features, which include:

  • Up to 4TB of additional Flash/SSD storage (for a maximum of 6 TB, including factory capacity)
  • SD Card Slot/Multi-Media card slot
  • USB 3 Type A Ports for standard USB cabled devices
  • Gigabit Ethernet
  • And other features to be announced at a later date

Larry O’Connor, OWC Founder and CEO, will personally showcase the OWC DEC prototype in Las Vegas this week. The OWC DEC enables the new MacBook Pro to be updated and expanded in order to operate at peak performance and ultimately be relevant for years longer than may otherwise be expected.

“We’ve been developing this concept for over three years and feel now is the perfect time for this ground-breaking product,” said O’Connor. “Storage space is always at a premium on a laptop and without the potential to upgrade the factory drive, the OWC DEC brings that option back in addition to cleanly supporting the gear we all rely on.”

The release of the OWC DEC comes on the heels of a significant year of new product announcements from OWC, including the OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock, OWC USB-C Dock, Aura SSD and the newly released Mercury Elite Pro Dual mini and Mercury Elite Pro Dual.

OWC will ship the highly-anticipated OWC DEC in Spring 2017. OWC Upgrades are available from MacSales.com and other fine retailer and e-tailers in the U.S. and around the world. For more information, please visit www.owcdigital.com/DEC.

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

Desktop CPU Performance at a Standstill?

As I wrote in Computers Are not Getting Faster in a Meaningful Way, GPU is Half-Baked Tech, Too Many Software Developers Suck, computer performance has hardly changed in 3+ years. All while most software continues to make poor use of CPU cores, so a double whammy from two different directions.

ArsTechnica comments on the CPU situation in Intel Core i7-7700K Kaby Lake review: Is the desktop CPU dead?:

With identical performance to Skylake, Intel brings desktop performance to a standstill.

The Intel Core i7-7700K is what happens when a chip company stops trying. The i7-7700K is the first desktop Intel chip in brave new post-"tick-tock" world—which means that instead of major improvements to architecture, process, and instructions per clock (IPC), we get slightly higher clock speeds and a way to decode DRM-laden 4K streaming video. Huzzah.

Update 04 Jan: are at least a few reasons why the Intel 'Kaby Lake' release is significant:

  • Improved graphics performance.
  • My understanding is that the Kaby Lake 'H' series supports 32GB memory, thus making a MacBook Pro with 32GB of DR 23000 DRAM possible. But whether the power draw is viable on a laptop is unclear (meaning what we could expect from Apple, given the rationalizations seen with the Nov 2016 MacBook Pro).
  • The i7-7920HQ 3.1 GHz (turbo boost to 4.1 GHz, 4 real CPU cores) might be suitable for a MacBook Pro.
  • The i7-7700K 4.2 GHz (turbo boost 4.5 GHz) shoudl be suitable for an iMac. This perhaps is the “standstill” point—that’s only 5% faster than the 4.0 GHz iMac 5K that sits on my desk today—at the cost of a 95 watt TPD.

Even if CPU performance is stuck in 3rd gear for now, all is not lost. In particular, Apple could go back to a real “pro” desktop by making it a big box again, with features like this. I bet that it would be a best-seller Mac Pro:

  • A choice of 4 to 18 CPU cores, or whatever the limit is currently. Even better: dual CPUs again.
  • 8 memory slots accepting up to 256GB. Stretch goal: 12 or 16 memory slots for up to 384GB.
  • 12 Thunderbolt 3 ports, split across 3 busses.
  • Support for three external 5K displays.
  • Single outrageously fast GPU.
  • Two 16x PCIe slots for optional 2nd or 3rd GPU and/or extra PCIe SSD, etc.
  • Internal SSD options of 1TB or 2TB or 4TB, option for 2nd SSD with same capacity options, running at 3 GB/sec.
  • Space for two internal hard drives, thus allowing 20TB internally in addition to the SSDs.
  • Nice to have: 4 USB3 ports to keep connectivity hassles down with useful legacy devices (mouse, keyboard, camera card readers, USB3 drives, etc).

Why not? Apple could re-establish itself as a serious player for high-end performance. Make it a box, but very quiet box, a big cylinder if some nitwit demands that as the tradeoff, but make it robust.

BareFeats.com has a a very interesting survey highly relevant to the above points: 63% prefer a tower form factor, 62% prefer six or more CPU cores, 34% prefer 128GB or more memory, few users want AMD GPUs (NVIDIA strongly preferred), 73% want support for at least two displays, 39% want 5K support, 43% want at least 4TB of internal storage. And so on. Clearly there is a desire for a high end machine.

Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

Apple Core Rot: PDF Support

Is this incompetence, disdain, or all-out contempt for developers and users? MPG tends to favor the “incompetence and mismanagement” theory, but those generally require some degree of the other two, that is, to allow it to be approved and ship to customers.

Apple Insider: Apple's changes to macOS PDF handling stymie third-party developers, cause data loss

Apple's changes to how it handles PDFs in macOS Sierra are causing problems with third-party utilities, with the most profound issue potentially causing the removal of an optical character recognition layer from user's files.

Adam Engst from long-time Mac journal TidBITS noted that while problems were widely publicized at Sierra's launch with ScanSnap scanner software, other issues have persisted after two updates, and in some cases gotten worse.
...

According to reports collated by Engst, and confirmed by AppleInsider, Apple has re-written the PDFKit framework in macOS 10.12 Sierra, and implemented a common core with iOS and macOS. However, this has caused some serious issues with software that relies on Apple's PDFKit.
...

MPG: data loss supports the “disdain and contempt” theory, but does not rule out sheer incompetence.

Note the “common core” thing—a very dangerous trend for future APIs in terms of reliability, compatibility and data integrity particularly since Apple seems to have no idea what unit testing is.

Whose data of any kind is safe when Apple has no qualms about rewriting APIs that damage user files? Such actions show a profound disrespect for users, although leaving RAID users hung out to dry is arguably far worse.

On the Apple Core Rot topic, see one more view in Apple’s 2016 in review.

Monitoring Most Everything: iStat Menus

 
iStatMenus: CPU and Network Status

Last week I reported on cleaning out dust to forestall component failure.

A program like iStatMenus can help figure out if a Mac is overheating; take a baseline when new or after cleaning and periodically check those temperatures against temperatures some months later (assuming the same room temperature). Or, if the Mac’s fans are running too loudly or too frequently under no apparent load situation, check out the temperature of the components.

BJango Software also offers iStat for Mac. Maybe it can run locally only, but it seems to be designed for remote monitoring via iStat Server.

While iStatMenus has a wealth of information, and has a smooth and polished interface—it’s a terrific tool—there are two things that bother me which are peculiar to my own setup.

  • I would prefer to have all this information in one window for two reasons: (1) see everything at once, and (2) locate the window on whichever display I want to, (3) unclutter y menu bar. Well, it’s iStatMenus for a reason so that is by design. Still I would like this info in a window which would reside on my 4K display for the same reason all my palettes in Photoshop are off my main screen.
  • With my dual display setup, the main screen is standard (non Retina) resolution. The very small type is not os easy to read on standard-res displays. The menu bar must be on that display (it is not a viable option to put a menu bar on the other display and/or to make the 4K 2nd display be the primary, for my own reasons). So I am stuck with small type that is unfriendly to my eyes and cannot be captured with retina quality in a screen shot either. The foregoing is inapplicable to my iMac 5K or to my MacBook Pro.

Below, all the sensor measurements on my 2013 Mac Pro.

iStatMenus: Sensor measurements on 8-core 3.3 GHz 2013 Mac Pro

Configuring the “Combined” menu

I like the combined menu because I can mouse over each area as submenus. If configured to use separate menus in the menu bar (each area of reporting having its own separate menu), then each menu has to be clicked on separately.

See my previous comments: a modal information display is not nearly to my linking as being able to see all this stuff in one larger status display.

iStatMenus: “Combined” menu with Memory submenu

2016 MacBook Pro: Test Results vs 2015 MacBook Pro and 13" 2016 MacBook Pro + a Big Surprise

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Deal on top-spec 2015 MacBook Pro at OWC.

I encountered a stunning surprise when testing: the 13" 2016 MacBook Pro dual-core 2.4 GHz beat out all but one of the other Macs on my #1 most important Photoshop task. And I had to give the other Macs several tries to get better times; the times usually were slower.

That’s insane! But I ran and re-ran the test—same deal. So to paraphrase Mark Twain, there are lies, damn lies, and benchmarks. All that matters is how well a computer works for one’s own particular workflow.

This amazing performance is from the 13" 2.4 GHz / 16GB / 512GB non-touchbar model, whose Turbo Boost mode hits 3.4 GHz, which is only 0.1 GHz slower than the fastest processor Apple offers in the 13" model. But those faster base-clock-speed models require the touchbar, and the touchbar is a non-starter for me and others. Plus, the touchbar model has a significantly smaller battery and slotted (not soldered-on) SSD. I also found that the 13" model has the least trouble cooling itself, as judged by fan noise (not much even under load). Plus the 13" model does not slow down under some loads like the 15" model does.

While all of the machines showed some variability in test results (laptops in particular), multiple runs confirm the dominance of the 13" 2016 MacBook Pro in this real-world workflow challenge. The graph below takes the fastest time from each machine. Other tests show the 13" model to be be slower, but quite a feisty ankle biter on many tests. If anything, it shows that software plays a huge role in using or not using CPU cores efficiently.

2016 MacBook Pro vs other Macs: Photoshop filters
Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

2016 MacBook Pro: Test Results Updated to include 2015 MacBook Pro and 13-inch 2016 MacBook Pro

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Deal on top-spec 2015 MacBook Pro at OWC.

zzzzzzzz

2016 MacBook Pro: Photoshop Filters

2016 MacBook Pro vs other Macs: Photoshop filters
Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

Bought the 2015 MacBook Pro: Best Model for My Usage at a Big Savings

2015 Apple MacBook Pro Retina

See all my previous discussion on the 2016 MacBook Pro, which I returned.

My main issue with my rock-solid 2013 MacBook Pro has been simple: its 512GB SSD has been an increasing headache (only 180GB free space given other necessary stuff, a problem on my photography trips). So I’ve been wanting a MacBook Pro with a 1TB SSD for a while, but I didn’t want to pay full fare.

As well, ergonomics and performance and compatibility all matter to me—all a 'fail' with the 2016 MacBook Pro. The 2015 MacBook pro is the best one Apple ever made (for my needs) when those things are all taken into consideration—not the 2016 MacBook Pro.

Bonus wins:

And while the 2016 model has Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C, that brings adapter hassles and I really don’t need TB3 anyway, since I expect an iMac or Mac Pro to bring TB3 sometime soon in 2017—and when I am working at home I don’t use the laptop anyway. So TB3 doesn’t do anything for me on a laptop.

For a lot less money, I bit the bullet and ordered a 2015 MacBook Pro 2.8 GHz / 16GB / 1TB 2015 from OWC. Which is faster on what I do anyway! It is factory sealed Apple refurbished with a one year warrant and eligible for AppleCare, so just like a new one.

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

Another “Going Back” Review of the 2016 MacBook Pro

While I did purchase the 2016 MacBook Pro 13" model for my college-bound daughter, it was the non-touchbar model, that is the non-annoying model. The 2016 MacBook Pro is a 'fail', its plusses notwithstanding—never before have I been so dissatisfied with a new Mac that I returned it out of frustration on multiple fronts: ergonomics and performance and compatibility headaches, and very poor value.

Apple claims a hugely successful launch of the 2016 MacBook Pro, a claim that presumably is true, but one has to wonder why discounts up to $200 are already seen less six weeks after launch. That’s unprecedented for a Mac as far as I can recall.

Apple Insider writes in MacBook 2016 Review – It’s going back:

I simply couldn’t type accurately on the 13" MBP because of the over-sensitive trackpad and Touch Bar – which I constantly engaged with an errant palm graze or finger overshooting the keyboard. It’s distracting as hell to be typing away into a note, doc or email and suddenly “click” on the window of a background app and switching contexts. Then I’d have to figure out what I was doing, where my window went, switch back to it, and try to pick up where I left off.

Accidental and sudden context switches are productivity killers and at the end of the day, I need my MacBook to be a productivity machine, not a productivity killer.

These comments mirror my frustration with the touchbar as well as the comments in the film-makers’s review. I avoided trackpad issues in part because I connect and use a mouse intead of the trackpad but that won’t be the case on the road.

Boil this all down to its root: Apple design for both software and hardware have become productivity killers as in Apple Core Rot. That characterization is too kind really, but it is the essence of the problem. It is incredibly dismaying that Apple no longer understands elegance of design, which is productivity enhancing hardware and software synergy, not a repudiation of functionality in favor of thinner/lighter/ostensibly “elegant” design. Apple now designs old-West false-front stores—beautiful eye candy, new features that I’d pay to remove, and at the cost of functionality.

Below, the 2015 Apple MacBook Pro is a winner, and a top-spec model sells for far less than the 2016 MacBook Pro. Its plus and minus is lack of Thunderbolt 3. The 2014 model is also good, but just slightly slower.

Performance Package for Mac Pro or iMac 5K
For iMac 5K or For 2013 Mac Pro
Recommended by diglloyd as ideal for photographers and videographers

Even ”Enterprise Grade” Drives Fail

It’s called Mean Time Between Failure because it’s awfully mean of an enterprise-grade hard drive to fail in less than 13 months. Happy New Year to you too, HE8.

Seriously, “mean” is average, as in Mean (average) Time Between Failure (MTBF). Drives fail, and while an enterprise drive might last 5 years, it might like to fail in one year, as shown below. As in mean time to failure—an average.

I’ve been running the HGST Ultrastar He8 8TB hard drives in a 4-way RAID-0 stripe for just over a year—see my in-depth review of the HGST 8TB Ultrastar He8 hard drive. I’ve been very pleased with the performance and low noise level.

A drive failure is luck of the (mean) draw. VERY bad luck in this case, given the remarkable 0.00% annualized failure rate for HGST 8TB drives stated at BackBlaze.com (exact same model number). The longer term failure rate (see link) is 2.7% for the HGST He8 HUH728080ALE600 across 26953 drive days: 2 failures total but it’s unclear how many drives.

Failure rate from BackBlaze.com for HGST He8 HUH728080ALE600 8TB hard drive, Q3 2016
Failure rate from BackBlaze.com for hard drives, Q3 2016

A big plus of SoftRAID is its advance warning of impending drive failure, as shown below. See the OWC blog post on drive failure, with Tim Standing’s video presentation as well as BackBlaze hard drive stats for Q3 2016.

OWC is unique in that if you get a failing drive like this on a Thunderbay RAID, we’ll RMA it and replace it.

Even with this awesome warranty policy, MPG recommends a cold spare, because shipping takes time. In my case I do not keep a cold spare, but I do have 4 “warm” spares each of which are single-drive backups, so I will just scavenge one of them.

Continues below...

SoftRAID detecting an about-to-fail hard drive

Checking drives before putting into “production”

SoftRAID has a superb 'certify' command which is excellent, and MPG recommends using it.

However, diglloydTools DiskTester fill-volume command can test 99% of the drive and graph the behavior, as shown below, where 5 samples were tested simultaneously, and then graphed together to verify consistent performance—important for RAID setups.

Over the years I have found that aberrant performance behaviors (obvious in a graph) are often an excellent predictor of flaky drives. The test-reliability command is good too, with the major benefit of being able to operate on in-use drives—no need to take a system down for days to certify (which means having to completely wipe) the drives.

Performance across 8TB capacity of HGST 8TB Ultrastar He8, 5 samples

Verifying data after moving/copying it

diglloydTools

Steps in doing a major data transfer/conversion/fix:

  1. Bring all hashes up to date with diglloydTools IntegrityChecker using the update command.
  2. After cloning or copying over the data from the backup or old volume to the new, run IntegrityChecker verify to verify 100% bit-for-bit data integrity.

Below, the summary output for the two volumes I had to redo, ArchivePV and Archive. The one missing file is just some temp file, so it is of no importance. Content did not change in any files totaling about 6.5TB of data.

======================================================
ic verify ArchivePV
2016-12-30 at 09:15:40
======================================================
# Files with stored hash: 104968
# Files missing: 1
==================
# Files hashed: 104967
# Files without hashes: 0
# Files whose size has changed: 0
# Files whose date changed: 0
# Empty files: 1
# Files whose content changed (same size): 0
# Suspicious files: 0
...
======================================================
ic verify Archive (summary)
2016-12-30 at 11:29:30
======================================================
# Files with stored hash: 197325
# Files missing: 1
# Files hashed: 197324
# Files without hashes: 0
# Files whose size has changed: 0
# Files whose date changed: 26
# Empty files: 1
# Files whose content changed (same size): 0
# Suspicious files: 0
NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc!

Great Deal on 13" MacBook Pro

A few days ago I wrote about Which 13-inch 2016 MacBook Pro? (or MacBook), where I argued in favor of the non-touchbar model.

Taxes Reminder: Section 179 for Small Business Owner: Deduct if In-Service by End Of Year.

So here are some excellent deals on an outstanding configuration of the 13" model sans touchbar and with all the right trimmings: 16GB memory, 512GB SSD, 2.4 GHz CPU.

More options below, or view/find MacBook Pro deals.

ALSO worth a look is the deeply discounted top-spec 2015 MacBook Pro. The 2015 MacBook Pro (15" model) is actually faster on some things than the 2016 top-spec model.

MacSales.com 'Area 51' Sale

See also B&H Photo Deal Zone Blowout.

OWC / MacSales.com has posted its Area 51 Year-End Blowout Sale.

The initial 51 include Thunderbolt RAIDs, Some nice Drive Enclosures, Great Cases, Power, Cables, Speakers, EarBuds, other goodies really priced to move. Items as low as One US Penny. Some past their heyday - some just with extra stock, some unexpected just to make it interesting.

First come, first serve, limited quantities of some items.

Mac Pro or iMac or MacBook Pro?
Storage, Backup, RAID?
Buy now or wait?

✓ diglloyd consulting starts you out on solid footing.

Which 13-inch 2016 MacBook Pro? (or MacBook)

UPDATE 28 Dec:

Two excellent deals on an outstanding configuration of the 13" model sans touchbar and with all the right trimmings: 16GB memory, 512GB SSD, 2.4 GHz CPU:

...

My oldest daughter will need a laptop for college next year, and so we went to the Apple Store to look at the 12" MacBook versus the 13" MacBook Pro.

She loved the 2 pound form factor of the MacBook, but I pointed out the dual ports, brighter/bigger better color and contrast and more pixels display, faster processor, better speakers, etc of the 13" MacBook Pro. And the superior ergonomics even if only just balancing on one’s lap (the MacBook is too small for that usage scenario).

All those benefits for 3 pounds versus 2 pounds and 3/4" dimensionally in both directions. But once a power brick is carried, the weight gap becomes less relevant. And either one fits easily into a daypack, and a 1 pound difference hardly matters when also carrying 10 pounds of textbooks and a water bottle and such.

Apple MacBook 1.2 Ghz / 8GB / 512GB for $999

The $999 Apple 12" MacBook Pro 8,1 1.2GHz / 512GB (at time this was written) is very appealing on a price basis, but if the budget allows for more, my thinking is that in terms of a 4 year lifespan for a college student, the argument is strongly in favor of the 13" 2016 MacBook Pro, particularly when the all but mandatory* $229 AppleCare extended warranty is included in the total system cost—the price differential in percentage terms is small when looking at a 4 year service life and in the context of what a college education costs. On the other hand, $999 gets you 512GB instead of 256GB internal SSD and in that 2 pound form factor.

* Apple laptops are “total failure” systems: due to soldered-on everything, the cost of repair beyond the pathetic one year warranty is prohibitive, although the toaster overn repair trick might work in certain cases. AppleCare is thus an all but mandatory purchase. If Apple quality is really superiro to other brands, then why doesn’t Apple stand behind its products with a 3 year warranty instead of the lowest-bar 1 year warranty?

Prelude

Apple considers the touchbar a feature, but it’s really a minefield anti-feature that is too often the source of errors and problems; I would pay extra to REMOVE the touchbar anti-feature in favor of real keys. The 13" model can be had without the touchbar.The 15" 2016 MacBook Pro has no such option, and all one can do is to program it to fixed keys, which are not in the right positions, and have no tactile consistency with the main keyboard.

Which 13" 2016 MacBook Pro model?

After seeing both the touchbar and non-touchbar models, I am strongly in favor of the NON-touchbar model* because it has several advantages:

  • Superior value: the price escalates rapidly with the touchbar model.
  • A slotted/removable SSD which ought to be upgradeable at some point, thus keeping the cost reasonable by going with the 256GB SSD (the cost escalates rapidly over the base model). If more storage is needed, I expect that OWC will have an upgrade before too long. This is not possible with the touchbar model due to its soldered-on SSD.
  • Real keys for ESC and function keys. The touchbar is “unstable” eye candy, an anti-feature for serious use (touch ID excepted). If and when any app shows truly useful touchbar support for pro use, I may change my mind, but no Apple app has anything useful on the touchbar that I can see. Function keys are proven by years of use, fixed* and thus can be relied upon to be there, and always will be predictable with no surprises.

Bottom line is that the base model is least expensive while affording future storage expansion. The CPU speed is irrelevant for the uses discussed.

As for value, the Apple $200 upcharge for the soldered-on choice of 16GB vs 8GB (8GB more) is an obscenity that only Apple can get away when 32GB of iMac 5K memory is only $238 as I write this—that’s $3.3X more per gigabyte and when bought with a brand-new machine. But when soldered-on as with the Apple MacBook Pro, there is no upgrading later so the choice must be carefully considered up-front.

* I would pay extra on the 15" model to REMOVE the touchbar, but see 2016 MacBook Pro: Configuring the Touchbar Control Strip to Show All Function Keys.

A Slew of Discounts on Apple Macs, iPads

See also Taxes Reminder: Section 179 for Small Business Owners (Accelerated Depreciation): Deduct if In-Service by End Of Year.

B&H Photo shows a whole bunch of year-end discounts on Apple Macs:

Curiously, the Apple Mac Pro is not discounted.

Even more curious, the 2016 MacBook Pro is already discounted by amounts that normally occur only 6 to 9 months into the product cycle.

Used can be a good route also; OWC / MacSales.com:

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

Clean Dust Off Computer Innards for Longer Service Life

See also Reader Comment: “iMac is a ticking bomb sealed inside a locked aluminum showcase”.

Dusk can kill electronics by localized heat buildup.

The Apple iMac is a terrible design in this sense: it is difficult (just not feasible for most all users) to get at the internals to clean off dust, virtually guaranteeing an abrupt failure, typically of the video card. Worse, the tight iMac internals leave little room for error on cooling.

Not so with the Mac Pro, which really does have a 'genius' design for cooling. Even better, dust is easily removed, as shown below.

I use a combination of canned air and a powerful nozzle on a 1300 watt HEPA vacuum cleaner. Never make actual contact with the electronics. I maintain a 1/2" or so distance using a inch nozzle of about an inch in diameter (no brush!). That creates a suction powerful enough to suck off most dust, even the stringy stuff.

The vacuum cleaner not only can suck off most of the dust, but placed on top of the Mac Pro it can spin the Mac Pro fan to very high speeds sufficient to make it whine from the RPM, all the while spitting out clouds and clots of dust. This works for other fans in other computers also. It easily removes dust that dust off usually cannot dislodge. The dust off is mainly useful for nooks and crannies (keep the vaccuum cleaner running with the nozzle nearby to avoid contaminating your work environment).

I had not cleaned my 2013 Mac Pro for nearly a year. As seen below, significant buildup of dust can occur internal to a machine. The localized buildup of heat can be substantial when dust accumulates like this (a system failure can result from one tiny component). The image below is a mild example compared to what I used to see in my 2010 Mac Pro.

Dusty 2013 Mac Pro innards (cover removed)—but easily cleaned

Anon writes:

We use the EasyGo CompuCleaner - Electric Computer Blower for Electronic Devices – Alternative to Compressed Air or Canned Air with fantastic success! Just clean out the filter on the bottom after use, which take no more then 60 seconds.

Generally agree with you. I do this every year as IT manager where I work. Yesterday, my son and I blew out 30+ Mac Pro’s (2008 to 2013) models. Wearing face masks and googles. It was a dust storm!

One point of difference…. I read somewhere in the past not to blow fans to very fast rotation while cleaning as the bearings and fan design are not built for that rotation speed. Especially opposite direction to their normal turning. So while we blow them we are careful to not turn them like a jet engine.

MPG: Interesting option that looks very worthwhile in some cases. One issue is raising dust best not raised (outside the Mac), but with a vaccuum also running sucking in the dust it might work well to keep the dust down (I also have a large HEPA air filter I can run nearby).

Fans: forcing the fan to spin at extreme RPM for very long is not a good idea. Also, a vaccuum cleaner used as described spins the fans in the natural direction; a blower forces the fan the wrong direction. So don’t use a blower to spin the fans backward. Finally, the 2013 Mac Pro fan is presumably high-spec with good bearings, and not easily damaged.

Cycling

Reader Comment: “iMac is a ticking bomb sealed inside a locked aluminum showcase”

A fascinating essay on the viability of the Apple iMac for reliable longer term use.

See also Clean Dust Off Computer Innards for Longer Service Life.

Don H writes:

You wrote:

"The downsides of the iMac 5K are several: Inferior cooling ability and increased noise under loads that would make a Mac Pro barely audible; the iMac 5K is not suitable for sustained loads and not likely to survive sustained loads for the years I would expect a Mac Pro to chug along easily."

When the slim ‘supermodel’ iMacs came out I assessed their design and specs but instead bought a refurbed 2011 i7 model (the last iMac with an optical drive), in part for potential serviceability versus dealing with the glued-on screen of the later models. It has served me quite well but this past September the video card failed. Needless to say it was well past the Applecare contract so I was on my own for repairs. I’m still holding out for a refreshed Mac Pro (‘Waiting For Godot’) but in the meantime I want this machine to keep going.

After some online research I learned that certain components on the video card could become unsoldered if enough heat built up inside, which seemed to be the case for my machine. (The fans were spinning up more and more as it aged.) The solution was to either buy a replacement video card, which is economically unjustified, or to ‘re-flow’ the solder on the existing card. This is an interesting if completely risky process of removing the card and putting it in a pre-heated oven for ten minutes to melt the existing solder enough so that it can literally re-flow across the connections. Any cold-solder cracks would theoretically mend themselves. I had nothing to lose at that point, so I opened up the machine and followed the iFixit procedure on an iPad.

Now I have opened up and worked on just about every generation of Mac, starting with a Radius 68020 coprocessor upgrade on a Mac SE to a complete dismantling of a G4 PowerMac down to the bare chassis. Some of the best machines along the line were the wonderful Mac IIci (one screw held almost everything in place), NeXT Stations, and the entirely reasonable white PowerPC iMacs. But then there were some lemons from the Spindler years (I can’t even remember all the model numbers), and the newer aluminum iMacs that used every trick available to conceal their construction. I have also worked on laptops, which understandably require tightly-packed components and certain non-servicable parts. But the latest iMacs (and I presume MacBooks) that use glue for assembly are getting to be a bridge too far. In my view you really do need to set a count-down clock from purchase date to the last day of the AppleCare contract, because after that they might as well be considered disposable.

So opening up the 2011 iMac to repair the video card was hardly my first rodeo in that regard. The outer glass came off with the suction cups without a problem, but then it immediately became service-hostile. The screws around the perimeter of the screen are in recesses that open up into the innards of the machine, so a dropped screw could get irretrievably lost in one of the fans or crannies of the components, potentially destroying the machine when powered back up. The wires connecting the screen and other components are fragile and the connectors are tiny and difficult to separate. The screws come in multiple sizes which could get mixed up during re-assembly. Extracting the components themselves can be difficult with risk of breakage. As I said, I had nothing to lose at this point since the machine was already unusable, but I didn’t want to seal its fate with a repair-related mistake.

Eventually I removed the video card and baked it in our toaster oven to re-flow the solder joints, and after an equally-perilous re-assembly process plugged in the machine and pressed the power button. Amazingly (thank you, fearless YouTube guinea pigs who document this process!) the video signal had recovered and I’m writing this on that same machine.

Now getting to the iMac versus Mac Pro decision, after this experience I don’t want to buy another iMac again, unless the tear-downs show that the machines become serviceable again. But given Apple’s design inclinations, I doubt that will ever happen. Using adhesives and other one-way methods for assembly may be a good choice for disposable items. However for something with an otherwise long usable life but with a limited three-year maximum warranty, serviceability should be an integral part of the design. And I don’t think the current iMacs fit that description.

And there’s one other risk with the iMac, namely the tightness of internal components in regards to heat buildup. I know that each new chip generation brings lower power usage, but as long as there is still a fan in the machine there is the potential for dust accumulation. And ultimately I think that’s what happened to my iMac; when I opened it up there were clearly airflow restrictions caused by dust, which eventually caused the solder failure on the video card. The machine is not in a particularly dusty environment, but when Apple tests them before production I doubt they have multiple year’s worth of dust coating the heatsinks, etc. There’s only so much one can do with compressed air during routine cleaning so this is an intrinsic problem with the slim planar design.

This is why my next machine will be a Mac Pro. I don’t necessarily need all the processing power (although it’s certainly nice to have), but I have historically kept my machines for around six years before replacement, and I don’t want its life cut short because of premature heat failure and/or lack of serviceability. The Mac Pro, even with its flaws, holds out the possibility that its life can be extended by those inclined to get under the hood. The iMac, on the other hand, is a ticking bomb sealed inside a locked aluminum showcase.

MPG: My unease about the iMac as a 'pro' machine captured with some fascinating real-world repair experience.

Dust is indeed major concern over time, as it kills electronics. What if the environment is even a little dusty where killer dust' could accumulate in as short as few months with steady usage where the fans run heavily? My office is not particularly dusty, but it’s rather obvious that there is a lot more dust than one might think—just look any place the vacuum cleaner doesn’t normally reach, like under a few computer cables under my desk. The Mac Pro is easy to clean off any accumulated dust; the iMac is hopeless.

All of the above and more are why MPG has long recommended the Mac Pro as the only serious machine, that is, one that sees moderate to heavy use every day.

What does it say about commitment to 'green' or 'sustainable' products to build computers whose life is virtually guaranteed to be shorter than it could be? THAT aspect of environmental impact is ignored by Apple in the context of the whole 'green' discussion (see below). It’s a form of dishonesty, half truths about environmental impact: if a machine is designed so that it can reasonably be expected to run for 6 years instead of 3 (mean time to failure), all this puffery is just that. Particularly when the computing power of today’s iMac 5K is ample for at least 5 to 7 years—heck my kids are using 5-year-old laptops and they are much less powerful.

Lifespan? Disposable computers cause the creation of new ones, which have infinitely more environmental impact than having to buy a new one because of premature failure. No mention of lifespan here:

And it has earned the highest rating of Gold from EPEAT, which evaluates the environmental impact of a product based on how recyclable it is, how much energy it uses, and how it’s designed and manufactured.* iMac achieved a Gold rating from EPEAT in the U.S. and Canada.

Apple environmentally-friendly claims
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

Desired Features for a New Mac Pro

The late 2013 Mac Pro was a major changeover, eliminating nice features like internal hard drives, restricting memory slots 4 only, and in general being “semi pro”.

Here’s how Apple can carry the 2013 Mac Pro forward back to its roots, but modernized:

  • 8 memory slots accepting up to 256GB. Stretch goal: 12 memory slots for up to 384GB.
  • 12 Thunderbolt 3 ports, split across 3 busses.
  • Support for three external 5K displays.
  • Single outrageously bad-ass GPU, OPTIONAL 2nd GPU.
  • Internal SSD options of 1TB or 2TB or 4TB, option for 2nd SSD with same capacity options, running at 3 GB/sec.
  • Space for two internal hard drives, thus allowing 20TB internally in addition to the SSDs.
  • Nice to have: 4 USB3 ports to keep connectivity hassles down with useful legacy devices (mouse, keyboard, camera card readers, USB3 drives, etc).

All of this should be possible by increasing the diameter and height of the 2013 'tube' somewhat. What pro would give a damn if it becomes 10 inches in diameter instead of of 6 inches and/or 15 inches high instead of 10 inches?

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

Desired Features for a New iMac

The late 2015 iMac 5K was the first iMac that MPG could ever take seriously for photography, mainly because it could finally accept 64GB of memory (note: prices are rising on memory) but also because its GPU and 4GHz CPU outrun even the fastest Mac Pro on some tasks—a little faster or a little slower. A perfect trifecta of solidly competitive.

The downsides of the iMac 5K are several:

  • Inferior cooling ability and increased noise under loads that would make a Mac Pro barely audible; the iMac 5K is not suitable for sustained loads and not likely to survive sustained loads for the years I would expect a Mac Pro to chug along easily.
  • 4 CPU cores max.
  • 64GB memory limit was a huge move forward (vs 32GB), but the Mac Pro can take 128GB.
  • GPU memory for big jobs for video and similar.
  • Too few ports for robust workstation systems.

The limits above are not much of an issue for many users but they are very real for some pros, like myself: the 2013 Mac Pro has been 'bulletproof', quiet, and just darn solid with 8 cores of grunt.

See also Reader Comment: “iMac is a ticking bomb sealed inside a locked aluminum showcase”.

So here’s what I’d like to see Apple do to the iMac, not trying to make it into a Mac Pro, but to make it a more serious and more appealing machine. Call it the iMac Pro:

  • I see the lifespan of the iMac 5K as around 3 years, versus 5 years for a Mac Pro. Design a proper cooling system that can handle sustained full CPU and GPU load without so much noise. It doesn’t inspire longevity confidence with the current model. The tiny venting area at the rear of the machine is sacrificing form for function: there is no reason that a vertical venting system could not be designed in, though it might make the machine slightly thicker. Nor is there any reason that venting has to be limited to one small porthole area.
  • iMac 6K display in 32" form factor (stretch goal iMac 8K in 36" form factor), that is, build on the primary strength, of being the best display available today for sheer viewing pleasure. Stretch goal: more vertical pixels more amenable to 3:2 and 4:3 images (eg what virtually all cameras produce). Update: aside from cost, it now appears than a 32-inch iMac 8K is technically feasible.
  • Offer a 6 core CPU at a high clock speed. Six cores is a sweet spot, saving the day when jobs are running in the background and/or on big Photoshop or Lightroom jobs, etc. This might require another generation of lower power chips however.
  • A truly bad-ass GPU (which would be needed for a 6K display anyway). The limit here would be power dissipation, but something 2X faster should be achievable.
  • Don’t create connectivity nuisances: dual Thunderbolt 3 busses with eight ports, or at least 6 ports.
  • Stretch goal: six and preferably 8 memory slots accepting up to 128GB: don’t make me pay a huge premium for ultra high density modules.

Some of the above may require more time, such as the availability of 6K or 8K displays, a 6-core CPU with the same TPD as the current 4 GHz 4 core CPUm sufficient memory densities. And it might be that Intel simply won’t straddle the pro/consumer boundary with a 6-core CPU (which is often wasted anyway). And in the end, an iMac is an iMac, and these features are desirable mainly in the context of a 6K display—so let it be an iMac.

Aside from having a poorly engineered cooling approach, the top-end iMac may be left that way—as an iMac, with the Mac Pro the logical place to stuff all these goodies. Still, there are ways to move the iMac forward that build on its core all-in-one strengths.

  • Improved cooling system, perhaps with separate fans/cooling venting on CPU and GPU and memory, for cooler and quieter operation and better longevity: a focus on longevity and reliabilty over time. This stuff could be folded into the case design without ruining the aesthetics.
  • Six Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C ports, ideally on two busses.
  • High-quality sterio speakers.
  • A built-in touchbar—a bonus given that real function keys are a good thing, and the touchbar really ought to supplement function keys, not replace them.
  • Option for 2TB SSD
  • 6K display in a new 32" form factor with GPU about twice as fast. That would make for a 30-way lineup of an iMac 21.5" 4K, iMac 27" 5K, iMac 32" 6K.
Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

iTunes and iPhone: Which Phone?

I’m glad I ordered a 256GB iPhone 7 Plus because otherwise how would I tell them apart?

I can’t figure out how to change the name of the phone, so (this is not a joke), I have to look at how much memory is indicated. Or, maybe the joke is on me.

I’ve tried right-clicking on just about everything for a Rename command, I’ve looked in Info, I’ve looked in the menus, etc. No dice.

Good design does not make people (like me) feel stupid not being able to do a trivial thing. iTunes.app has dozens of user interface design problems and a willful behavior of reverting to its ad-like music/app pimping pages (which I never use). I consider it a poster child for bad user interface design.

Update: see solution below.

As shown, I can tell by the phones apart by memory capacity. But that’s only if I click on the tiny little phone icon. Otherwise, the nitwit software shows the same icon for two totally different phones.

How to tell iPhones apart, aside from memory capacity?

Solution

Changing name of iPhone or iPad

Here is the solution, obvious after one knows it (and buried in the kitchen sink dumping ground landfill that is Settings). On the iPhone itself:

Settings > General > About > Name

I received a large number of emails on how to to this. They are interesting and fall into two categories:

  • The “here is how” ones. Thank you everyone.
  • The rationalizing-away of poor design: I’m wrong to expect simple things to be simple.

With respect to the rationalization category: the entire iPhone setup is controlled by iTunes (app data, apps, music, etc), so why can't the name of the device be changed right there too? In prior iTunes versions, one could rename the phone right there in iTunes—just like renaming a file in the Finder—not any more. Finally, what possible justification is there for making a simple thing complicated, particularly when it was not complicated in prior versions of iTunes?

Rationalizing away poor design is how stuff gets crappier, not better.

That a web page is needed to explain how to do it is proof that it’s not obvious. Why should I or anyone else have to be puzzled and waste time on things that ought to be self-evident? Good design makes things work in line with expectations, and does not present mysteries to be solved.

Curiously, only one reader (David B) in a dozen or so found the easy solution in iTunes. Which is proof again of how obtuse the design of iTunes is. It even had me fooled, knowing had done so before in iTunes. It only works on this particular display page in iTunes:

Renaming iPhone in iTunes

It is “little” things like this, and a thousand other tiny nicks and cuts that have degraded the usability experience of the iPhone in recent years. The iPhone v1 was a self-evident device from a usability standpoint. Today, iOS it is a mine field of behaviors and hidden things that require a large investment of time to find and understand. I had that experience last night—unexplained behavior I could not reproduce, nor could any of my kids do so (and they all have iPhones). I finally figured it out—after 10 minutes. That is very, very bad design. Sometimes my iPhone goes into inverted screen mode for no apparent reason—surely something I’ve done somehow—but I can’t figure out how fix it or what I did to invoke it. And Settings does not work because when it’s off it’s on and when it’s on it’s off (Accessibility). I should not have to become an anti-mine specialist to safely use my iPhone minefield without getting taken down by inexplicable user interface behavior.

While we’re on the usability topic, why can’t I customize-away all the cruft I never use? Why is it that buttons for controlling sound playback are tiny, with most of the screen occupied by a generic image for the album: 80% of the screen wasted on a generic image for 500 hours of my audio books, none of which have any image? Or that that the shuffle button is all too easy to press for an audiobook (now THAT is as idiotic as it gets). Or that the iPhone forgets my current track upon certain activities. The iPhone is the Emperor with No Clothes. Today, it has a user interface that fails basic usability in so many ways, but so many people are 'invested' in it that they have become blind to its glaring faults. As has Apple. Add in buggy iCloud behavior of numerous kinds and really annoying basic bugs, like getting some types of text messages twice? iOS is the new Windows.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

2016 MacBook Pro: Design by Dilettantes?

MPG has reviewed the 2016 MacBook Pro, having purchased the most bad-ass configuration and found it falling short of expectations in every way relevant to real world pro photographer usage*. While it has a few marginal plusses, it is not a pro machine and its $5000 price (with AppleCare and dongles and taxes) delivers more hassles with no better performance than its 'bulletproof' 2013 predecessor (a little better or a little worse, depending). It is the first Mac so far that I have returned with no regrets whatsoever.

* Who the heck needs a $5000 or even $3000 laptop other than a professional? So why does Apple build a non-professional dilettante machine?

Here is another professional viewpoint, from a film-maker’s perspective:

The New MacBook Pro: The Complete Filmmaker Review

None of this is an accident; Phil Schiller is a Marketing Bozo (see Guy Kawasaki for what that means), and Tim Cook can’t get his messaging straight, evidence that he is clueless about professional needs. He is the CEO, so the buck stops with him.

I think if you're looking at a PC, why would you buy a PC anymore? No really, why would you buy one?” — Tim Cook

Some folks in the media have raised the question about whether we’re committed to desktops,” Cook wrote. “If there’s any doubt about that with our teams, let me be very clear: we have great desktops in our roadmap. Nobody should worry about that.” — Tim Cook.

Somehow, these two quote do not inspire confidence or hope. Mr. Cook, which one is it, pray tell? Or don’t you know? And a roadmap is a piece of paper (so to speak), not a team of motivated engineers working right now looking to re-invent “great”.

And... what is the roadmap? So much secrecy Mr. Cook, and pros despise not knowing if Apple will hang them out to dry one more time. Final Cut Pro was properly abandoned by most pros, who were hung out to dry there. Hardware is the nail in the coffin, so I hope Mr Cook doesn’t think a thinner iMac with a touchbar and touchscreen and soldered-on memory and SSD and a better FaceTime camera is the ticket.

Tim Cook’s quotes are actually very clear messaging, that is, meta messaging as in “I don’t have a clue what professionals need or want”. As in that’s why you (professionals) are frustrated/pissed off/baffled/infuriated by what Apple has done or not done for 3-4 years now. Including Apple Core Rot, a shameful show of incompetence in software development. Three years now: the 2016 MacBook Pro, the Mac Pro that never was “pro” and has seen zero changes, and these quotes tell a plenty clear story: neglect and irrelevance. And my 14-year-old thinks iPhones kind of suck. Nice combination for steady decline, and worth thinking about as an Apple investor (I’m not). But... there is always a potential turnaround story, that is, a return to visionary thinking coupled to eyes-wide-open thinking about pro needs, to anchor the whole lineup.

The iPhone... it was a work of genius and vision at its initial debut, but when its essential elements are considered, it has not improved and instead is devolving away from the core elements that made it great: it’s getting very complex to use, a software problem. A “pretty face” in a new iPhone is all we get now; the software gets buggier and harder to use and still cannot customize away all the visual and actual crapware.

What also worries me: Jony Ive might feel the need to express his creative side for desktop machines—a worst case scenario for pro users, perhaps!

BTW, Apple has NEVER contacted MPG, and that is weird in itself, if only because I don’t think Apple does its homework with all the pros out there that just might know something useful. I invite Mr. Cook to lunch with me, at my expense, as just one voice that can offer a perspective. But maybe Apple has no comittment to understanding professional needs, having enough internal 20-something-year-old focus groups to figure out just how big a (nearly useless) touchbar and too-large touchpad should be. But at least talk to film-makers and pro photographers, if not MPG and so many other professionals out there. Here’s a simple fact that ought to change: the web sites that get favor are those that get the pre-release Macs for cheerleader reviews. Go Apple, you rock!

Ira W writes:

I'm returning my 2016 MBP as well. I have a Photoshop action that I typically run on all of my images that sets up a variety of curves to add contrast and color and calls a few tools within the Camera Raw Filter.

On my new 2016 MBP it takes *longer* to run than on the 2013 MBP it was supposed to replace. I wound up getting a 2015 refurb instead which runs the action faster -- 17 seconds with the 2015 model where it takes 21-22 seconds with the 2016 model. That's a 25% slowdown! I suspect it's either due to Sierra or (as you've suggested) bad GPU drivers.

I waited for 10.12.2 to come out but it didn't help performance at all. In fact, it may even have made things slightly worse.

MPG: good independent confirmation of the test results in the MPG review of the Apple 2016 MacBook Pro. The 2015 model looks like the one to have for Photoshop users, and the 2015 model also has a fast SSD. But anyone with a 2013/2014/2015 model should just stick with it barring some *specific* known and tested gain with the 2016 model.

Don H writes:

I certainly share your pain with the general direction Apple is taking, and run into many of the same usability hassles. But barring some sort of massive corporate intervention at Apple things will likely get worse with each passing year.

As I’ve mentioned in previous emails, I keep some older machines around running earlier versions of OS X, both for legacy applications as well as for last-known-working versions of iTunes, etc. The machines and earlier versions of Mac OS were certainly great when they came out, and are still pretty damned good today - for the tasks that they were designed to do.

However, the world doesn’t stand still and we get some fresh improvements and a lot of disappointments from Apple and the tech world in general. It’s a very difficult balance to work with, as you well know. But let’s assume the worst and Apple goes all-in across their product line towards the iOS model of functional restrictions, app lockdown, denial of downgrades, and eventually a 100% dependence on a ‘cloud' connection. Furthermore, their hardware continues to whittle down functionality to the point where only a super-iPad, iPhone, and Watch remain, and they further their practice of requiring all new software across the board with each product release - take it or leave it.

What would you do under such a scenario? Would you freeze your tech career to a certain point in time, or abandon it altogether? Certainly you can continue your photography with older equipment. It might not benefit from the latest CPUs (such that they are these days) or storage interface, but it’s still feasible until the hardware dies.

I’m not asking out of snark, because these are questions I ask of myself. I know of someone who worked in the automotive field his whole life and simply stopped buying new cars when they could no longer be maintained without a diagnostic computer. That was a threshold that pushed past his personal priorities, and he’s fine with running older models until he can no longer drive. (He also happens to be a car collector.)

I’d be curious to hear your long-term plans (without getting too maudlin) in an essay, and I bet others would too. These endless papercuts just seem to keep getting worse.

MPG: I (Lloyd) am more or less locked into new technology because I have to cover the latest camera gear (and computers here on this site). So my choices are not “free” in that, for example, I must use a version of Photoshop/ACR supporting the latest cameras. So far that has not been a problem, but it might be that if I chose to simply “sit” on one model Mac Pro with some OS version, I might be forced out of it just because of software support. At present, I could live with my current Mac Pro and iMac 5K and (ugghh) macOS Sierra more or less indefinitely—but the camera support issue would likely become a problem before the hardware reached EOL.

Windows is not an appealing option for numerous reasons =, with huge 'costs' going far beyond hardware and software (deep into experience, know how, habits, etc). Linux is good for servers, but problematic otherwise.

That said, I am not that pessimistic. I do believe that Apple will indeed deliver some very good desktops. While they might be compromised in various ways like the 2016 MacBook Pro, it seems unlikely that Apple will screw the pooch on the iMac or Mac Pro—a bridge too far—yet. So I think we professional users have at least a 5 year lease on computing life, if only with the current models and current macOS.

Mark A writes:

My comments here.

To which I linked in a comment to this article http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/12/tim-cook-promises-great-desktops-in-our-roadmap-after-a-desktop-free-2016/

I even offered Tim to help him. The lack of attention to detail is worrisome. The hardware is mostly lovely (setting soldered components aside), the software is not.

The lack of attention to creature comforts tells me nobody at Apple really cares or they'd have a software czar at the top of the house. I'd do it if they'd let me have the freedom across the spectrum from macOS to iOS to apps.

Here's one of my more annoying little creature comforts: I start every week on Mondays never Sundays. That's an anachronism I never understood, perhaps it's a Judeo Christian thing. In any case, in Calendar (and in Google Calendar since I use iCloud only for things Google can't or won't host properly like Notes and Reminders), I have weeks set to start on Monday. Not a single other stupid pop-up calendar they have supports anything other than Sunday weeks. This forces me to rethink on the fly how weeks "look" to select the right day. Little creature comforts add up to respect and thoughtfulness. I have a long, long list that I've been keeping as I got my first iPhone a few weeks ago, giving up the productivity of my museum-piece Blackberry. Some days, I'm exasperated enough to not bother writing down the next thing...

MPG: a spot-on expression of how the little things are big things. Part of my dismay (a large part) is indeed the disrespect Apple shows users, the reasons being arrogance or ignorance I don’t know at this point.

Kevin D writes:

Are we finally at the point to say goodbye to Apple the phone company?

Tim Cook is making Sculley look like a visionary, the Watch is a pointless product, and in the new MBP, making a product thinner and losing battery life in the process sounds like a clueless post mortem.

Ask any pro if they would prefer if Apple thickened the MBP by the amount they slimmed it in order to add battery life and more RAM capacity, and you would hear a resounding yes.

If they don’t want to work on PCs anymore, fine…sell it off to someone who does want to serve the market with intelligence and care. [MPG: see Reader Comment: Apple Pro Division?]

In your view, when is enough enough, and time for serious photographers to seek greener pastures???

Speaking as someone who at age 61 owned a Lisa, have bought hundreds of Macs over the years in my companies, was an Apple VAR and developer, and generally felt good about Apple and their solutions, it looks like they stopped giving a shit about pro users some time ago. Dropping Aperture for my operation was a blow, as I have over 400TB of images in that system. That to me said, we do not care about you or your business…none of this stuff make cash like the phones do…OK, say I, why not just dump it all??

Or, are we waiting to Apple to revamp Macs using its own chips, and revitalize the market??

Where do you sit in all this?

MPG: see also, now 3 years old, Reader Comments on Apple Core Rot. A trend once in motion stays in motion, until it ends. And there are no signs of ending.

First it was pro software: Aperture (discontinued), then Final Cut Pro (pros have abandonded it in droves due the the contempt Apple showed for pro users by having no compatibility across releases). Then small 'cuts', like the random destruction of iPhoto features that worked well, now morphed into a problematic Photos.app (it won’t even allow dragging an image to Photoshop, for starters), the utter destruction of Disk Utility leaving pros with RAID hung out to dry, and for 4 years now, the steady increase in in bugs in macOS coupled to arbitrary and idiotic eye candy changes and performance problems. Most recently, Apple Mail is just barely usable due to performance problems (impacting me negatively every day). All of which (and much more) shows disrespect not just to pro users, but anyone with actual work to do.

Apple’s actions are inciting a hollowing-out of the core user base, the loyal core user base and it will come back to haunt Apple. The inflection point was 2013. A course correction is increasingly difficult without corporate trauma, but not impossible.

Now comes the hardware onslaught. It’s not that the 2016 MacBook Pro is a bad machine; it is very good in many respects. It’s not that the touchbar cannot be useful; it’s that it substitutes proven useful design for a gimmick. On a hardware level, the 2016 MacBook Pro disrespects Pro users in multiple ways and for that reason it makes me queasy as to what’s coming down the pike, particularly with Tim Cook (surely a master manager, but showing no signs of vision of any kind, let alone insight into the pro market), Phil Schiller (a marketing bozo prone whose words are for the gullible and uninformed) and Craig Federighi (incompetent as far as I can tell, the person whose mission seems to be to destroy macOS). Nothing is going to get better with these people in charge.

Still, it’s like the United States: deeply flawed but no better country on earth. That’s where I stand with Apple, at least for the next year or two.

Mac Pro or iMac or MacBook Pro?
Storage, Backup, RAID?
Buy now or wait?

✓ diglloyd consulting starts you out on solid footing.

How to Remove Apple Crapware. Or Not, Thanks to Apple’s New Lockdown

I saw this comment in an online post:

Great, Apple loads your drive with, in my case, a lot of apps that I will never use but, thanks to Apples “father knows best”, I cannot remove and then decide which of my personal files should be deleted.

Why is 'Chess.app' a required application in macOS?

I never use Chess, FaceTime, Game Center, iBooks, iTunes, LaunchPad, Maps, PhotoBooth, Boot Camp, Grab, or Grapher.

But Apple says that the’re part of the OS and cannot be removed. There used to be a work- around for that but it’s gone too.

Apple seems to feel that whatever outrageous price we have paid for our computers they must still belong to Apple.

DIGLLOYD: this behavior is something relatively new in macOS, part of locking down system security. However, MPG agress that it is inappropriate and offensive to foist unwanted crapware on users, particularly apps taking multiple gigabytes like Garbage Band*. Moreover, it is idotic to push cloud-based “savings” while prohibiting much more straightforward removals of unwanted software. It might be possible to boot into safe mode after disabling system integrity protection, and get it done in Terminal—maybe.

* Apps like Garage Band and Pages and so on can still be removed.

Along with soldered-on SSDs, it‘s clear that Apple is clueless about customer-centric design, that is, a design that suits the customer’s needs, not some nitwit’s arbitrary decision.

Can’t upgrade the SSD on many Macs and can’t delete crapware = buy a new Mac? That might be the unfortunate solution for those unlucky enough to have been suckered into a 128GB or 256GB SSD. External storage is a better choice, such as the elegant and silent solution: the OWC Envoy Pro EX). Or for upgradeable machines, the OWC SSD upgrades for MacBook Pro and other Macs.

The issue is not just space usage; it is also clutter and the ability to control one’s own computing environment as one sees fit.

Saving space other ways

For machines tight on space, savings space on unwanted apps can make a significant difference. For example saving up to 8.5GB with XCode, or saving 5GB or so with iTunes.

It’s offensive that Apple’s own utility for reclaiming space will not show any core Apple applications . Why is 'Chess' a core application that cannot be removed?

Managing Space Usage in System Information => Storage -> Applications
SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

Reader Comment: “Bloomberg piece goes hand-in-hand with today’s article that you posted”

Prelude: I was having an issue with my new iPhone 7 Plus: all touch functions went AWOL and I had to turn the phone off/on to restore—and this was a brand-new replacement for the other brand-new one! I mentioned the problem to my teenage daughter, whose response was spontaneously “iPhones are pretty crappy” (she has an iPhone 6). I was dumbfounded—when a teenager thinks that about iPhone, Apple had better hope it’s an anomaly.

The truth is, iPhones do suck in this way at least: the level of complexity is tenfold over the original, delivering little or no meaningful benefit for my uses since iPhone v1. Just try using the godawful kitchen sink mess that is Settings. Indeed, I rendered the iPhone 7 Plus inoperable for Settings by using search to find “Find my IPhone”. After finding it, nothing else would show (blank screen for settings regardless of up/down scrolling), making all settings inaccessible—I had to reboot the phone. And the iPhone is the product getting the lion’s share of development resources.

Shameer M writes in response to Computers Are not Getting Faster in a Meaningful Way, GPU is Half-Baked Tech, Too Many Software Developers Suck:

I think this Bloomberg piece goes hand-in-hand with the article that you posted:
How Apple Alienated Mac Loyalists: Inside the company, the once iconic computer is getting far less attention than it once did.

MPG: well, I am one of those 'alienated' loyalist professionals that Apple has been pissing off for at least three years now.

Properly understood, the Bloomberg article is a damning indictment of the cultural change at Apple, at least if one admires true excellence and great (not just good enough) product design. The article doesn’t speak to the metastasizing Apple Core Rot problem. Moreover, whatever Phil Schiller says is only for the gullible or uninformed.

While Tim Cook’s recent comments on terrific desktops in the works hold out some hope (at a risk of being burned yet again given his apparently dim understanding of professional needs), it is MPG’s view that macOS is now mostly developed by the “B” or “C” teams. The design and testing incompetence manifests itself just about everywhere: see the 3rd excerpted paragraph which dovetails with what my 30 years as software engineer senses in the issues with macOS.

Interviews with people familiar with Apple's inner workings reveal that the Mac is getting far less attention than it once did. They say the Mac team has lost clout with the famed industrial design group led by Jony Ive and the company's software team. They also describe a lack of clear direction from senior management, departures of key people working on Mac hardware and technical challenges that have delayed the roll-out of new computers.
...
In the run-up to the MacBook Pro's planned debut this year, the new battery failed a key test, according to a person familiar with the situation. Rather than delay the launch and risk missing the crucial holiday shopping season, Apple decided to revert to an older design. The change required roping in engineers from other teams to finish the job, meaning work on other Macs languished, the person said. The new laptop didn't represent a game-changing leap in battery performance, and a software bug misrepresented hours of power remaining. Apple has since removed the meter from the top right-hand corner of the screen.
...
In another sign that the company has prioritized the iPhone, Apple re-organized its software engineering department so there's no longer a dedicated Mac operating system team. There is now just one team, and most of the engineers are iOS first, giving the people working on the iPhone and iPad more power.
...
The internal turmoil has taken a toll. More than a dozen engineers and managers working on Mac hardware have left for different Apple teams or other companies in the past year and a half, said people familiar with the situation. Some were looking for a less all-consuming work environment, while others felt the future of Mac hardware was unclear in a world of iPhones and iPads.

Apple’s working model for both hardware and software is now “ship by calendar”, not “ship by quality and excellence”. That said, Apple’s products are in general very high grade. It’s just that I expect “great” from Apple, not just “very good”. With macOS, the decline in performance and the rise in bugs in macOS has reached an unacceptable level that is surely the result of the internal turmoil. It is sad to witness the steady decline and painful to have to deal with it on a daily basis.

Jim G writes:

Along with this, did you see that Consumer Reports for the first time didn’t recommend the MacBooks because of battery issues? There was also an article on the Macworld site a few days ago about an analyst who follows Apple saying that ultimately, he thinks Apple wants to be known as a services company.

Well, I felt alienated enough that now I have a PC sitting on my desk and I am in the process of transferring things over. I went to a local computer store looking for an adapter and started talking to them. They service both PC and Mac and while they like the way Macs are built, their opinion of Apple itself is that they don’t care about their customers. They also didn’t seem surprised at my decision to go PC.

In some ways as someone who has had Macs from the first 128k Mac, I have to say that it is a little heartbreaking to think that Apple has gotten to this point. They have a group of people in charge that haven’t got a clue of what Macs have stood for all this time. All they seem to care about are their iDevices and I sometimes think that if Macs weren’t such a part of their history, they might consider moving away from them altogether.

DIGLLOYD: dangerous sentiments (for Apple).

As noted above, Apple ships by calendar schedule and professional needs be damned: 10% better battery life in a “pro” model is a damned joke when it displaces 32GB memory or upgradeable SSD or whatever.

“Great” is no longer the #1 goal, if it is a goal at all—clearly in the computer space Apple offers nothing that is great, at least not for professional users, and I’d argue that while all Apple computers very very good, none are great regardless of the target user.

Which Camera System / Lenses Should I Get?
✓ Get the best system for your needs the first time: diglloyd photographic consulting.

How Can Apple Mail Possibly need 3.1 GB of Memory?

Not always, but sometimes Apple Mail uses an obscene amount of memory.

How it even possible for a competently written program whose task is to display a list of messages and little else gobble up 3.12GB of real memory? Or to take 20 seconds to show me my Sent box (all local messages). Or to rainbow beach ball for 3-4 seconds for any search, which makes it hard to even type in a short search phrase.

The answer of course is that Apple Mail engineers are incompetent. Every day my usage of Apple Mail is degraded by the bugs I discussed two macOS update releases ago. The VIP features has been broken for two major OS releases. Apple Mail is swiss-cheesed with bugs, and the severe performance problems and this excessive memory usage are just symptoms of the metastasizing Apple Core Rot (software and hardware) disease.

Apple Mail memory usage

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

Memory and SDD/Flash Prices on the Rise

MPG recently noticed that the cost of an iMac 64GB memory upgrade kit has risen from $698 to $799, a 14% price rise. Here is some insight from OWC / MacSales.com:

It's a perfect storm with sustained traditional demands, but with substantial growth in mobile consumption due to a doubling of both memory and flash per device carrying the year.

Tightness was already forming - add to that the new 3D flash geometries that are still coming up in yield while changing over from previous traditional MLC and TLC standards on the flash side + DDR4 taking some capacity from DDR3v lines. All of this has created a substantial demand increase and supplies that are behind that curve.

Supply is likely to to be under pressure with accompanying costs to continue to increase for the next 2-5 months on NAND flash before normalizing and going into a cost per GB decline, ast least that is what seems likely. Memory may stabilize here in 6-12 weeks, but it is questionable if memory prices will come back down soon, looking at demand and capacity to produce.

See also all memory upgrade options.


ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

OWC 40TB SSD Performance as Photoshop Scratch Drive

The Thunderbay 4 Mini RAID-5 edition is available with SSDs in capacities from 1TB to 40TB. MPG strong recommends the RAID edition.

Thunderbay 4 Mini configurations (non RAID) are also available, as well as hard drive configurations are also available.

The OWC 40TB SSD offers unprecedented external SSD performance across its enormous capacity, as the other tests show.

To assess the real-world performance with Photoshop, the diglloydHuge benchmark was utilized; it exceeds the available 64GB memory and thus its run time is strongly influenced by how fast the scratch drive can swap data.

OWC 40TB SSD: Performance as Photoshop Scratch Drive

An appropriate comparison is to the very fast internal PCIe SSD in the 2013 Mac Pro. As shown, there is a meaningless 1% performance difference, showing that not only does the OWC 40TB SSD bring huge capacity to the table, but it also offers high grade SSD performance—and when Thunderbolt 3 arrives on a Mac Pro, a OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini enclosure should deliver even better results.

 
Performace on diglloydHuge Photoshop Benchmark: OWC 40TB SSD vs Interal 1TB Mac Pro SSD
Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

Taxes: Section 179 for Small Business Owners (Accelerated Depreciation): Deduct if In-Service by End Of Year

This site is not a tax adviser, this is FYI ONLY. Consult your own tax adviser. See also Section 179.org.

For a small business owner, the US federal tax code contains a benefit: Section 179 of the internal revenue code.

In essence, you can write off (fully deduct) depreciable assets acquired and put into service in 2016 as expenses up to a limit of $500,000 (for federal tax purposes). Any small business that needs a new computer, office gear, camera, or any normally depreciable asset might consider making those purchases (and putting them into service) that gear by Dec 31, 2014.

2016 Deduction Limit = $500,000 — This deduction is good on new and used equipment, as well as off-the-shelf software. This limit is only good for 2016, and the equipment must be financed/purchased and put into service by the end of the day, 12/31/2016.

See my OWC / MacSales.com Wishlists and B&H Photo wishlists.

Suggested items at OWC

 

OWC Easy SSD Upgrade Guide
MacBook Pro and MacBook Air
iMac, Mac Pro, MacMini, more!

Computers Are not Getting Faster in a Meaningful Way, GPU is Half-Baked Tech, Too Many Software Developers Suck

See also: Reader Comment: “Bloomberg piece goes hand-in-hand with today’s article that you posted”.

I happened to be thinking about how well my 2013 Mac Pro serves my needs—very well now for nearly three years, edging out the late 2015 iMac 5K most of the time, or being edged out slightly some of the time.

On the other hand, my most frequent task of creating lens rendering aperture series takes up to 5 minutes at a go, and I do that a lot. I would really like to see that process run 2X to 3X faster. (well, 10X faster). But after three years, the improvement in CPU speed is little better than a rounding error, laptop or desktop (and Apple has made zero speed improvement on the Mac Pro, not even bothering to offer the incrementally faster CPUs).

SSD speed now exceeds the needs of virtually all programs, memory capacity is rarely a real limitation on most all tasks, and memory speed is not a constraining factor for most tasks. The CPU is too often the limit.

Which brings me to two general points.

First, CPU performance is maxed out with little sign of any major gains on the horizon. While incremental gains are seen in dribs and drabs in the laptop and desktop space, performance has hit a wall and it sure doesn’t look like that’s going to change any time soon. Gone are the days of a 25% boost in speed when a new Mac comes out. While the GPU has contributed some benefits, those benefits range from non-existent to spotty and sporadic (certain specialty programs excepted). And programs using the GPU tend to crash; GPU support is too often a science fair project that cannot be used reliably*. The lack of speed gains are not just a Mac thing; PCs might be overclocked for some incremental gain (4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz is a yawner), there are no 10GHz or 20GHz CPUs in any Mac or Windows PC.

* Photoshop crashes with GPU enabled, unable to complete recent MPG testing, Sigma Photo Pro crashes 100% of the time with GPU support enabled, for several years now, display quality is degraded with GPU enabled at certain scaling factors. Ad nauseum: the GPU is a half-baked technology.

Second, many if not most programs could run much faster if software developers did not suck. Some don’t suck, but many do. For example, why can’t I sharpen 10 layers in parallel in Photoshop with one command? Instead, the sharpening has to be invoked layer by layer, which is even worse: the effort is serialized by human-driven actions (even my scripts cannot run in parallel given Photoshop’s serialized operational design). There is something irritating about highly intelligent people being dumb as hell when it comes to obvious things.

15-year-old inertial thinking is killing software performance. In at least some cases.

In other cases, it’s just design by nitwits—taking a more mundane example, why does Apple Mail lock me out with no response and/or a rainbow beachball while using one CPU going at 100% for 3 to 20 seconds, or prevent typing for 3-5 seconds while searching? It’s brain-dead incompetence in software engineering.

There is a whole range of poorly done software out there (in performance terms), but it all boils down to a failure to see what’s right in front of them. A curious blindness. So maybe it is a Russian plot!

OWC ThunderBay 4 20TB RAID-5 $1299!
4TB to 40TB, configure single drives or as RAID-5, RAID-0, RAID-10.
Now up to a whopping 40 Terabytes

Refurbished Mac Deals at OWC/MacSales.com

MacSales.com (OWC) sells many Apple factory refurbished Macs. As far as MPG is concerned, these are the best deals going—Lloyd buys Apple factory refurbished Macs whenever feasible.

Apple factory refurbished Macs at OWC.

Why pay full fare at Apple? Selected deals shown below; selection changes regularly.

Nancy P writes:

How reliable are factory refurbished Apple laptops? (MacSales) Is there any chance of malware? I assume that the machines are checked out before leaving the refurbish area in the factory. I routinely get factory refurbished lenses, etc from Canon website - happy.

... After I emailed you I saw that MacSales and OWC are same company, I have liked OWC stuff in past.

MPG: Lloyd always buys Apple certified refurbished whenever possible, since they have been as good as new in all past experience. That said, when a new Mac comes out and MPG needs to report on, buying new is the only option (can’t wait 3-4 months).

Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

Mac Deals at B&H Photo

B&H Photo is an authorized Apple dealer.

View all Apple deals that are 8% or more off.

Why pay full fare at Apple? Selected deals shown below.

NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc!

Two-Factory Security for macOS

MPG recommends using two-factor security whenever possible. Kudos to Apple for doing it well in macOS with respect to iCloud sign-in.

In two factor authentication, the first “factor” is the traditional username + password.

With Apple’s approach, the second factor is a 6 digit code that is sent to your iPhone via SMS. This temporary code must be entered in order to complete sign in on the new device:

AppleTwo-Factor Security: 6 digit text message on iPhone

If another Mac is running, this dialog lets you know that your (or someone else) has now signed in with your Apple ID. Being notified when a hacker logs into one’s account is a terrific feature. An email is also sent.

AppleTwo-Factor Security: notification of sign in

Similar features

First, it’s just stunning that not many banks or brokerages have their act together enough to offer something this clean and easy to use; a few have systems that require a separate dongle or similar but this is just not acceptable to me (having to carry one dongle per institution is insanity).

MPG recommends these related items:

  • Authy app for iPhone. Can be used with sites like Coinbase.com.
  • Chase Bank: set account to send SMS notifications to phone when any charge is made, thus making it obvious if a fraud is in progress (say with a stolen credit card).
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

macOS 10.12.2 Update

MPG installed macOS 10.12.2 on three Macs: 2013 Mac Pro, 2013 MacBook Pro, 2015 iMac 5K. The iMac 5K install hung and had to be forcibly restarted (just like with macOS 10.12.1).

Apple has issued macOS 10.12.2, a good thing, and also demonstration of the “ship it and then fix it” mentality at work with Apple Core Rot—the second update in less than 3 months.

About the macOS Sierra 10.12.2 Update

This update is recommended for all macOS Sierra users.

  • The macOS Sierra 10.12.2 Update improves the stability, compatibility, and security of your Mac, and is recommended for all users. This update:
  • Improves setup and reliability of Auto Unlock.
  • Allows addition of a Chinese Trackpad Handwriting button to the Touch Bar Control Strip.
  • Adds support for taking screenshots of the Touch Bar using the Grab app or Command-Shift-6 shortcut.
  • Fixes an issue that caused the Touch Bar emoji picker to appear on the display.
  • Resolves graphics issues on MacBook Pro (Late 2016) computers. [MPG: Apple could try a new strategy: hold off ship product when both hardware and software are ready for market]
  • Fixes an issue where System Integrity Protection was disabled on some MacBook Pro (Late 2016) computers
  • Improves setup and opt-out experience for iCloud Desktop and Documents. [MPG considers this a solution in search of a problem that may be hazardous to your data as well as a privacy and security hazard].
  • Fixes an issue with the delivery of Optimized Storage alerts.
  • Improves audio quality when using Siri and FaceTime with Bluetooth headphones.
  • Improves the stability of Photos when creating and ordering books.
  • Fixes an issue where incoming Mail messages did not appear when using a Microsoft Exchange account.
  • Fixes an issue that prevented installation of Safari Extensions downloaded outside the Safari Extensions Gallery.
  • Adds support for new installations of Windows 8 and Windows 7 using Boot Camp on supported Macs.
  • Fixes an issue that prevented some screen resolutions from being available on third-party displays.
  • Adds support for more digital camera RAW formats.

It looks like slow File Open and File Save dialogs are now art of the permanent performance clusterf**k since macOS 10.12.2 is now even slower (3 or 4 seconds for File Save dialog). Why the geniuses at Apple cannot make basic things work like they always used to work is mind boggling. Two steps forward, three steps back.

As for iCloud storage, below is MPG’s recommendation given the destruction of backup protocols it entails (and other reasons). At any rate, Apple’s maximum available storage option is not only a rip-off but about 1/20 of what Lloyd would need for “all”.

Apple’s iCloud Storage Optio: “All your files in iCloud”

Security

There are also various security updates including Safari security fixes and macOS security fixes.

That macOS is not immune from serious security breaches, particularly by a sophisticated hacker or government with a targeted exploit should be clear from the partial list below. Worse, the more Apple adds crapware to the core OS, the more vectors are created for a breach.

The term “arbitrary code execution” means that you are screwed, totally. Just a few examples:

  • Core Foundation: Processing malicious strings may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution
  • CoreGraphics: Processing a maliciously crafted font file may lead to unexpected application termination
  • CoreMedia External Displays: A local application may be able to execute arbitrary code in the context of the mediaserver daemon.
  • CoreText: Processing a maliciously crafted font file may lead to arbitrary code execution.
  • curl: An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to leak sensitive user information
  • Disk Images: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges
  • IOKit: An application may be able to read kernel memory
  • Kernel: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges
  • Power Management: A local user may be able to gain root privileges
  • Security: Certificates may be unexpectedly evaluated as trusted
  • ...

Kudos to Apple for aggressively fixing security bugs. But MPG would like to see performance/reliability security be the ONLY focus of macOS 10.13—no new crapware, no new features.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

How much SSD Can You Handle?

How about a forty (40) terabyte SSD?

While 40TB is a jaw-dropping amount of SSD storage, bite off as much as you can financially chew for performance that is throttled by Thunderbolt 2.

It should do about 1650 MB/sec when a Thunderbolt 3 version of the OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini enclosure arrives (just swap the SSDs), though that hardly matters given how it flatlines at 1360 MiB/sec = 1425 MB/sec.

See my review of the OWC 40TB SSD.

NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc!

Malware Hides in Advertising

This site has never and will never use an ad network or javascript code for 3rd party advertisements.

This is a chilling development. It means that your computer (and thus money and privacy) could be compromised by ads on a web site you visit.

Bruce Schneier reports in his security blog WWW Malware Hides in Images:

For the past two months, a new exploit kit has been serving malicious code hidden in the pixels of banner ads via a malvertising campaign that has been active on several high profile websites.

...

Since a large number of advertising networks allow advertisers to deliver JavaScript code with their ads, the crooks also included JS code that would parse the image, extract the pixel transparency values, and using a mathematical formula, convert those values into a character.

Delivering javascript code with ads is inherently a Very Bad Idea. As in a what were these idiots thinking idea. Ads with extra javascript are all about compromising your privacy for starters (at their most benign) and draining your bank accounts (worst case).But that’s what ad networks do to make a buck.

What a shame that the genius (evil genius) of malware developers is not put to work in positive ways. I also wonder how long Google’s ad revenues might last in the context of such exploits. It is a very strong argument for ad blockers.

2016 MacBook Pro: Cannot Sustain Performance Under Load — Update

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Update 13 December: the MacBook Pro has gone back to Apple, so MPG cannot retest, but it might be that the macOS 10.12 update fixes the performance issues.

...

A few days ago I reported that the MacBook Pro performance quickly degraded in Photoshop. This curiosity bore no explanation did not settle with with me, nor did an external fan have any effect on performance (the “too hot” theory). So I kept thinking about it.

Another fact comes to bear: three of the Macs could not complete the Photoshop Lens Filter test some or all of the time, and two could never complete it.

Recall that the 2013 Mac Pro had awful GPU driver bugs for the first six months or so of its debut—Apple does a lousy job testing GPU driver support. [Well, a lousy job on just about everything, as MPG has shown repeatedly in a series of Apple Core Rot posts and articles.]

Accordingly this seems like a GPU driver bug is at work, perhaps introduced in macOS Sierra, and having nothing to do with the 2016 MacBook Pro. With Apple’s poor software QA, this theory makes the most sense of all.

MPG has a hunch that the MacBook Pro performance degradation is a GPU driver bug, perhaps one that leaks memory and thus rapidly degrades performance. If so, a fix in a release of macOS is possible, perhaps soon.

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

OWC Introduces Redesigned Mercury Elite Pro Dual with Thunderbolt 2 Technology + SALE on “Gen 1” Version

See the MPG review of the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual 'gen 1'.

Concurrent with the release of the 'gen 2' model,MacSales.com is selling of its stock of the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual at deep discounts.

OWC Introduces Redesigned Mercury Elite Pro Dual with Thunderbolt 2 Technology

Monday, December 5th, 2016

OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual 'gen 2'

OWC today introduced the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual with Thunderbolt® 2 Technology. The new Mercury Elite Pro Dual – designed in Austin, TX by the OWC new product development team – offers speeds up to 474 MB/s, capacities up to 20TB, and RAID modes 0 and 1. A newly engineered aluminum enclosure features a larger, quieter fan and an advanced airflow design for drive health and longevity.

For professionals who need the additional performance of RAID 0 (two disks working together to create one very fast volume), or the peace of mind provided by RAID 1 (two disks mirrored to create instant redundancy), Mercury Elite Pro Dual with Thunderbolt 2 Technology packs serious connectivity in a versatile package.

“The Mercury Elite Pro Dual has long been a go-to solution for creative professionals who need flexibility without sacrificing performance,” said Larry O’Connor, CEO, OWC. “With the addition of Thunderbolt 2 Technology and a new, cooler, quieter design, the Mercury Elite Pro Dual is built to handle demanding workflows, providing peace of mind so you can focus on creating your next masterpiece.”

OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual 'gen 2'

Faster. Quieter. Rugged.

The redesigned Mercury Elite Pro Dual includes a larger, quieter fan and a vented back plane, designed to provide increased airflow and better cooling for the overall health of the unit. The elegant, brushed aluminum enclosure provides rugged protection, designed to withstand demanding environments and persistent travel. Configurable in RAID 0, 1, span, or independent modes via an easy-to-use selector switch, the Mercury Elite Pro Dual is ideal for creative professionals who need fast access to their data with an option for redundancy.

Versatility for Professionals

Two Thunderbolt 2 ports and a USB 3.1 Gen 1 port provide excellent speed and compatibility for connecting to virtually any Mac or PC. The two Thunderbolt 2 ports provide the capability to daisy-chain up to five additional devices including peripherals like additional storage, displays, video devices, and expansion hubs.

Highlights

Redesigned aluminum enclosure for cooler, quieter operation
Thunderbolt 2 and USB 3.1 Gen 1 Connectivity (Read: Up to 474 MB/s; Write: Up to 474 MB/s)
Up to 20TB capacity
Dual-drive hardware RAID 0, 1, span, and independent modes
Daisy-chain up to 6 devices
Includes Thunderbolt and USB cables
Three-year OWC Limited Warranty*
*0GB enclosure-only models feature a one-year OWC Limited Warranty

2016 MacBook Pro: Cannot Sustain Performance Under Load

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

While testing the 2016 MacBook Pro, a consistent pattern of declining performance was observed. For example, with 10 iterations of of the Photoshop sharpening test, the 2016 MacBook Pro declined in performance by 23%. No such decline was seen on the iMac 5K or 2013 Mac Pro.

This differential helps explain why the 2016 MacBook Pro is slower than the 2013 MacBook Pro on the Lightroom import test*.

2016 MacBook Pro: Cannot Sustain Performance

This finding may be of keen interest to anyone processing video or importing into Lightroom or any task that incurs a sustained load.

* Which is not a statement about performance in any other area, particularly GPU-intensive tasks or video processing. Performance is always task specific, not some hard rule. I expect the 2016 MacBook Pro to outperform earlier models for some tasks, including GPU-intensive taskes.

Andrew A writes:

This is a sad sad day of recognition for me. I really wanted to keep on loving Apple, have their phones (7 and 7+) laptops (2011 15” MacBook Pro and a 13” 2015 MacBook Pro), 2013 Mac Pro, their Airport Express (use it with my DAC and HiFi) and Airport Extreme router, and 24” Cinema display plus several iPods. Most of all I used to really loved their software. All since 2003 when I first starting buying their equipment and stock I looked forward to their next innovation and improvement eagerly. Not anymore. Seems like everything need several updates to repair problems newly created.

Now, no more display or router, high priced crappy performance for new machines, everything is soldered and or requires a series of connectors and a dock to use all for the sake of small and light. What happened to useful and reliable??? They may have had a vision of where we should be going (at least with Jobs), but I think their vision has turned to greed and is verymuch shortsighted (cannot see the tree before the forest with each amputation of their product lines).

My 2013 machines may be the last Mac products I ever buy at least for quite a while. Hopefully they will last 10 years (I have a 2006 iMac that still works well; gave it to my daughter with an upgraded SSD). Most of the software I use for my visual and musical entertainment and work should be good enough for my needs for the next 5 years maybe more. Even the iPhone will soon be no different than the rest.

Eventually the only thing they will be selling is the phone at over $1,000 (my current 7+ cost over $800 with the 128GB up from $600+ for the iPhone 6+) and service subscriptions for things that used to be free (TV and music); don’t forget the fee for storing your stuff in the Cloud. Microsoft and Adobe are not too far behind and getting all of us hook on a perpetual fee service.

Perhaps that is where the world is going, everything is rented or leased with a few owning all the capital assets.

Hopefully no Soylent Green in my lifetime, please…

MPG: Apple Core Rot moves to hardware?

Apple should be very glad that Macs are only 5% of their business because I receive emails from former Apple fans who still want to love Apple products, but are tired of being kicked in the groin.

Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

2016 MacBook Pro TESTED: Photoshop Filters

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Following up on the other Photoshop and Lightroom tests, this set of tests offers a detailed look as to how the 2016 MacBook Pro fares with respect to its desktop peers and the 2013 MacBook Pro when there are no memory constraints.

2016 MacBook Pro: Photoshop Filters

2016 MacBook Pro vs other Macs: Photoshop filters
Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

2016 MacBook Pro: Users Report Serious Graphics Glitches, Apple Investigating

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See all 2016 MacBook Pro coverage.

Reader Greg wrote to note the MacRumors report on 2016 MacBook Pro graphics glitches.

MPG has not seen any glitches in testing, but a grueling one hour test is in progress now, using the MemoryTester stress command simultaneously with running 100 iterations of the diglloydMedium benchmark.

Lloyd’s 2016 MacBook Pro goes back Monday. The trusty 2013 MacBook Pro Retina is going to get another year of use, and hopefully late 2017 a MBP with 32GB memory will arrive.

4TB Internal SSD
for 2013 Mac Pro
Free how-to videos and tools included, 3-year warranty

Wiping Personal Data Off a Mac that is Being Returned or Sold

diglloydTools

Richard H writes:

What software/process do you use to wipe all personal data off a Mac that is being returned, if any?

MPG: if booting off another drive and completely destroying everything on the drive is the goal, Disk Utility can do that.

Most of the time, I use my own software (DiglloydTools), specifically the wipeFree command (twice for SSDs assuming 80% or more of the SSD is free) and wipe command in diglloydTools 'dgl'.

Get DiglloydTools.

Thunderbolt 3 Dock
Must-have expansion for 2016 MacBook Pro
Thunderbolt 3 • USB 3 • Gigabit Ethernet • 4K Support • Firewire 800 • Sound Ports

2016 MacBook Pro TESTED: Lightroom Import RAW Files

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

Disappointing on two counts: the 2016 MacBook pro and Adobe’s algorithms.

2016 MacBook Pro: Adobe Lightroom Import RAW Files with 1:1 Previews

Between the minimal or negative improvements with Photoshop and this inferior performance with Lightroom, the 2016 MacBook Pro surely deserves being sent back to its maker.

2016 MacBook Pro: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Import 52 Canon 5DS R 50-megapixel raw files with 1:1 high quality previews
Upgrade Your Mac Memory
At much lower cost than Apple, with more options.
Lloyd recommends 64GB for iMac or Mac Pro for photography/videography.

2016 MacBook Pro: Returning it

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See also 2016 MacBook Pro: Readers Considering 2015 MacBook Pro Instead.

See my Nov 22 post 2016 MacBook Pro: Return It and Stick With 2013 Model? for my reasoning.

I’ve made my decision. The 2016 MacBook Pro is very nice for anyone who does not own a reasonably recent MacBook Pro Retina, but for me (Lloyd) the value proposition is just not there—it is a travel machine only (6 weeks or so a year), and it’s no faster than my 2013 MacBook Pro for what I do. The value proposition is just not there. I’d rather wait a year for a model that has more features, or at least 32GB of memory and/or a faster CPU and GPU.

This is the first and only Mac I’ve purchased with the intent to keep and use and then returned. Which speaks volumes about Apple’s priorities in hardware development. The 2016 MacBook Pro is an excellent machine, superior to the 2013/2014/2015 models in most all way, and were I buying a laptop for the first time or replacing a far older one, I would be delighted. But it just does not offer meaningful value for me vs the 2013 MacBook Pro I already own.

I’ll finish up various tests before it goes away in the FedEx truck on Monday.

Richard H writes:

Especially since the 2016 MBP does not allow RAM or HD upgrade. They are becoming more like iPhones, where a user needs a new model every 1-2 years. I'm sure the Apple business lease program and Apple iPhone Upgrade Program will filter down to non-business MBP lease consumers in 1-2 years.

MPG: seems like a good possibility.

Frank K writes:

Just to let you know that I've returned my full blown MacBookPro 15" 2016 as well. Got random but frequent issues with the track pad (right click commands even when touched the trackpad in the middle or upper left corner, no palm contact involved BTW.)

And graphics issues while using Capture One Pro 10. Every adjustment with the arrow keys result in a short greenish noise pattern on the left quarter of the screen.

Battery live with an external 27" NEC display and Capture One / PS use is down to 4 hours.

My 2011 17" MBP will have to do the job until the next iteration of the current models in fall 2017. Yes, screen is great, graphics performance is more snappy, the fan hardly kicks in but it's just not a big enough upgrade for me - even with a 5 year old model. I do my critical editing work on an external monitor anyway and have upgraded the internal HDDs to SSDs in the last 2 years so as long as the thermal meltdown isn't on the horizon I'll have to stick with what I have.

MPG: I have no hesitation in recommending the 2016 MacBook Pro for a new buyer, assuming it is free of graphics glitches.

Ira W writes:

I'm returning my 2016 MBP as well. I have a Photoshop action that I typically run on all of my images that sets up a variety of curves to add contrast and color and calls a few tools within the Camera Raw Filter.

On my new 2016 MBP it takes *longer* to run than on the 2013 MBP it was supposed to replace. I wound up getting a 2015 refurb instead which runs the action faster -- 17 seconds with the 2015 model where it takes 21-22 seconds with the 2016 model. That's a 25% slowdown! I suspect it's either due to Sierra or (as you've suggested) bad GPU drivers.

I waited for 10.12.2 to come out but it didn't help performance at all. In fact, it may even have made things slightly worse.

MPG: good independent confirmation of the test results in the MPG review of the Apple 2016 MacBook Pro. The 2015 model looks like the one to have for Photoshop users, and the 2015 model also has a fast SSD. But anyone with a 2013/2014/2015 model should just stick with it barring some *specific* known and tested gain with the 2016 model.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

Photoshop + Lightroom for a Year for $88

I see $10 a month for Photoshop and Lightroom as a bargain for any professional.

Today only, Photoshop and Lightroom CC 12 month subscription is only $88.95, which is $7.41 a month. Compared to my cell phone bill, it is less than the tax.

Deal ends at midnight tonight, EST.

...

It neatly solves another nuisance for me: one purchase, vs the monthly $9.99 charge, each of which I have to enter in my accounting program to balance the books. As I have two subscriptions, that’s 24 annoying entries per year. I called Adobe and they refused to allow billing on a year basis.

So now I can pay once, save $31 X 2 = $62 and make only two accounting entries. per year.

Update: gah! There is a limitof one (1) purchase only (I tried!):

Please note: You have exceeded the limit for ADCCPP12MS-Creative Cloud Photography Plan (12 Month Subscription, Download). You currently cannot purchase additional quantity. The item has been removed from you cart

Here’s how it works:

  1. Purchase at B&H Photo. An email like the one below will be sent.
  2. Login to existing Adobe account (if any); cancel current membership.
  3. Logout of Adobe account
  4. Click the redeem link and enter code.

Voila—a year of the plan at reduced cost.

Electronic download info for Adobe Creative Cloud
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

Budget Macs

For the biggest savings, OWC sells used Macs as well as factory sealed Apple refurbished Macs with full 1 year warranty. For example:

B&H Photo has Mac deals and AppleCare deals. Several budget choices below.

Expiring today Nov 30: 30 Apple Deals.

OWC Easy SSD Upgrade Guide
MacBook Pro and MacBook Air
iMac, Mac Pro, MacMini, more!

Reader Comment: DiskTester

Erwin B writes:

Just a short note to thank you for your excellent Disk Tester.

I had two OWC Mercury Electra 3G 1Tb drives go bad on me in the last two months. DiskTester found the problem in no time.

MPG: DiskTester is part of diglloydTools and offers both performance and reliability testing. The test-reliability command is specifically designed to ferret out drive issues, but the other commands are on the lookout for problems while testing as well.

Get diglloydTools and consider subscribing to my photographic publications also.

A few articles about diglloydTools

Aside from testing hard drive or SSD or RAID performance and reliability with DiskTester, data integrity with IntegrityChecker is a must-have workflow tool for anyone with important data:

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

Apple Mail Calendar Spam

UPDATE 12 Dec: Apple has added a “Report Junk” option. This is not a solution to ignoring user preferences (Add invitations to Calendar = Never), but it will help in some ways.

There is a new type of spam making the rounds: spam email containing calendar appointments, which Apple’s software picks up on to annoy me every day.

In effect, Apple provides a spammer’s wet dream toolkit. A spammer counts on some very low response rate, but if spam is never seen it fails the spammer’s goal.

So Apple does the job for the spammer by forcing you to see it: not only is there an in-your-face notification, but it also has to be clicked to gotten rid of—and clicking the wrong button (fairly easy to do) puts spam into Calendar!

Of course if your preferences include auto-adding Calendar appointments from mail, then you've got a serious accumulating mess on your hands—see possible workaround below.

Spam email with calendar appointment, disruption courtesy of Apple
Apple Mail Preferences => General

This macOS behavior above is particularly irksome because I have my mail configured with Add invitations to Calendar = Never. So why is Apple forcing me to respond to junk mail spam to go into my Calendar?

There is also a risk that a mail message with a payload of calendar appointment could be a vector for a virus or trojan if a weakness is found in Mail or Calendar code. Auto-this and auto-that can be very bad for security. If such a weakness is found, tens of millions of users could be compromised in a few hours.

I’ve changed my settings to New message notifications = VIPs, but since the VIP feature has been non-functional for 2 OS releases, in effect I cannot get any notifications at all.

MPG hopes that Apple will issue an OS update that properly respects user preferences.

Unchecking Show invitation messages in Notification Center in Calendar might help (not sure until some time passes):

Apple Calendar app settings => Alerts

Evan A writes about iCloud calendar settings:

Thanks for all your insights over the years, they are extremely helpful in my day-to-day Mac use.

I too have been suffering from the calendar spam issue for the past week, and according to MacWorld today the only way to shut it down is via iCloud calendar online (just another reason to love iCloud).

MPG: Evan A refers to How to disable calendar invite spam on your iPhone, iPad, and Mac. I have not tested or confirmed this solution as I avoid the bug ridden iCloud offerings entirely.

It is not clear that iCloud online is the only solution (or if it works) and since I never use iCloud on the web, it was distasteful to have to go there. Still, I did so and here is the suggested setting:

Apple iCloud Calendar settings => Advanced
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

Cyber Monday Deals

Thank you for using my links. Just click through any link on my site and I get credit for everything that goes into your cart once on that site in that session.

Availability and time frame for special pricing may be limited in some cases—don’t delay.

Callouts

2016 MacBook Pro TESTED: 10-Bit Color With External Display

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

2016 MacBook Pro: 10-Bit Color With External Display

See my reviews of NEC wide gamut displays and other displays.

The built-in MacBook Pro display supports only 8-bit color**.

Attaching the NEC PA244UHD 4K display to the 2016 MacBook Pro confirms that the MacBook Pro drives the display at 60 Hz and 10-bit color*.

Portrait orientation (tall mode) works properly also, as do all the scaled resolution settings, although the default “Best for Display” is the wrong choice (too enlarged).

  • The OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock worked flawlessly with the display being detected immediately. It is on sale now for about $200.
  • The Apple Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt adapter did NOT work to drive the display. Unplugging and replugging and rebooting several times failed to ever detect the display. This is odd, because the same adapter was used to connect the OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock.

So here we see one more hassle with the 2016 MacBook Pro: the Apple adapter does not function! However, since the OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock (and future OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock) offers many ports of several kinds, the smart move is to get both and use the Thunderbolt/MiniDisplayPort port on the Dock for the display, and the Apple adapter for any kind of external device other than a display.

* “30-Bit Color” means the 3 RGB channels at 10 bits each.
** “32-Bit Color” means 3 RGB channels plus alpha channel at 8 bits each.

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

OWC 40TB SSD: RAID-4 vs RAID-5 from 32KiB to 512MiB Transfers

The Thunderbay 4 Mini RAID-5 edition is available with SSDs in capacities from 1TB to 40TB. MPG strong recommends the RAID edition.

Thunderbay 4 Mini configurations (non RAID) are also available, as well as hard drive configurations are also available.

Added to my review of the OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD is additional analysis of RAID-4 vs RAID-5 with the OWC 40TB SSD.

OWC 40TB SSD: RAID-4 vs RAID-5

As shown below, RAID-4 mode is the unequivocal winner over RAID-5 for read performance (blue vs green lines).

disktester run-sequential-suite -s 32 -3 512M --iterations 5 --test-size 4G

Figures are in MiB/sec. Multiply by 1.048576 for MB/sec.

 
Sustained transfer performance with a 30TB RAID-4 vs RAID-5 SSD configuration in OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

Black Friday Specials, Links (updated @ 16:50 PST Nov 26)

See also all my B&H Photo wish lists.

Thank you for using my links.

Just click through any link on my site and I get credit for everything that goes into your cart once on that site in that session.

Prices and availability may be limited to hours in some cases — don’t delay.

OWC computer deals

See a long list of OWC Black Friday specials as well as callouts below.

OWC says “These deals are moving, many won’t make it till Monday + some already gone. Check ˜em out!”.

Apple and computer deals:

Callouts:

 

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

OWC 40TB SSD Sequential Transfer Speed: RAID-4 beats RAID-5 by 16% for Reads

The Thunderbay 4 Mini RAID-5 edition is available with SSDs in capacities from 1TB to 40TB. MPG strong recommends the RAID edition.

Thunderbay 4 Mini configurations (non RAID) are also available, as well as hard drive configurations are also available.

Added to my review of the OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD is analysis of RAID-4 vs RAID-5 with the OWC 40TB SSD.

OWC 40TB SSD: RAID-4 vs RAID-5

RAID-4 mode is 16% faster for reads, and it also touches the estimated asymptote for theoretical best performance (based on testing the SSDs singly).

The supplied SoftRAID deserves kudos for implementing RAID with performance that sets a benchmark; few if any hardware solutions can do this well.

Figures are in MiB/sec. Multiply by 1.048576 for MB/sec.

 
Sustained transfer performance with a 30TB RAID-4 vs RAID-5 SSD configuration in OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini
Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

2016 MacBook Pro: Strange Rainbow Beachball Behaviors

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Never observed with the 2013 MacBook Pro, and both wired with gigabit ethernet—

The 2016 MacBook Pro regularly does a rainbow beachball for a second or two, then all is well. It seems to happen if the machine has been idle for a bit, but not gone to sleep. In three years I (Lloyd) have not observed anything like this behavior with the 2013 MacBook Pro.

The cause is unclear: could it be related to some kind of new power management algorithms? It’s minor but annoying, along with the chimeless black screen guessing game at system boot. These two behaviors constitute annoyance only, but they are surprisingly irritating compared to the rock solid predictable behavior of the 2013 MacBook Pro.

2016 MacBook Pro: Readers Considering 2015 MacBook Pro Instead

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

James A writes:

I am thinking about buying the Mid 2015 15inch MBP, 1TB, 16gb. I’ll get the ports, display and not give away too much performance. Am I missing something or does this seem like a reasonable move for my photography?

MPG: if one already has a 2013 or 2014 MacBook Pro, then the 2016 model runs the gamut from compelling to a headache; it all depends on how one uses it: desktop or travel, type of work done with it, size of jobs (e.g., memory limits), etc. Even something as simple as external power could be a compelling feature for some users.

The internal SSD of the 2013/2014/2015 MacBook Pro SSD can be upgraded to 1TB.

In general, the MPG recommendation is that anyone with a 2013/2014/2015 MacBook Pro should skip the 2016 offering unless there is some compelling feature (such as external battery power). For example, that a video crew or pro photographer shooting offsite (or even onsite) would find external battery power via USB-C a compelling feature both for runtime and for avoiding trip-over risk of wall cords.

The other reason to upgrade is that the expense matters not, but that is not my situation. The top-end model whose price with AppleCare and tax approaches $5K would be much more palatable, for, say $3200 (Apple has not added any value with the 2016 model in terms of core specs vs price). I’d still be slightly grumpy about the performance sidegrade, but accept the price and make use of the new features like the external battery power—I travel a lot in the mountains and runtime is a hassle on the 2013 model.

See also:

Discounts

OWC and B&H Photo both have discounts on 2015 models. MPG strongly recommends models with the 1TB SSD (and of course 16GB of memory).

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

TESTED: OWC 40TB SSD Sequential Transfer Speed

The Thunderbay 4 Mini RAID-5 edition is available with SSDs in capacities from 1TB to 40TB. MPG strong recommends the RAID edition.

Thunderbay 4 Mini configurations (non RAID) are also available, as well as hard drive configurations are also available.

Added to my review of the OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD is performance on sequential transferes from 32 KiB to 512 MiB with a RAID-0 stripe.

OWC 40TB SSD: RAID-0 Transfer Size Performance

Figures are in MiB/sec. Multiply by 1.048576 for MB/sec.

 
SoftRAID showing a 40TB RAID-0 stripe SSD in OWC Thunderbay 4 MIni
Cycling

TESTED: OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD with RAID-0 Stripe and RAID-4 Fault Tolerance

GetOWC Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD RAID Edition at MacSales.com.

Following up on yesterday’s overview of OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD, below are performance results with both RAID-0 striping and RAID-5 fault tolerance.

RAID-0 striping

This is the best performance MPG has ever seen with Thunderbolt 2 (or from any external SSD). It sets the new benchmark.

  • Read performance flatlines at 1425 MB/sec
  • Write performance flatlines at 1192 MB/sec
 
30TB RAID-5 SSD: OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini

Those are average figures across across a gigantic 39.37TB volume! Context: those figures beat the internal 1TB SSD in the MPG 2013 Mac Pro. It looks like Thunderbolt 2 has throttled the read performance. MPG expects OWC to offer a similar solution with Thunderbolt 3 in 2017, in which case the read speeds should rise to even higher levels.

RAID-4 (fault tolerance)

This is the best performance MPG has ever seen with Thunderbolt 2 (or from any external SSD). It sets the new benchmark.

  • RAID-4 Read performance flatlines at 1224 MB/sec
  • RAID-4 Write performance flatlines at 853 MB/sec

The RAID-4 performance is outstanding in two ways:

  • Flat line consistency across the entire 29.8TB volume.
  • Data rates within a few percent of the theoretical speed, that is, 75% of the speed of RAID-0.

It’s a superlative performance from four SSDs in the Thunderbay 4 Mini witih SoftRAID.

Tested using disktester fill-volume --xfer 128M with diglloydTools disktester

Graph shows writes read filling the volume to 99% capacity with 1000 test files.

RAID-0: Write @ 1137 MiB/sec = 1192 MB/sec, Read @ 1359 MiB/sec = 1425 MB/sec
RAID-4: Write @  814 MiB/sec =  853 MB/sec, Read @ 1167 MiB/sec = 1224 MB/sec
RAID-5: Write @  814 MiB/sec =  854 MB/sec, Read @ 1003 MiB/sec = 1052 MB/sec

 
Sustained transfer performance with a 40TB RAID-0 stripe vs 30TB RAID-4 SSD configuration in OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini
Cycling

TESTED: OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD

GetOWC Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD RAID Edition at MacSales.com.

 
40TB SSD: OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini

Following up on yesterday’s overview of OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD, here is performance.

This is the best performance MPG has ever seen with Thunderbolt 2 (or from any external SSD). It sets the new benchmark.

  • Read performance flatlines at 1425 MB/sec
  • Write performance flatlines at 1192 MB/sec

Those are average figures across across a gigantic 39.37TB volume! Context: those figures beat the internal 1TB SSD in the MPG 2013 Mac Pro.

There looks to be cruising room here for 4K raw video capture. Or any hyper demanding task for writes and even better for reads.

It looks like Thunderbolt 2 has throttled the read performance. MPG expects OWC to offer a similar solution with Thunderbolt 3 in 2017, in which case the read speeds should rise to even higher levels.

Tested using disktester fill-volume --xfer 128M with diglloydTools disktester

Write @ 1137 MiB/sec = 1192 MB/sec, Read @ 1359 MiB/sec = 1425 MB/sec
Test size 37.0 GiB = 39.37 GB in 1000 37.0 GiB files

 
SoftRAID showing a 40TB RAID-0 stripe SSD in OWC Thunderbay 4 MIni

A wide range of capacities is available. Capacity rating reflects usage as RAID-0 stripe or single drives. Using in RAID-5 mode means that 1/4 of the capacity used for parity, e.g., reducing 40TB to 30TB usable capacity.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD

Get OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini and OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini RAID Edition at MacSales.com.

 
40TB SSD: OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini

Here it is folks: an about $28000 40TB SSD, consisting of four 10TB Sage Electronics 2.5-inch “Black Edition” SSDs in the four bays of the OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini (RAID Edition).

Who needs 40TB of SSD storage (30TB as RAID-5)? Any professional outfit shooting 4K or 6K or 8K video for starters. Huge databases, huge collections of photos or sound and so on. Anything where high bandwidth and huge capacity are needed. An ultra-fast backup device for another similar capacity unit and/or many other devices.

On top of the huge capacity and extreme peformance (about 1200 MB/sec across the 40TB capacity), the OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini is tiny for the capacity it offers. It can easily fit into small bag, perhaps even into a briefcase. That makes it an incredibly powerful tool for any video professional or similar requiring huge capacity while on shoots. Or airline travel where bulk and weight count.

The next closest thing would be the 40TB OWC Thunderbay 4 RAID Edition, which is quite a bit bulkier and heavier. But at about $2997 it offers as much capacity in a hard drive format at about 1/9 the cost (and lower performance that is variable as the capacity fills, as all hard drives solutions do).

Below, the four SSDs are setup as a 40TB RAID-0 stripe.

As shown, the screen shot from SoftRAID is inverted intentionally, as an attention getter.

 
SoftRAID showing a 40TB RAID-0 stripe SSD in OWC Thunderbay 4 MIni

Testing

A long-running test is now in progress with the fill-volume command of diglloydTools DiskTester. More tests will follow after that completes.

diglloydIMAC:diglloydUtil lloyd$ disktester fill-volume OWC_40TB
DiskTester 2.2.14 64-bit, diglloydTools 2.2.14, 2016-08-04 14:00
Copyright 2006-2016 DIGLLOYD INC. All Rights Reserved
Use of this software requires a license. See http://macperformanceguide.com/Software-License.html

OS X 10.12.1, 8 CPU cores, 65536MiB memory 2016-11-23 at 15:16:33973

Volume: OWC_40TB Num files: 1000 Space to fill: 36.2 TiB File size: 37.0 GiB Transfer size: 131072 KiB Fill with: "0x0000000000000000" Free space to remain: 223.6 GiB = 0.60%

Creating up to 1000 files of size 37.0 GiB on volume "OWC_40TB" Speed shown includes file system create/open/allocate/write-- real world time.

Elapsed File# Qty 2sec 5sec 15sec 1min 2min 5min 15min 30min 60min 2s:15s 1m:5m ClockAvg 5s 0 5.62 GiB 1105 1143 1143 1143 1143 1143 1143 1143 1143 0.97 1.00 1130 ... Elapsed File# Qty 2sec 5sec 15sec 1min 2min 5min 15min 30min 60min 2s:15s 1m:5m ClockAvg 19522s 585 21.2 TiB 1124 1133 1140 1139 1141 1141 1140 1140 1141 0.99 1.00 1137 19527s 585 21.2 TiB 1147 1143 1142 1139 1141 1141 1141 1140 1141 1.00 1.00 1137 19532s 585 21.2 TiB 1149 1140 1139 1139 1141 1141 1141 1140 1141 1.01 1.00 1137 19537s 585 21.2 TiB 1131 1133 1139 1140 1140 1141 1141 1140 1141 0.99 1.00 1137 19542s 585 21.2 TiB 1142 1139 1139 1139 1140 1141 1141 1140 1141 1.00 1.00 1137 19547s 585 21.2 TiB 1139 1142 1138 1139 1140 1141 1141 1140 1141 1.00 1.01 1137 19552s 585 21.2 TiB 1164 1145 1140 1139 1140 1141 1141 1140 1141 1.02 1.01 1137 19557s 586 21.2 TiB 1124 1135 1138 1138 1139 1141 1141 1140 1141 0.99 1.01 1137 19562s 586 21.2 TiB 1163 1138 1138 1139 1139 1141 1141 1140 1141 1.02 1.01 1137 19567s 586 21.2 TiB 1125 1138 1136 1139 1139 1140 1141 1140 1141 0.99 1.01 1137 19572s 586 21.2 TiB 1126 1139 1140 1140 1139 1141 1141 1140 1141 0.99 1.01 1137 19577s 586 21.2 TiB 1137 1149 1143 1140 1139 1141 1141 1140 1141 0.99 1.01 1137 19582s 586 21.2 TiB 1120 1134 1141 1140 1139 1140 1141 1140 1141 0.98 1.01 1137 19588s 587 21.2 TiB 1134 1143 1142 1140 1139 1140 1141 1140 1141 0.99 1.02 1137 ...
 
SoftRAID showing a 40TB RAID-0 stripe SSD in OWC Thunderbay 4 MIni
Upgrade Your Mac Memory
At much lower cost than Apple, with more options.
Lloyd recommends 64GB for iMac or Mac Pro for photography/videography.

OWC Black Friday Specials

OWC says:

  • Shipping is free on most everything $49 and up and can ship up to 8PM at night, shipping Friday, Shipping Saturdays too. We’re there for those last minute ‘rush’ orders when you need us! International Delivery Specials from $2.99.
  • Special Purolator Courier to Canada only $9.95 on $99 & up + FREE on orders $500 & up

Featured Black Friday Deals now up on this page.

The full list found here.

We have boatloads of deals up now… and more will be going live after 6PM as well. But these are a large segment.

Product highlights - things already going fast:

**Bonus Round**

=====


Thunderbolt 3 Dock
Must-have expansion for 2016 MacBook Pro
Thunderbolt 3 • USB 3 • Gigabit Ethernet • 4K Support • Firewire 800 • Sound Ports

B&H Photo Black Friday Deals Start Tonight at 21:01 Pacific Time (12:01 Eastern)

See my wish lists at B&H Photo.

Please use this link, which is active now, but will have Black Friday prices as noted above:

B&H Photo Black Friday Deals
(prices start at 21:01 Pacific time)

All APPLE deals.

Pre Black Friday deals (available right now):

OWC 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD

Get OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini and OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini RAID Edition at MacSales.com.

This graphic depicts the relative capacities of a 1TB SSD versus the OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini 40TB SSD. MPG will be testing this 40TB monster starting today. Wow!

The 40TB OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini is available for sale right now with capacities from 1TB to 40TB SSD ($27999) or 2TB to 8TB hard drives.

 
Circles whose areas represent 1TB and 40TB
 
OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini SSD pricing
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

2016 MacBook Pro TESTED: Photoshop Performance on Real World Job 'Create Size Variants'

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

Yesterday, the diglloyd Photoshop benchmarks showed the 2016 MacBook Pro to be slower than the 2013 MacBook Pro—yikes!

Today another Photoshop test, and one that Lloyd does day in and day out for generating lens rendering aperture series shows a smidgen better performance for the 2016 MacBook Pro, effectively no gain at all. This test is as real world as it gets, at least for Lloyd’s photographic work. This particular job was one performed only a few days prior for this lens comparison, repeated here on all four test machines.

2016 MacBook Pro: Photoshop Create Size Variants

Here, the 2016 MacBook Pro ekes out a 2.7% win over the 2013 MacBook Pro. But in one run it turned in a slower time, and its performance is oddly variable in all the tests, suggesting some kind of power management behavior that degrades performance at times.

Photoshop CC 2017: 21 x 36-megapixel layers in 6.1GB file: resize, sharpen, convert profile, save as JPEG 12 size variants
SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

2016 MacBook Pro: Return It and Stick With 2013 Model?

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See also 2016 MacBook Pro: Readers Considering 2015 MacBook Pro Instead.

As the MPG Photoshop tests show, the fastest possible build of the 2016 MacBook Pro is slower than the 2013 MacBook Pro. Three years for a... downgrade. Of course the SSD is faster and the screen has a wider gamut, but the whole thing is a mixed bag with no obvious “win” when the pros and cons are added up. Surely it’s a net win if buying a MacBook Pro the first time, or against a much older model, but versus the 2013/2014/2015 models, the question is of value (cost vs benefit).

A fully loaded 2016 MacBook Pro exceeds $5000 with taxes and AppleCare and adapters. That’s a pile of dough, so I am seriously doubting that a top-flight 2016 MacBook Pro makes any sense at all at this point. Less functionality for my primary usage (field use for photography), at huge cost.

My original premise was that (a) I needed Thunderbolt 3 for testing (still true but I can borrow for now), and (b) that there would be real world gains for my Photoshop work. I expected something, say a 10% to 15% reduction in processing time. Not a 7% performance loss.

My 2013 MacBook Pro Retina still performs like a champ and has none of the port hassles. Why should I drop $5K on a machine that underperforms or at best (for my work) is no faster?

If after a new MacBook Pro, a discounted 2015 MacBook Pro at B&H or discounted MacBook Pro at OWC may be better options for some, though they are selling out fast and are not likely to last long—buyers are voting with their wallets. Excepting the SSD, the 2015 model will be just as fast and with none of the port hassles.

As for Thunderbolt 3 ports, a revised Mac Pro with Thunderbolt 3 or at least an iMac 5K with Thunderbolt 3 ought to come along with 3-4 months. I’d rather spend my money on either of those than on a laptop no faster than my 3-year-old model. Also, the 16GB memory limit makes the MacBook Pro a non-starter for much of the work I now relegate to my 2013 Mac Pro, which keeps the MacBook Pro from serving any useful function as an alternative desktop workstation (for me at least).

Update 01 December: I’ve made my decision. The 2016 MacBook faux Pro is very nice for anyone who does not own a reasonably recent MacBook Pro Retina, but for me (Lloyd) the value proposition is just not there—it is a travel machine only (6 weeks or so a year), and it’s no faster than my 2013 MacBook Pro Retina for what I do. The value proposition is just not there. I’d rather wait a year for a model that has more features, or at least 32GB of memory and/or a faster CPU and GPU.

Apple Abandons Wireless Routers (no more Apple Airport)

From bloomberg.com: Apple Abandons Development of Wireless Routers:

Apple Inc. has disbanded its division that develops wireless routers, another move to try to sharpen the company’s focus on consumer products that generate the bulk of its revenue, according to people familiar with the matter.

Apple began shutting down the wireless router team over the past year, dispersing engineers to other product development groups, including the one handling the Apple TV, said the people, who asked not to be named because the decision hasn’t been publicly announced.

...

Apple currently sells three wireless routers, the AirPort Express, AirPort Extreme, and AirPort Time capsule. The Time capsule doubles as a backup storage hard drive for Mac computers.

...

What does this say about the potential for other low volume products, like the Mac Pro?

2016 MacBook Pro TESTED: Photoshop Performance

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

The 2016 MacBook Pro does not have the chops for larger Photoshop tasks. Moreover the performance of the fastest-possible 2016 MacBook Pro is scarcely faster than the 2013 model for in-memory work. This 2016 MacBook Pro is not an upgrade in terms of getting work done in Photoshop. It is a 'dud' upgrade. You are buying Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C ports (and incompatibility), a faster SSD and nicer screen.

See the three different tests:

2016 MacBook Pro: diglloyd Photoshop Benchmarks

There is no meaningful argument in favor of upgrading for a Photoshop user, excepting really large editing jobs in Photoshop, in which case the faster SSD of the 2016 MacBook Pro helps a great deal. But anyone doing that on a regular basis should be using a Mac Pro or iMac 5K.

...

I am seriously doubting that spending close to $4800 (with AppleCare and tax) on a top-flight 2016 MacBook Pro makes any sense at all. My original premise was that (a) I needed Thunderbolt 3 for testing (still true), and (b) that there would be real world gains for the things I do in Photoshop. The latter premise is proven false, making me seriously consider returning the 2016 MacBook Pro and sticking with my 2013 MacBook Pro Retina, which still performs like a champ and has none of the port hassles. Plus perhaps a revised Mac Pro or iMac 5K will come along in 3-4 months, with Thunderbolt 3. I’d rather spend my money there than so much on a laptop which will perform the same as my 3-year-old one.

If you want a new MacBook Pro, you may be better off with a discounted 2015 MacBook Pro at B&H or discounted MacBook Pro at OWC, though they are selling out fast and are not likely to last long—buyers are voting with their wallets. Excepting the SSD, the 2015 model will be just as fast and with none of the port hassles.

diglloydSpeed1 Photoshop benchmark for 2016 MacBook Pro vs others
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

2016 MacBook Pro: the SanDisk USB-C Card Reader Does not Work with my Lexar SDXC Cards

SanDisk USB-C card reader

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

The SanDisk Extreme Pro SD UHS-II Card USB-C Reader sold by Apple* does not work with my Lexar 256GB SDXC cards.

My Lexar 256GB cards have worked in every one of the six other card readers I have used over the past year—never a problem.

So much for a USB-C solution.

The SanDisk USB-C reader is badly designed anyway; it sticks far out of the machine so in crampled quarters there is no room to insert it. Also, the card is difficult to remove because of the projecting lip on it. One has to pinch the card to try to extract it, very hard to do with cold fingers.

The good news is that my other card readers work fine via a USB-C to USB-A adapter or via the OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock, etc.

One positive that compensates in part for having to carry a separate card reader and adapter versus built-in: the Lexar card reader I use with the USB-C to USB-A adapter copies from the card about 3X faster than the built-in SD slot of the 2013 MacBook Pro.

* The necessity for which is rationalized away by an Apple executive ignorant or willfully in denial of reality.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

2016 MacBook Pro: USB-C Might Offer Massive Runtime via External Batteries

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Battery Menu 2016 MacBook Pro w/
Anker PowerCore+ 20100 battery

Update 21 November: Anker has responded to my email inquiry, stating:

I am sorry that the PowerCore+ 20100 is unable to charge 2016 MacBook Pro (15" model) as it is not powerful enough to activate this laptop. We have another external battery which can charge the new Macbook [sic]. Below is the link of this battery:

I’m not clear given the response which says “can charge the MacBook” that this battery will charge the MacBook Pro, but it looks like it ought to, delivering 30 watts.

Anker won’t exchange the batteries but did offer a 10% credit. The thing is, I bought these Aug 1 thinking they would charge a MacBook Pro, which I knew was coming (I used them for solar testing also). Now I have two PowerCore+ 21000 batteries that won’t do the job. I requested an exchange, but I got the “past 30 days” response.

Update 25 November: after much back and forth, Anker has agreed to send me one Anker PowerCore Speed 20000 PD 20000 mAH battery, which is claimed to provide 30 watts of charging power. However, it is out of stock and might not arrive for weeks, and by then I may have sent the 2016 MacBook Pro back.

...

A few weeks ago, I discussed the appeal of external battery power for the 2016 MacBook Pro via USB-C, in particular the Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C battery.

External batteries with USB-C still hold promise for providing a total of up to 30 hours of runtime with just two of the Anker batteries I discuss, in theory being able to provide 12 watts (2.4A X 5V), which is enough for steady state usage, albeit not enough for demanding usage—but 12 watts should still defer internal battery drain.

However, I am disappointed to report that the Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C battery fails to supply charging power to the 2016 MacBook Pro 15" model, even though the MBP shows a lightning icon (as if charging), chimes when the power is connected (as if a power adapter were working), and indicates that Power Source: Power Adapter in the charging menu.

Or, perhaps it is the MacBook Pro disliking not being able to pull more than 12 watts. Or, outside chance, the Apple USB-C cable is involved.

  1. Press the button on the Anker PowerCore to put it into the mode of supplying power (so it won’t try to charge itself instead).
  2. Connect the Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C battery to the MacBook Pro via the Apple USB-C cable (unplug one end from the Apple wall wart and plug into the Anker battery).
  3. Observe that the MacBook Pro is happy as a clam, showing “Power Source: Power Adapter”.

I have sent an email inquiry to Anker tech support.

Shown below with some green Gaffer’s tape on it, the about $60 Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C is a compact 74 watt-hour battery that weighs only 467 grams (517g with soft case and two USB cables)—about one pound. I have used it in the field when backpacking to recharge Sony A7R II batteries as well as a Fenix flashlight. It can also be solar charged.

Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C battery connected via USB-C to a 2016 MacBook Pro

 

 
Upgrade Your Mac Memory
At much lower cost than Apple, with more options.
Lloyd recommends 64GB for iMac or Mac Pro for photography/videography.

2016 MacBook Pro: Configuring the Touchbar Control Strip

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Some aspects of the touchbar are good, and some drive me crazy.

Go to System Preferences => Keyboard => Customize Control Strip.

This customization dialog seemed inoperable on macOS 10.12.1 on my 2016 MacBook Pro; dragging things seemingly had no effect: I am not used to dragging off the screen.

Finally it hit me: one has to drag the icons down towards the touchbar, off the screen (just as the instructions say, doh!); doing so makes the dragged item light up on the touchbar. Something new and for me at least, 10 minutes of confusion.

Similarly, to remove an item from the touchbar, move the pointer below the screen; an item on the touchbar itself will light up—drag that item up and out of the touchbar.

See also Configuring the Touchbar Control Strip to Show All Function Keys and 2016 MacBook Pro touchbar control strip articles.

What is frustrating here is that I need at most one or two of these icons (I use command key shortcuts by preference), and the ones I do want are missing (function keys) and app-specific items.

Tip: configured however wayt, holding down the fn key at bottom left of keyboard toggles the touchbar display to a set of alternate items.

System Preferences => Keyboard => Customize Control Strip
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

2016 MacBook Pro: Configuring the Touchbar Control Strip to Show All Function Keys

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

The touchbar control strip can also be configured for individual items; see Configuring the Touchbar Control Strip.

System Preferences => Keyboard => Customize Control Strip

To force the touchbar control strip to display all 12 function keys, drag the desired app(s) into the window as shown.

Doing so restores the keyboard to a traditional layout for those app(s), using virtual keys on the touchbar, as shown further below.

System Preferences => Keyboard => Customize Control Strip

Below, the 2016 MacBook Pro touchbar control strip now shows only function keys.

To access other items, hold down the fn key at bottom left of keyboard; this toggles the touchbar display to a set of alternate items. And vice versa if the function keys are not the defaults.

See also see Apple’s Using function keys on MacBook Pro with Touch Bar.

2016 MacBook Pro touchbar control strip configured to show only function keys:

2016 MacBook Pro: Siri Icon on the Touchbar is Driving me Crazy

See 2016 MacBook Pro touchbar control strip articles.

Update: here is how to remove the Siri icon.

I would destructively REMOVE Apple’s Siri if there were a safe way to do so.

This Siri dialog (further below) is driving me crazy.

Flat keys next to crapware icon make easy miss

I have Siri turned off but I use Terminal a lot , and in Terminal (and many other apps), Apple has placed a Siri icon in the touchbar, right above the Delete key. That’s right: Siri is explicitly off, but Apple places the Siri button there anyway. Qué siri siri I guess.

I use the Delete key a lot, since I make a lot of typing mistakes. The keyboard in the 2016 Macbook Pro has nearly flat keys (like the MacBook). They are certainly usable but have poor tactile feedback as compared to a real keyboard and fingers can wander more easily.

The main thing is that with flat keys, it is easy to hit that dwimmerlaik Siri button just above the Delete key, thus provoking the “for the 200th time, do you want to enable Siri ” crapware dialog. No, not this time, nor the 199th time, nor ever. I turned Siri off and I want it off—forever. Begone. Gah!

So I regularly press that Siri icon by accident. I have had to respond to this dialog at least 20 times in just two hours or so. It took me a while to figure out why this dialog kept appearing, making it all the more maddening until I realized the cause.

... the Touch Bar at the top of your keyboard adapts to what you're doing and gives you intuitive shortcuts and app controls when you need them.

And when not wanted or needed, and there’s nothing intuitive about no power key.

I have Siri turned off. I don’t ever want it turned on. Why does Apple push crapware on users like this in a key working location? Software developers respectful of their users take the time to add a “don’t bother me again checkbox”—some apps do this (like Photoshop) and it is much appreciated.

2TB SSD in 2016 MacBook Pro (and a bug in categorizing the data)

Martin D writes:

You should be able to customize the touch bar to remove the Siri button. You may have to do this on an app-by-app basis. Another thing you can do is set the touch bar to show function keys by default for one or more apps (that’s in settings)

MPG: I know I ought to be able to do so. To have to customize-out something due to software harassment is poor design judgment: would not it make sense if a user explicitly disables Siri to not show the Siri icon?

There exists nothing in Terminal preferences to control the control strip, but customization is possible, sort of half-baked stuff.

4TB Internal SSD
for 2013 Mac Pro
Free how-to videos and tools included, 3-year warranty

2016 MacBook Pro: Why I Went With the 2TB SSD

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See also Saving up to 8.5GB of Space After Every Apple Xcode Update.

With a 512GB SSD in my 2013 MacBook Pro, I only had about 180GB of free space available, which regularly overflowed on my photographic outings (I shoot raw only, not JPEG).

When I purchased the 2013 MacBook Pro, I was pretty sure that 512GB would be enough, but 18 months later that assumption proved wrong.

So this go-round, I considered buying the 2016 MacBook Pro with a 1TB SSD, which will be enough for... how long? And the SSD in the 2016 MBP cannot be replaced, being soldered onto the logic board.

Then there is the issue of longevity: a 2TB SSD used to significantly less than its capacity (say 1.5T or less) has in effect has far more “over provisioning”, so that when blocks of flash fail as they inevitably do, there are ample unused blocks around. Compare filling a 1TB SSD with 950GB of data versus filling a 2TB SSD with that same 950GB; there is no “wiggle room” on the 1TB SSD in either storage capacity, or in unused blocks to deal with flash block failure.

Thus my decision to go with a 2TB SSD. Now I have ample space to take along whatever I need, as well as ample storage for my 7-14 day shoots.

2TB SSD in 2016 MacBook Pro (and a bug in categorizing the data)

Apple iPhone Secretly Uploading Call Logs when iCloud is Enabled?

Where is Tim Cook’s voice on such matters? He seems to have time to express his views in other ways about non-business matters, so how about discussing this privacy issue openly and honestly? Deny it or acknowledge it, but speak up Tim.

According to IPHONES SECRETLY SEND CALL HISTORY TO APPLE, SECURITY FIRM SAYS at TheIntercept.com:

Russian digital forensics firm Elcomsoft has found that Apple’s mobile devices automatically send a user’s call history to the company’s servers if iCloud is enabled — but the data gets uploaded in many instances without user choice or notification.

“You only need to have iCloud itself enabled” for the data to be sent, said Vladimir Katalov, CEO of Elcomsoft.

The logs surreptitiously uploaded to Apple contain a list of all calls made and received on an iOS device, complete with phone numbers, dates and times, and duration. They also include missed and bypassed calls. Elcomsoft said Apple retains the data in a user’s iCloud account for up to four months, providing a boon to law enforcement who may not be able to obtain the data either from the user’s phone, if it’s encrypted with an unbreakable passcode, or from the carrier. Although large carriers in the U.S. retain call logs for a year or more, this may not be the case with carrier outside the US.

It’s not just regular call logs that get sent to Apple’s servers. FaceTime, which is used to make audio and video calls on iOS devices, also syncs call history to iCloud automatically, according to Elcomsoft. The company believes syncing of both regular calls and FaceTime call logs goes back to at least iOS 8.2, which Apple released in March 2015.

MPG despises iCloud not for such things (reason enough), but for its severe design problems and bugs, free to enjoy for anyone with more than one computer or iPhone.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

2016 MacBook Pro: Disappointing 8-Bit Video on Built-In Display

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

With a DCI-P3 display gamut, I am surprised and disappointed that even the high-end GPU in the 2016 MacBook Pro supports only 8-bit video.

With a wide gamut display, 10 bits is important to rendering subtle gradients seamlessly. Looks like we have to wait another generation for proper video support. Still, the alleged DCI P3 gamut is a big plus—that to be checked on soon.

MPG has not yet checked whether the 2016 MacBook Pro can deliver 10 bit color to external displays. It seemed unlikely given the half-hearted 8-bit video on the built-in screen, but Apple specs say it is so:

Simultaneously supports full native resolution on built-in display at millions of colors and:

One display with 5120-by-2880 resolution at 60Hz at over a billion colors
Up to two displays with 4096-by-2304 resolution at 60Hz at over a billion colors
Thunderbolt 3 digital video output

Native DisplayPort output over USB‑C
VGA, HDMI, and Thunderbolt 2 output supported using adapters (sold separately)

This is particularly disappointing having paid for the fastest GPU.

2016 MacBook Pro does NOT support 10 bit video, even with most expensive GPU option!

2016 MacBook Pro: the Downsides to a Soldered-on SSD

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

While the SSD in the 2016 MacBook Pro has jaw dropping performance, there are serious downsides as discussed in depth at MacSales.com. One excerpt:

Drive Failure

With the drive physically on the motherboard, if it should fail and you’re beyond the warranty/AppleCare period, any repair would likely cost as much as a new machine, or be very, very expensive. If a drive were to fail on the second year of usage, telling the customer they need to buy a new computer would leave a bad taste in anyone’s mouth – especially if that computer was a $3,000 15-inch MacBook Pro.

Most interesting is this: if the SSD fails, the entire computer is 'toast', you’d have to buy an entirely new computer, unless Apple comes up with some kind or special repair program.

Well, that’s not 100% entirely correct: if the SSD failed but did not otherwise derange the MacBook Pro, the machine could still be booted and used off an external SSD. Not much joy there, but it would work.

Ditto for the CPU, GPU and memory too (which are also soldered-on), but traditionally nearly all computers have drives have been replaceable, and drives have been a key failure point. Hopefully the SSD in the MacBook Pro is highly durable. Still, it is a very disturbing thought that a $4400 laptop could be unrepairable if *any* of {CPU, GPU, memory, SSD} fail — all are soldered on.

Accordingly, it is foolish to not buy AppleCare on the 2016 MacBook Pro. BTW, if these Apple laptops are so terrific, why the miserly 1-year warranty? A 1-year warranty speaks volumes about the quality of a product*. BTW, B&H Photo has discounted AppleCare.

* A product is the sum of the hardware and software and service and support and warranty.

2016 MacBook Pro: Jaw-Dropping SSD Performance

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Jaw dropping performance.

The graph was blank at first—the figures were off the scale of all previous Macs! Insane.

More...

The OWC teardown of the touchbar 2016 MacBook Pro shows a soldered-on SSD. If this is the price to pay for performance, so be it. Be sure to order 2016 MacBook Pro with 1TB or 2TB SSD. Smaller options are likely to become cramped.

Tested with the fill-volume command of diglloydTools DiskTester. The MacBook Pro was booted via external drive, then the 2TB internal SSD was erased before testing.

Performance of 2TB SSD/Flash drive in 2016 MacBook Pro, large sustained transfers over entire 2TB capacity
disktester fill-volume

2016 MacBook Pro: System Integrity Protection (SIP) Disabled as Shipped by Apple

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

In a troubling slip-up, Apple has shipped at least some 2016 MacBook Pros with System Integrity Protection (SIP) disabled, which exposes the MBP to malware and other threats.

The MPG MacBook Pro shipped with SIP disabled:

MacBook-Pro:~ lloyd$ sudo csrutil status
Password:
System Integrity Protection status: disabled.

√ MPG tested and verified this fix as follows

The fix is to boot into recovery mode (cmd-R at startup), then do 'csrutil enable'.

As shown below, the MacBook Pro was booted into recovery mode, then Utilities => Terminal was chosen. See the 'csrutil enable' command near bottom.

Rebooting, SIP is confirmed enabled:

MacBook-Pro:~ lloyd$ sudo csrutil status
Password:
System Integrity Protection status: enabled.
Using csrutil to enable System Integrity Protection (SIP)
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

2016 MacBook Pro: Enabling the Startup Chime... does not work

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Apple removed the startup chime by default for the 2016 MacBook Pro, but it can be restored. Thanks to reader Jewels Davies for passing along this nvram fix.

UPDATE: I tried the solution below immediately after writing this post... the wrong order of course, but the machine was running a test at the time and could not be interrupted. This solution just does not work on my MacBook Pro. The volume is at maximum and not muted and there is no sound upon restart. A dozen Mac web sites apparently all copy each other and never bother to test if a claimed fix works.

MacBook-Pro:~ lloyd$ sudo nvram -p
csr-active-config	%10%00%00%00
gpu-policy	%01
BootAudio	%01
bluetoothInternalControllerInfo	%95%82%ac%05%00%00%00%00%f4%0f$+%ec%e4
wake-failure	%01%15%0f%00
SystemAudioVolumeDB	%dc
fmm-computer-name	MacBook Pro
bluetoothActiveControllerInfo	%95%82%ac%05%00%00%00%00%00%00%f4%0f$+%ec%e4
SystemAudioVolume	7
... 

Enabling the startup chime

Does not work.

The commands shown should be entered in a Terminal window.

To enable the startup chime:

sudo nvram BootAudio=%01

To disable the startup chime (silence):

sudo nvram BootAudio=%00

Bill W writes:

I too cannot get Startup chime re-enabled on Macbook Pro 2016. Did you find an alternative solution?

MPG: nothing yet.

Andrew R writes:

I can confirm this doesn't work! Tried a number of times, no start up tone.

Another issue; can't boot into single user mode. Tried of course Command S, then just S, then Control S; no go. Weird.

DIGLLOYD: so far, no one has stated that it ddoes work.

Auto boot

Not tested or verifed as yet.

Auto-boot means that when the lid of the MBP is opened, it starts up. Given the confusing lack of a power-on button, it is probably best to leave auto-boot enabled.

Disable auto boot:

sudo nvram AutoBoot=%00

Enable auto boot (boots when lid is opened)

sudo nvram AutoBoot=%01

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

2016 MacBook Pro: the Touchbar Already Saving Me Time

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

The OLED display of the touchbar is beautiful to behold, with rich color and crisp detail.

See also Touchbar Notes.

While I have used the touchbar for little as yet, I am already a 'fan' because it is saving me time: every time I am prompted for an administrator password (a lot, when I doing certain things), I just touch the touchbar and my fingerprint instantly takes care of that pesky password dialog.

This is also a security win in one way (potential risks of fingerprint login are beyond my knowledge): there is no need to type a password, hence no one can spy out what is being typed. That’s a good thing in public places, at the least.

Just touch the touchbar instead of entering password

The touchbar is a big win for usability and the learning curve

Insofar as the touchbar merely replaces keyboard shortcuts it is not a win for power users like me, since it is no faster; I can just use the command-key shortcuts.

The touchbar has the the potential to unhide functionality and improve ease of use and already MPG is won over to its merits (in spite of certain confusing trade-offs).

  • To the extent that the touchbar makes visible context-sensitive features that for most users would otherwise remain hidden in the menus or contextual menus, the touchbar is a HUGE win. Non-expert users have a big win here.
  • The ability to touch to complete an action brings the ease of use of iOS to the Mac. While this is not a win for expert users knowing keyboard shortcuts, it makes visible things that might have remained hidden in contextual menus or overloaded main menus and/or submenus. Context-sensitive features on the touchbar thus flatten the learning curve.

In MPG’s view, these are big wins which will play out over time in bringing the ease of use aspects of iOS to the Mac, while avoiding the problemetic approach of making the whole screen touchable.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

2016 MacBook Pro: Hangs on Restart, How to Force Reboot?

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

I restarted the MBP and it hung with that spinning icon thing. But it has no power button so I did not know how to forcibly power it off. The touchbar was blank and was unresponsive to anything; the machine was hung and unusable with a blank screen, aside from that spinning icon thing.

I found this non-obvious solution at Apple (what would I have done without another Mac?!) in How to turn on or turn off your Mac:

MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2016) and MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports): The power button is adjacent to the Touch Bar and integrated with the Touch ID sensor. Press Touch ID (power button) to turn on your Mac.

Not only is the touchbar completely blank when the machine is off (very confusing, where does one press and for how long, etc?!), the touchbar is one long strip, with no power button to be seen! Also, this advice says nothing about powering *off* the Mac, so I missed it at first, But then finally guessing that it meant power on or off, I tried it: pressing and holding the right side of the touchbar did power it off. I still cannot find any power key anywhere! No visual feedback, no tactile feedback, very poor explanation.

When this hang arose, this was all very confusing because there was just a blank touchbar. Nor is it even obvious where one should press on the touchbar, since the touchbar was totally blank. I still don’t know exactly where to press, even with the machine booted up—design insanity.

Once powered off, one has to close the lid and reopen it to boot thing up. Or presumably the touchbar thing works for power on, but its lack of visual or tactile feedback makes it all mysterious. One is just supposed to know to press in some magic spot? How is that better than a power key, which is self evident?

Requiring special knowledge for basic/key operations is poor design judgment.

Also, Apple has removed the startup sound, so there is no feeback that the dang thing is rebooting, until it actually does (update: enable the startup chime). Ditto for restart. Poor feedback again, because one cannot turn away for a moment: it is now required to stare at the computer to confirm if it is going to restart, or if it is going to hang. Nor is there any clue as to when it has started booting up: stare at the screen until it happens, whereas the startup sound was obvious auditory feedback.

Lack of feedback is poor design judgment.

The foregoing is not a criticism of the touchbar per se; I like the touchbar overall and the touchbar has potential for time-saving features.

See also Touchbar Notes.

4TB Internal SSD
for 2013 Mac Pro
Free how-to videos and tools included, 3-year warranty

2016 MacBook Pro: Arrived, Solving the Adapter Mess

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Get OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock or OWC USB-C Dock at MacSales.com.

Also: 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

Setup, and solving the adapter mess

Out of the box, I blanched at connecting a Thunderbolt 2 to gigabit ethernet adapter to a Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter—about 8 inches of chunky adapters before the ethernet cable is plugged in! It’s not obvious how klunky this is until you see it in action—yuck.

Adding a mouse would add yet another adapter, and that’s just getting started on the dongle mess (external drive, camera card reader, and more). A sleek laptop that has to bristle with attachments just for basics: funny how the Real World is never shown in those sleek product shots.

There is a better way—while the OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock is not yet available, the OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock avoids a pile of adapters: plug in a Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter, then cable that to the dock. That’s one adapter, but it adds a plethora of ports, including gigabit ethernet and Thunderbolt 2 and five USB3 ports and Firewire. Nice and 'clean' for desktop scenarios.

The not-yet-shipping Thunderbolt 3 Dock will plug in directly without adapters, but note that the port on the Thunderbolt 2 Dock is Thunderbolt 2, so any Thunderbolt 2 peripheral can be plugged in directly (and more daisy-chained off that device). Whereas the Thunderbolt 3 Dock has a Thunderbolt 3 port, which requires an adapter if one wishes to plug in a TB2 device. Either way, the Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter is needed so you might as well get one.

These solutions are of course for desktop use, since they need wall power.

OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock

The about $149 OWC USB-C Dock works on the 13" model (tested and verified according to OWC), but the 15" model apparently has some issues when restarting the computer or powering on:

We are rescinding 15” compatibility for now… is a firmware update most likely—we are seeing some inconsistency in initial dock power up at connection on just the 15” models. Zero issue on the 13” models. But the 15” sometimes is requiring multiple plug in attempts before the dock comes online recognized by the 15” models we have.

OWC USB-C Dock for MacBook and 2016 MacBook Pro
Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

OWC Offers Up to 40TB SSD in Thunderbay 4 Mini

Now here’s something VERY cool: OWC will be offering the OWC Thunderbay 4 Mini with 10TB, 20TB, 30TB and 40TB SSD capacities.

Not hard drives.

Not the Thunderbay 4 — the Thunderbay 4 Mini, which is highly portable.

No, that is NOT a typo: up to 40 terabytes in the Thunderbay 4 Mini. Awesome—no more 'spinners' (hard disk drives) needed for a nice quiet system.

MPG will be testing the 40TB Thunderbay 4 Mini later this month.

OWC Thunderbay Mini
OWC Thunderbay Mini: up to 40TB SSD option!

Marco Arment: “A world without the Mac Pro”

Update: also good is Adam Engst’s Understanding Apple’s Marginalization of the Mac.

Marco Arment articulates a message that will resonate with any professional in A world without the Mac Pro.

It’s looking increasingly likely that there will never be another Mac Pro. Here’s why that would be a shame.

Pro buyers depend on Apple to make the hardware that satisfies our needs. And we’re flexible. We’ve adapted over the years to new CPU architectures, port changes, capability changes, price increases, and a slower update pace.

The 5K iMac is a truly great computer. It’s the best general-purpose desktop Apple has ever made. It almost replaces the need for the Mac Pro. Many of us can get by with the 5K iMac.

But there are some things that only a Mac Pro can deliver.

...

MPG is in agreement.

See also AN OPEN LETTER TO APPLE FROM THE ACTUAL WORKING PROS.

Unfortunately if Macs are 5% of Apple revenue and Macs continue to be neglected while Apple expands its other lines, they will become 2% or 3% of revenue. What point does a Mac Pro have if it is 1/10 of that revenue? It’s not even a side show. Still, there’s hope: the 2016 MacBook Pro apparently is garnering a lot of revenue.

My wish list for a future Mac Pro. If necessary, supersize the existing form factor, do whatever it takes and make it a true pro machine:

  • Bring back dual CPU options, or at the least offer a wide range of options up to the 22 core Xeon CPU.
  • Up to 256GB memory.
  • At least 8 and preferably 12 Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C ports.
  • Six built-in USB 3.0 ports for compatibility without existing adapters or hubs. Built-in SD card slot.
  • Ability to drive dual 5K displays.
  • 2TB or 4TB or 8TB inernal SSD options running at 3GB/sec or faster with pro-grade lifespan.
  • Top-of-class GPU, with the 2nd GPU made optional.

The Internet of Things is a Disaster Waiting to Happen (Self-Propagating Smart Light Bulb Worm)

From Bruce Schneier’s excellent security blog:

Abstract: Within the next few years, billions of IoT devices will densely populate our cities. In this paper we describe a new type of threat in which adjacent IoT devices will infect each other with a worm that will spread explosively over large areas in a kind of nuclear chain reaction, provided that the density of compatible IoT devices exceeds a certain critical mass.

In particular, we developed and verified such an infection using the popular Philips Hue smart lamps as a platform. The worm spreads by jumping directly from one lamp to its neighbors, using only their built-in ZigBee wireless connectivity and their physical proximity. The attack can start by plugging in a single infected bulb anywhere in the city, and then catastrophically spread everywhere within minutes, enabling the attacker to turn all the city lights on or off, permanently brick them, or exploit them in a massive DDOS attack.

MPG: the idea of internet-connected anything (except computers and equivalents) has struck me as an incredibly ignorant and short-sighted idea for more than a decade. This case confirms that suspicion. I won’t be buying any Philips LED bulbs!

How about another really, really Bad Idea: the forced conversion (including my home) of electricity meters to ones that communicate wirelessly and related cruft, all on the internet. How about shutting down an entire state’s electricity grid for even a few days? That’s the future of warfare, if nothing else. And already probes are in progress using the IoT: witness the very recent massive DDOS attack that took out key internet services like NetFlex by attacking DNS provider Dyn.

The IoT is a massive national security risk, because it puts every kind of infrastructure at risk. Imagine a few billion IoT devices put to work hitting all major internet service providers, along with electrical power stations, banks, dams and so on. Not a pretty thing to contemplate.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

2016 MacBook Pro: Pros and Cons Abound

Joe M writes:

What's "cumbersome" is current camera wireless transfer techniques. By contrast an SD card slot in an expensive Pro laptop is "useful".

It is ironic that Jony Ive is often lauded for his clean, Bauhaus-inspired work. A key tenet of Bauhaus design is "form follows function". The 2016 MacBook Pro is the *opposite* -- function is sacrificed at the altar of form.

Such design decisions could be termed mindless minimalism. It is worse than past design fads such as automotive tail fins, which were ornamental but at least did not subtract from function.

MPG: Let’s examine that idea on the merits, that is, how well “form follows function”. I’m going to assume that the “function” is not to look cool while sipping $6 lattés and checking email and watching videos (a MacBook will do just fine for consumption of all those kinds), but for serious professionals looking to create content and get work done, particularly photographers and videographers and so on.

Looked at this way, it’s easy to see why MacBook Pro users are conflicted; there are too many losing propositions competing against the gains. As per a reader:

... Apple will see an overall lift in sales and declare it a success even where it’s failed to capture the larger sales/lift/base it could have.

Good is not great. The 2016 MacBook Pro is good, but it falls short of the gold.

See also 2016 MacBook Pro: What Options I Ordered, and Why.

Aspect Functionality
Size and weight a good bit lighter
battery life slightly longer
SSD up to 2TB internal, blazingly fast class leading performance (!) but soldered on, so buy a new computer if it fails?
I/O performance and connectivity Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C offer a lot of potential.
5K/4K display support very cool for those who want to use it as a desktop
display (!) Mixed blessing: DCI P3 color gamut (claimed), but only 8-bit color!
CPU Presumably marginally faster, but from from compelling.
GPU Presumably faster, but the GPU is fractionally as fast as some PC laptops.
cost Most expensive Apple laptop yet if 2TB SSD is chosen. The function to cost ratio has hardly budged albeit each new MacBook Pro acquires reasonably current technology.
16GB memory limit (!) no change, and it’s supposed to be a pro laptop. For a user looking for one pro level machine, this may force purchase of a 2nd more capable machine for use when not on the road. That said, most users will do fine with 16GB.
keyboard (!!!) faux MacBook style keys; toy keyboard.
SD card reader (!!!) forces user to carry external card reader
total form factor, compatibility (!!!) forces user to carry a bag of dongles
built-in cellular (like an iPad) no change but in late 2016 the lack of built-in cell-phone internet connectivity is lame. Tethering is fine, but internal connectivity has its uses too.

Edward A writes:

This article about the Macbook Pro and Mindless Minimalism reminds me what has happened to the iMac. Obviously the iMac is not meant to be a portable device. But, the older iMacs were relatively easy to upgrade RAM and HDD, and there was space in the case for an optical drive. Now, that has changed. Apple has decided to condense the iMac, as though “thin” is now the new “cool”. I.e. Mindless Minimalism. This is leading to machines that, when they break, have to go straight into a landfill. Reminds me of the planned obsolescence in the auto industry that became rampant in the 1950s. Perhaps Apple should add tail fins and four headlights to the new iMacs.

MPG: thin trumps the ability to easily add or change a hard drive or SSD internally (it is quite a delicate and involved task).

Envoy Pro mini - In Motion There Exists Great Potential

OWC Announces Updated Mercury Elite Pro Dual

OWC has released a new version of its OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual.

The Hardware RAID Workhorse

Reliable hardware RAID maximizes the full potential of two 3.5" 7200RPM hard drives in the Mercury Elite Pro Dual. It comes configured in high-speed RAID 0 mode for the maximum sustained throughput from your drives. With speeds up to 407MB/s, that's fast enough for HD video workflows. Configure the Mercury Elite Pro Dual in RAID 1 mode for the extra security of mirrored data, set up a span of the two drives, or use them independently.

Performance by Design

Mercury Elite Pro Dual features both high-speed USB 3.1 Gen 1 and eSATA ports to offer the connectivity and versatility to work with your current equipment at extreme speeds. A second-generation, free-flowing brushed-aluminum chassis with high-performance fan delivers cool, quiet operation. In addition, drive-activity LEDs give you an instant snapshot of the status of your RAID, and intelligent power management conserves energy and reduces wear by automatically spinning down the drives when inactive.

Quality You Can Trust

Like all OWC drives, Mercury Elite Pro Dual is built to the highest standards of reliability and performance. Because 100% reliability is always the goal, Mercury Elite Pro Dual is rigorously quality tested, and backed by an OWC 3 year limited warranty* and 24/7 customer support.

OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual capacities
OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dual

Apple Cuts Prices Substantially on Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C Adapters

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

In a class act, and one for which MPG claims no credit in spite of pointing out how cheap it felt, Apple has dropped prices substantially on most of the USB-C adapters and cables needed for the new 2016 MacBook Pro, which has Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C ports.

I called Apple support for my own order of various adapters. Apple issued a refund—but it looks like another conversation is needed because only $20 was refunded, and it seems that the refund was for only one item rather than all four items ordered.

It’s good news that the adapter cost has come down considerably. For example, the Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter has dropped from $49 to $29. That’s much more palatable.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

OWC Infographic: Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Thunderbolt and USB standards can be very confusing. OWC has prepared this helpful infographic explaining the differences.

You can pre-order the OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock with 13 ports of connectivity as well as USB-C cables and adapters.

Thunderbolt 3 cables (which subsume USB-C) are a better choice (handling both Thunderbolt 3 and USB-C), but will be more expensive and are not yet available.

Missing/not noted in graphic: Thunderbolt 3 can drive one 5K display which supports Thunderbolt 3, or two 4K displays via Mini DisplayPort.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC Thunderbolt 3 / USB-C Infographic

2016 MacBook Pro: USB-C Might Offer Massive Runtime via External Batteries

Mac wish list •  all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo • all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models •  all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Battery Menu 2016 MacBook Pro w/
Anker PowerCore+ 20100 battery

Update 19 Nov 2016: I am disappointed to report that the Anker batteries fail to supply charging power to the 2015 MacBook pro 15" model, even though the MBP shows a lightning icon and indicates that it is on a power adapter. An inquiry is in to Anker tech support.

...

A few months ago I looked into off-grid power options. See my review: Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C Charger Battery for iPhone/iPad/Cameras/MacBook/etc.

One terrific feature of USB-C is the ability to power the laptop via a battery. The MacBook could/can do this, and now the 2016 MacBook Pro.

Take a look at the amp hours with the batteries involved:

  Battery Power
Apple 2016 MacBook Pro 13" (non-touchbar): 54.5 watt hours
Apple 2016 MacBook Pro 13" (touchbar): 49.2 watt hours
Apple 2016 MacBook Pro 15" model: 76 watt hours
Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C 74 watt hours
Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C battery

The about $60 Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C is a compact 74 watt-hour battery that weighs only 467 grams (517g with soft case and two USB cables)—about one pound. I have used it in the field when backpacking to recharge Sony A7R II batteries as well as a Fenix flashlight. It can also be solar charged.

The Anker PowerCore+ 20100 has the ~same capacity as the internal 15" MacBook Pro battery (within 2Wh). Plug it into any USB-C port, and it is rated to deliver 2.4 amps at 5V = 12 watts. That’s not enough for full load with all CPUs cranking, but it’s ample for most any kind of steady state usage.

So for about $60 you can attach Anker PowerCore+ 20100 USB-C and in theory just about double your runtime.

It seems to me that we now have an unprecedented “clean” solution to powering a laptop in the field, that is, one without special connectors, patent-violating connectors and so on—just standard interchangeable USB-C that works on any port on the MacBook Pro.

Since Apple rates the MacBook Pro runtime at about 10 hours, in theory the Anker battery could double the runtime. Two of them could triple it, for only about 2 pounds of weight.

Theory is one thing and such things have to be verified. As I have two of the Anker PowerCore+ 20100 batteries, I will be testing them and verifying this exciting potential for being able to use a laptop a very long time without AC power.

 

OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock: 13 Ports that Solve the Compatibility Headaches with the 2016 MacBook Pro

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

When desktop usage is the scenario (AC power is available), the OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock solves most of the the compatibility headaches: see 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

  • Dual Thunderbolt 3 ports
  • Five (5) USB 3.1 Gen 1 ports, including one high-power port
  • Gigabit ethernet
  • SD card reader
  • Audio in/out
  • S/PDIF pro-grade digital audio for lossless signal transfer
  • Mini DisplayPort for attaching a display.
  • Firewire 800
  • Should be possible to plug in 5K display to one of the Thunderbolt 3 ports.

The OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock is available for pre-order.

There are a few limitations.

  • This is a desktop device that requires AC power.
  • To use a Thunderbolt 2 device, the Apple Thunderbolt 3 Male to Thunderbolt 2 Female Adapter will need to be plugged into the Thunderbolt 3 port on the Dock. But since Thunderbolt 2 can be daisy chained, a number of devices can hang off that one port, leaving the other port free.
  • The USB ports are Gen 1 (5 Gb/sec just like on all current Macs), not Gen 2 (10 Gb/sec). According to OWC, Gen 2 ports would have raised the cost substantially. However, it should be possible to plug in a USB 3.1 Gen 2 Hub (when available) off one of the Thunderbolt 3 ports (see for example Expanding USB3 Ports: TRIPP LITE 7+1 USB3 with iPad Charging).

Continues below.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock port layout

Description:

With the 13 ports you need, OWC’s new Thunderbolt 3 Dock brings unbelievable connectivity to your laptop through an included Thunderbolt 3 cable, and, delivers charging power to your laptop and other devices, all at the fastest speeds possible.

Thunderbolt 3 Dock delivers more connectivity, more power, and charging capability than ever before all at the fastest speed available today so all your connected devices perform at their maximum. Drive two 4K displays, connect and charge up to six USB devices, work with legacy FireWire storage, enjoy pristine audio, wired networks, and read SD cards, all at twice the speed of Thunderbolt 2 and all through a single cable. The possibilities are endless.

Because Thunderbolt 3 delivers phenomenal bandwidth up to 40Gb/s, Thunderbolt 3 Dock can be the foundation of your perfect custom display setup. Add two ultra HD 4K displays, or a combination of 4K, HD and other displays with the mini DisplayPort port and additional Thunderbolt 3 port.

If you’re a pro working in the creative industries, you probably have a highly specialized workflow complete with specialized and legacy ports like FireWire and optical audio. The OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock supports FW800 and S/PDIF optical audio, as well as an SD card reader and analog stereo audio.

2 Year OWC Limited Warranty

The best warranty is one you never have to use, but should the need occur — OWC is proud to provide a superior level of support and warranty coverage to our customers. Even when not used, we understand the peace of mind afforded by a longer warranty period. OWC's industry leading coverage is a testament to our confidence in the reliability of the solutions that we offer. OWC connectivity solutions are engineered to demanding quality standards in order to deliver the most reliable, highest performance available on the market.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock, front view with SD card slot and headphone jack and USB port
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock, rear ports
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock, in situ
Mac Pro or iMac or MacBook Pro?
Storage, Backup, RAID?
Buy now or wait?

✓ diglloyd consulting starts you out on solid footing.

2016 MacBook Pro: Firewire 800 Compatibility

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

See also 2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

UPDATE: the OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock with FireWire is the best solution. The dock will direct connect to a Thunderbolt 3 port on the 2016 MacBook Pro while providing a bunch of ports, including Firewire.

Nancy P writes:

Don't laugh - I still have two 2TB FireWire 800 drives as my backup JBOD system. Eventually I may upgrade, but I have to deal with the hardware on hand, used on my mid 2010 MBP 15" (non-Retina). I bet there are more users out there who upgrade laptops only every 5 to 6 years or so and who are wondering about those FW drives.

Recommendations? Please consider adding them to the fine "adapters for late 2016 MBPs" post. Thanks!

MPG: LOL!

This is not a good backup system and drives fail with age also. I recommend no fewer than two external backups kept away from the computer, plus one always-attached Time Machine backup plus one always-attached clone backup. On the road, I like the OWC Envoy Pro EX 1TB.

I do not advise this kludge, but if you're willing to use up a port, you can use the Apple TB3 (USB-C) to TB2 ADAPTER along with the Apple Thunderbolt To Firewire Adapter. But spending $79 for such a messy solution does not make sense to me. Fortunately, Firewire can be daisy-chained.

MUCH better in this case is to not waste money on adapters of that sort. Instead buy new and much faster USB3 mini drives (or full size) and connect through any OWC Dock or USB Type-A to USB Type-C Adapter. If you can afford a new MacBook Pro, you can afford proper backup.

The OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock is a far better value than individual adapters and with many more ports; it would be connected via the Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 adapter. See the Firewire 800 port and other ports below.

OWC Thunderbolty 3 Dock
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

Reader Comment: Apple Pro Division?

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.

See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Don H writes:

As long as Apple is marching to one master (high-margin consumer sales) the idea of ‘professional’ products doesn’t stand a chance. It’s just too much in conflict with the end-game of a consumer product company, even one as capable as Apple.

I’m now wondering if a possible way out would be for Apple to create a ‘Professional Division’ (don’t even use the word ‘Pro’ which has lost all meaning, not only within Apple’s products but in just about every other industry). Set it up as a separate profit center, and incorporate not just hardware but also software (Final Cut, developer tools, even the not-talked-about stepchild that is Filemaker), and most important - a ‘professional’ version of Mac OS. Strip out all the consumer gewgaws that are always in a half-assed developmental state and just provide a bulletproof base of operations for people who actually use their computers for their livelihood. Don’t let Eddy Cue anywhere near the premises.

This would free up the professional hardware and software to include more ‘legacy’ interfaces or other functionality that has been stripped out over the years, and if it ends up costing more then that’s the price we’ll have to pay. (Either that, or people will end up switching platforms, which is happening anyway.) Apple can still leverage their economies of scale for most components, but the professional product lines wouldn’t have all the utility squeezed out of them for the sake of mass consumer appeal.

I know this is most likely a pipe dream, and the logistics of maintaining separate product lines while keeping key technologies in sync is hardly a trivial task. But many auto manufacturers have been doing this for at least a century with their truck and heavy equipment divisions. And the question I’d like to see asked of Tim Cook, point-blank in front of reporters, is “What do your own internal developers use to get their jobs done?”

I don’t think an Apple Car can be designed using iPads and a touch-based drawing program downloaded from the App Store...

MPG: pipe dream. And I agree that the Apple Car should be designed on an iPad, as per Tim Cook’s assertion that there is no reason to buy a computer.

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

2016 MacBook Pro: High Sales + Schiller on the Omission of an SD Slot

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.

See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Apple’s Phill Schiller is quoted as saying:

And we are proud to tell you that so far our online store has had more orders for the new MacBook Pro than any other pro notebook before. So there certainly are a lot of people as excited as we are about it.

When you sit all but idle for 4+ years in the pro laptop space, and then finally produce a gorgeous laptop, one would hope for strong sales. This is excitement to be sure, but who wouldn’t get excited about selling the '08 Camry for a new car?

When the robust workhorse 2013 Mac Pro that is nonetheless an aging out-of-date underpowered computer is updated, will we read the same sort of twaddle about an improved model that lacks pro features yet again?

Properly speaking, praise is deserved for relentless uncompromising advancements as quickly as possible. Apple has done this with iPhone, but let Macs languish. How about just refreshes with the best and fastest CPUs, larger and faster SSDs, if nothing else? This Apple has not done for 4-5 years, not at all in most cases, and in no meaningful way in others. For example, where is a 2TB SSD option (and upgrade) for the 2013 Mac Pro with the 3GB/sec performance claimed in the MBP? That alone would be news, along with the latest fastest CPUs. Such things Apple just does not do: Apple never honors customer investment in a platform, particularly when it comes to allegedly pro software like Final Cut (yearlong incompatibility with past projects plus wanton arbitrary changes), and a discontinued Aperture that can’t even be downloaded anymore.

The SD card reader slot

From my perspective, Phil Schiller’s perspective on card readers is that of someone who has a dim understanding of the pro and high-end photography market (my specialty) and video market, namely that the vast majority of cameras sold today (even pro cameras) have SDXC card slots (my pro Canon, Nikon, Sony, Sigma, Leica cameras all do so I rarely use CF cards any more). Schiller’s lame rationalization might be accepted by the ignorant:

SanDisk USB-C SD card reader
(no more SD slot in MBP)

...it’s a bit of a cumbersome slot. You've got this thing sticking halfway out. Then there are very fine and fast USB card readers, and then you can use CompactFlash as well as SD. So we could never really resolve this – we picked SD because more consumer cameras have SD but you can only pick one. So, that was a bit of a trade-off. And then more and more cameras are starting to build wireless transfer into the camera. That’s proving very useful. So we think there’s a path forward where you can use a physical adaptor if you want, or do wireless transfer.

The SD card “sticks out” only when downloading and not by much (does he have any idea of the tiny size of the “thing”?). Second, NONE of my pro cameras have wireless transfer (though one has unusable wireless feature). And is he joking about wireless transfer? I’m going to transfer a single day’s shoot of 20 to 50 gigabytes of raw files over wireless? Or 400GB of video clips? Seriously? WAFM. All while draining the camera battery and taking the camera out of commission while downloading? It shows a gross ignorance of the issues involved. The classic “marketing bozo”.

Finally, can you trust anyone so prone to misrepresentation (the “sticking out” thing) that an external reader (sold by Apple as the solution) is 10X worse? Apple’s polished execs are as smooth and slippery as politicians when they can put over that kind of claim in the face of this self evident visual rebuttal. What is the risk of damage to the computer when this kind of phallic adapter is inserted and then bumped or leveraged? I sit in my car while downloading in the field, not in some cute little coffee shop buying $5 lattes watching movies on a $4400 laptop.

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

2016 MacBook Pro: SSD Speed

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.

See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Jonathan P writes:

I'm sure you're aware that LaCie has announced a couple of new SSD RAID drives, one of which, the 2TB Bolt3, is said to approach read speeds of 2,800 MB/s, which I assume will outrun the new MacBook's internal SSD.

I take it you're not a fan of LaCie (not sure), but I've been using their portable Backup Plus Fast and 4TB Rugged RAID drives for several years without a single hitch. I also have a few 4TB LaCie desktop Porsche design hard drives that have also been reliable. I realize those are too slow and too small for the work you do, and not really configurable to your liking, but I'm just a hobbyist. If the Bolt3 didn't run $2,000, I might consider it. At the moment, I shoot with a LUMIX GH4 and downsample to 1080p for delivery to YouTube. I really appreciate all the work you do.

MPG: As I understand it, only the LaCie Bolt is an SSD, the others are hard-drive based. My confusion stems from the most obtusely written press release I can ever recall reading. Why companies write such stuff is baffling. The point is to communicate, and the press release is a failure that left me puzzling through it.

I have little experience with LaCie products, because I can’t review what I can’t easily obtain. My time is always under pressure, and if a company doesn’t want to respond quickly or seek me out, then I generally cannot afford to pursue dead ends or to waste my time justifying my request according to some generic rules-based process at Company X. Recommending products that I have not personally tested is a bad protocol for everyone, so I avoid that. Accordingly, I cannot recommend the LaCie Bolt, but by the same token I am not dis-recommending it. The foregoing is an open offer for the folks at LaCie to contact me and send me a LaCie Bolt and their other products for testing.

SSD speed

Apple is claiming 3GB/sec for the internal SSD of the 2016 MacBook Pro, which is faster than the LaCie Bolt claim. I say “claim” because performance is much more complex than one number. The 3000 MB/sec = 2.86 MiB/sec or 2800MB/sec = 2.67 MiB/sec figures are sustained throughput—best case with very large transfers.

Take a look at actual behavior in the graph below, which shows throughput (MiB/sec) versus transfer size*. The Apple and LaCie offerings are going to behave according to this same pattern. The quoted figures are best-case for large transfers only. Yet in the real world, typically 99% of transfers are ~1MB or smaller!

Accordingly, factors like latency and how many requests per second can be handled figure into actual real world performance.

As I understand it, latency is inherently higher over Thunderbolt 3 than the direct-connect PCIe bus of the internal SSD. Moreover I expect the Apple internal SSD to be a very high performance design. Therefore I expect the Apple internal SSD to outperform anything and everything.

What the Apple internal SSD is likely to be less good at is industrial-grade longevity (over provisioning and such). So peak speed alone is a poor metric by itself: for professional use a device must meet or exceed and sustain a critical performance metric, and be designed for 3 or 5 years of taking a beating. Thus a slower offering may well be a far superior choice for some applications.

* MiB = 1024 * 1024 and MB = 1000 * 1000

Example of SSD performance behavior below.

Transfer speed vs transfer size for OWC 960GB Aura SSD in MacBook Air

2016 MacBook Pro: What Options I Ordered, and Why

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo. See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

MPG strongly recommends the 1TB or 2TB flash drive (SSD) option in the 2016 model because there is no way to achieve similar performance externally, at least not yet and maybe never.

This discussion is aimed at professional work and at those who just want the best. Notet that the “best” in a Mac Pro is not so clear-cut, but in a laptop it generally means adding all the options.

What matters, and why?

  • Memory on the 2016 MacBook Pro is soldered onto the logic board. No upgrade possibility—ever. So it is foolish to get only 8GB for any kind of professional use (Photoshop, Lightroom, video, etc). While 8GB is fine for web and email browsing and various non-demanding tasks, the rational for a top-end laptop is somewhat at odds with 8GB memory—a MacBook will do just fine for travel and so on. So if there is a real need for a MacBook Pro, 16GB just is the only sensible option.
  • The CPU speed is something you experience every day in every app, so the fastest CPU make sense. But the difference is only about 11% and thus hardly noticeable, so if the budget is tight, put the money into 16GB memory and/or larger SSD.
  • CPU cores: unless smaller size is of paramount concern (13" vs 15" model), 2 CPU cores (13" model) instead of 4 CPU cores is a very poor tradeoff, particularly with the escalating costs of a large SSD and 16GB memory and GPU upgrade. Ask yourself if saving 5% of the total cost for a slower CPU makes sense—it does not to me.
  • The SSD is in theory upgradeable, but that is costly even if (and that’s a big 'if') an upgrade could deliver the unprecedented 3GB/sec that Apple states. That kind of speed is as huge win, so don’t cut it tight on SSD capacity. 512MB must be considered an absolute minimum, but this is likely to prove unwise—go with the 1TB SSD, or 2TB if you like to carry additional stuff around like music or a lot of images and video footage. It saves a lot of hassle when on the road just to have it all there.
  • If you’re a Photoshop or Lightroom or video user or a gamer, the GPU upgrade is essential. Photoshop and Lightroom use the GPU increasingly, so this is now just as important as CPU speed in those programs.
  • The new Touchbar is hard to speak to; it is cool and nifty, but some users may prefer conventional function keys. Or that touchbar may prove useful over time as software is developed to make sensible use of it. Since the touchbar is omitted only for the starter model, it is not really relevant to this discussion.

In short, there are no real choices if using the MacBook Pro for professional work, except perhaps the 1TB vs 2TB SSD option. You just want a maxed-out 15" MacBook Pro or a maxed-out 13" MacBook Pro. But if the budget is tight and you still want a MacBook Pro and the cost is too high: go with 16GB and the largest SSD you can afford, sticking with the base CPU and base GPU options. You will still have a very find computer.

But wait, there’s more (cost), which raises the total system cost. Total everything up before making decisions above that may prove unwise.

Don’t forget adapters for compatibility.

Configuring the late 2016 Apple MacBook Pro for high performance

 

2016 MacBook Pro: the 16GB Memory Limit in the + CPU Speed vs Other Macs

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Lawrence F writes:

What are your thoughts about the new MacBook Pro as it relates to Photoshop and Lightroom? Are 16 gigs of RAM enough?

MPG: for most users operating on up to half dozen images up to 50 megapixels (or perhaps even 100 megapixels), 16GB memory will get the job done. It may squeeze other applications if one works as I do with multiple apps all at once. However, the compressed virtual memory feature of OS X El Capitan and macOS Sierra is very effective at making 16GB work more like something closer to 24GB as compared to ealier OS releases—but if and only if the memory usage is amenable to compression, so it all depends. Still, let’s say that 16GB is the new 20GB in operational terms.

With the 2016 MacBook Pro, there is a mitigating factor that plays a VERY large role: the speed of virtual memory swapping. If I understand correctly (to be tested and proven once I get my 2016 MBP with its 2TB SSD), the internal flash drive (SSD) in the 2016 MBP approaches something like 3000 MB/sec (3 GB/sec) and presumably also has very low latency with its PCIe based SSD. With very low latency and high bandwidth, the effects of low memory and the accompanying virtual memory swapping will be mitigated to an unprecedented degree, greatly muting the performance hit of having only 16GB. Of course nothing beats having 32GB or 64GB of real memory.

MPG strongly recommends the 1TB or 2TB option in the 2016 model because there is no way to achieve similar performance externally, at least not yet and maybe never.

Shootouts from the 2015 MacBook Pro vs the 2013 MacBook Pro where the only significant difference is SSD performance show huge gains:

Ian K writes:

As a long time subscriber, I very much appreciate the quality of information presented on your site.

Like you and many other subscribers, I have been waiting “forever" for Apple to replace the Mac Pro. I am still using my old 2010 model purchased on your then recommendations and it has served me well with a few minor upgrades. I held off on the 2013 “trashcan” because I, like many others, thought Apple would be upgrading it soon; 2015..! 2016..!

Compounding the situation was the ever increasing power of the Mac Book Pro lineup which offered an alternative. The solution; wait until Apple looks after their original core users; professionals and prosumers, and releases an amazing new Mac Pro. Looks like the “team” at Apple tasked with this are still out to lunch.!

Which brings me to the current dilemma. If we assume that a new Mac Pro is not on the cards anytime soon, how does the new 2016 15in Mac Book Pro (high-end model) hold up against a 2013 Mac Pro for normal photographic use; Lightroom, Photoshop, etc? Is there going to be a huge difference in performance?

MPG: I’ll be testing to answer such questions specifically.

Unless a laptop is needed, I’d say go with the late 2015 iMac 5K: faster CPU and a 5K display are a big win—for less money. Right now, USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 have little to nothing to offer for desktop users except port compatibility hassles.

But assuming a laptop is the choice—first, see the above discussion of flash drive (SSD) speed. I expect the 2016 MacBook Pro to show modest performance gains vs the 2015 model: faster SSD plus slightly faster CPU and memory system. It depends on software however; internal bottlenecks in Photoshop or Lightroom may mute actual gains. Moreover the those programs use the GPU heavily now, and it’s not clear to me how powerful the GPU is in the 2016 MacBook Pro.

Still, I would say this as the bottom line: most users are likely to find the 2016 MacBook Pro shockingly fast and quite competitive with the 2013 Mac Pro. That’s assuming work that doesn’t push beyond what 16GB memory can handle and/or tasks that don’t benefit strongly from the 6 or 8 or 10 or 12 CPU cores possible in a Mac Pro (excluding specialty filters, Photoshop and Lightroom hardly use 4 cores well for most tasks). For example, Lightroom “Import” benefits from 8 CPU cores, but the slower clock speed and older CPU design of the 2013 Mac Pro (and slower SSD) means that actual gains are relatively modest. There are other considerations with only 4 CPU cores, but for most users these may not be a primary considerations.

Why no Included Adapters with new Macbook Pro?

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

OWC USB-C to USB adapter

The new (“late 2016”) Apple MacBook Pro touchbar models have four Thunderbolt 3/USB-C ports (2 ports for the 13" non-touchbar model). These ports are incompatible with USB and Thunderbolt 2 and displays without adapters, rendering any and all prior peripherals unusable without the necessary adapters (USB hard drives, Thunderbolt 2 devices, displays, card readers, etc).

Prior MacBook Pro models included adapters, but never has such a severe incompatibility switchover happened as with the 2016 MacBook Pro. And yet we get ZERO adapters in the box.

Is it too much to ask that a $2399 to $4400 laptop (15" model) include a few common adapter cables, given the incompatible-with-everything ports?

This is as stripped-down as it gets. Apple could generate a lot of goodwill by including adapters for USB and Thunderbolt 2/Mini DisplayPort in the box. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out. But WAIT, it’s even more 'cheap': Apple has removed the extension cable for the power adapter (now an extra $19.99) and even removed the little “wings’ on the power brick (convenient for travel).

But I probably have it all wrong: the genius Apple alludes to is in part raising profit margins by charging for basics, knowing that anyone upgrading *must* get at least a couple of adapters (if for nothing else than a USB backup drive or card reader or existing wired keyboard or mouse, etc).

Compatibility Hardware for New Apple MacBook Pro (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc).

As it stands, there is a hidden extra cost of $200 or more if you’re like me and want to attach a USB3 SSD, USB3 card reader, Thunderbolt device, external display, etc. That’s about a 5% to 7% hidden cost increase. OWC has USB-C to USB adapter cables for about $9.99 so at least there is a low cost option for that common use case. Which brings the point to it: why isn’t there at least one token USB-C to USB adapter in the Apple box?

Apple’s Phil Schiller:

To be fair it has been a bit of a surprise to me. But then, it shouldn’t be. I have never seen a great new Apple product that didn’t have its share of early criticism and debate — and that’s cool. We took a bold risk, and of course with every step forward there is also some change to deal with. Our customers are so passionate, which is amazing.

We care about what they love and what they are worried about. And it's our job to help people through these changes. We know we made good decisions about what to build into the new MacBook Pro and that the result is the best notebook ever made, but it might not be right for everyone on day one. That’s okay, some people felt that way about the first iMac and that turned out pretty good.

Presumably “help people through these changes” means helping lighten wallets by charging high prices for for all the adapters they will need, on top of the cost of the MacBook Pro itself. How supportive.

As for elegance, the idea that I must now carry (at the least) a very awkward (sticks out a couple of inches) external SD card reader is far from elegant. Elegance of design cannot be taken only in the context of a studio shot of a sleek item free of all the encumbrances actually required to use it appropriately. By the way, how does Phil Schiller “know” they made good decisions? Because Jony Ive told him so?

But to be fair, there are many outstanding aspects to the design of the 2016 MacBook Pro. Indeed, it is the best Apple laptop yet. But only someone whose thought processes intentionly or incometently omit usage considerations can have the hubris to call it a work of genius. It is not. When critical things like an SD card reader and a built-in cellular modem are omitted, there is no video compatibility or compatibility for anything without adapters, and too few ports, I don’t call that elegant in the proper context of a pro machine used by photographers, videographers and other professionals. This is not a email and web computer; a MacBook is far smaller and lighter and does just fine for that.

Stripped-down — no adapters supplied
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

Saving 5GB or so from iTunes

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo.

The previous post discussed saving 8 to 12GB with XCode, depending on what you’re developing for.

With iTunes, each type of iPhone (or iPad) can cache a restore file of multiple gigabytes. The chances of having to do a restore of my phones is slim (I think I’ve done it once in 5 years or so), yet iTunes favors wasting 4.95GB on my SSD boot drive (iTunes will download again if the restore files are not cached).

Accordingly, these iPhone/iPad restore files can be removed in the Finder, or with this command (in blue) in Terminal:

diglloydMP:MPG lloyd$ rm -rf ~/Library/iTunes/iPhone\ Software\ Updates

Bingo—5GB more free space on my boot drive. The savings would be larger if another version of iPhone and/or iPad were present (e.g., iPhone 7), since each device can have its own restore file. Or it could be less if only one variant of iPhone/iPad were in use. Or no savings at all if you don’t connect/update an iPhone or iPad on that computer.

Add that to the 12GB that I saved with Xcode for a whopping 17GB of total space savings. Other things are possible too, like removing crapware (my perspective) like Garage Band and its support files.

iTunes cached restore images for iPhone

While we’re at it, why do I want gigabytes of iPhone crash logs on my Mac, most of which are ancient cruft? None of them have any value, yet they’re eating up 2.63GB of space on my Mac.

diglloydMP:MPG lloyd$ rm -rf ~/Library/Logs/CrashReporter/MobileDevice/*

Bingo—another 2.6GB saved or about 7.6GB for iTunes/iPhone related stuff, all of which had zero value.

2.63GB of crash logs for iPhoner/iPad over some years

That’s a total of nearly 20GB between iTunes and XCode cruft. If you have a 128GB or 256GB SSD, saving 20GB is a huge gain.

Why should users have to bother with this nonsense? It is a classic Windows PC defect to have to do such ridiculous things.

In macOS Sierra, Information => Storage lets a user remove certain files. Caution though, it likes to offer to delete files of your own you might want, only because you have not accessed them in a while (think family photos!).

System Information => Storage => iOS Files

 

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

Saving up to 8.5GB of Space After Every Apple Xcode Update

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo.

8.87GB of XCode platforms (default install)

As a developer, I 'enjoy' frequent Apple XCode updates—roughly a 5GB download of which 90% is nothing I ever use (iOS and Apple TV and WatchOS platforms); I need Xcode support only for macOS development (the latest 'upgrade' crashes 100% of the time building diglloydTools...sigh). Yet the XCode updater insists on downloading and installing all development platforms, even for minor updates.

I wouldn’t care if the space used weren’t so substantial, but anyone with a 128GB or 256GB or 512GB SSD might care, as I do.

In my travel laptop I currently have only a 512GB flash drive (which is really only 500GB). Because of fixed requirements (stuff I absolutely must have onboard), my typical free space is only around 180GB. Space has gotten so tight on some photography trips* that I have been forced into external overflow storage which I greatly prefer to avoid as it greatly complicates working and backing up in the field, and is physically awkward in a car, more devices to carry, etc).

As shown at right, the Xcode Platforms folder uses 8.87 GB of space, of which about 8.5GB are platform support folders that I never use. That represents nearly 5% of the available free space on my laptop, so it makes sense to reclaim it.

Here’s how I reclaim the space after XCode is updated by removing unused platform support folders. Commands are shown in blue, as used in Terminal.

diglloydMP:MPG lloyd$ cd /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/
diglloydMP:Platforms lloyd$ sudo rm -rf AppleTV* Watch* iPhone*

After the above removal, the Platforms folder now occupies only 0.41GB instead of 8.87GB, a savings of 8.46GB. Want more?

# OPTIONAL: save another half-gigabyte if not using SWIFT:
diglloydMP:Developer lloyd$ sudo rm -rf /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/Swift_2.3.xctoolchain
# OPTIONAL: save another 3.1GB by removing (not always this large, but can be)
diglloydMP:~ lloyd$ rm -rf ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/iOS\ DeviceSupport/
# OPTIONAL: remove support for iPhone/iPad/etc simulators (up to another gigabyte or so)
diglloydMP:~ lloyd$ rm -rf ~/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/*

That’s a total savings of 12GB! It speaks to incoherent software management that Apple pushes complex (and potentially dangerous) cloud-based solutions for saving space in macOS Sierra without first eliminating the brain-dead space-wasting XCode behavior. The solution is obvious: install an inner core Xcode, then allow the user to add on whatever platforms and support are wanted. Don’t just shovel out unwanted bloatware.

Obviously one must not remove platform support needed for code development for that platform. But if like me you develop for only one or two of the platforms, space can be reclaimed. There aren’t that many “free lunches” for getting back that much space.

The 2016 MacBook Pro I’ve ordered with the 2TB SSD—I’m not going to make the same mistake twice (going with too small an SSD). Update: returned it for reasons unrelated to the SSD.

8.5GB space savings removing unused XCode platforms
Upgrade Your Mac Memory
At much lower cost than Apple, with more options.
Lloyd recommends 64GB for iMac or Mac Pro for photography/videography.

The 'Killer' Feature of the 2016 MacBook Pro : Best Laptop Display Gamut Yet?

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

OWC has high quality USB-C to USB cables as well as regular USB and USB-C cables, the easy route to compatibility for USB devices.

Update 18 Nov 2016: 8 bit color only.

The killer feature of the late 2016 Apple MacBook Pro may be its wide-gamut display, the best ever offered by Apple, and perhaps the best in any laptop—to be seen. Apple claims that the display is not only much brighter, but supports the full DCI-P3 color gamut.

As a photographer, the MacBook Pro display may be the feature that makes me a raving fan of the 2016 MacBook Pro, the hassles of port compatibility being a more than acceptable tradeoff.

The #1 disappointment with the late 2016 Apple MacBook Pro is its 16GB memory limit, which inherently places a performance limitation on professional usage. While it won’t affect most users most of the time, a 32GB option would have put me way over the threshold of declaring it as close to perfection as is possible in a laptop today.

I’ll have a full review once the new MacBook Pro arrives.

OWC Teardown of 2016 MacBook Pro: SSD is Removable in the 13-inch non-touchbar model

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Update 18 Nov 2016: the touchbar models have soldered-on SSDs.

OWC has a teardown blog post and video of the late 2016 Apple 13" MacBook Pro.

  • Solid State Drive module is removable
  • SSD – Using NVMe driver and an Apple designed controller. (See benchmarks below).
  • SSD had very strong tape covering the interface port
  • Memory soldered on — no upgrade. Uses DDR3 in 13" (no touch bar) vs DDR4 in the touch bar models.
  • Bottom was more difficult to remove than previous generations, but it was not glued
  • Speaker module needs to be removed to pull SSD back
  • Laptop automatically turns on when you open it regardless of pressing power button
  • CPU – Intel 6th gen, Skylake i5-6360U
  • Keyboard – Keys seem to have a bit more throw then the MacBook.

2016 MacBook Pro: Compatibility Hardware (USB, Thunderbolt, Camera Card Readers, etc)

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

Adapters needed (minimum) for Lloyd

Update: see 2016 MacBook Pro: Arrived, Testing to Begin Soon, Solving the Adapter Mess.

...

The new (“late 2016”) Apple MacBook Pro touchbar models have four Thunderbolt 3/USB-C ports (2 ports for the 13" non-touchbar model).

OWC USB-C to USB adapter

These ports are incompatible with USB and Thunderbolt 2 without adapters, rendering any and all prior peripherals unusable without the necessary adapters (USB hard drives, Thunderbolt 2 devices, displays, card readers, etc).

Unlike past MacBook Pro models, no adapters are shipped with the $2300 - $4400 MacBook Pro. It’s disappointing given the premium pricing and the absolute need for these adapters (well, at least the USB-C to USB one).

Update: less than a week after this was written, Apple has dropped prices substantially on USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 adapters.

Shown my minimum cost ($160) just to adapt what I have to the late 2016 Apple MacBook Pro(and no card reader is included, that is still needed). The table that follows shows more options. The cost does not include a card reader, or any redundancy (in case of failure when traveling), or the need for more than one TB3 to TB2 adapter at times, so the real cost is closer to $300.

OWC has high quality USB-C to USB cables as well as regular USB and USB-C cables. This is the easy route to compatibility for USB devices.

The table below summarizes various options for using existing displays, card readers, Thunderbolt 2 devices, USB devices, etcetera on the late 2016 MacBook Pro.

However, the best overall solution for desktop users of the 2016 MacBook Pro (with AC power), is the OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock.

Challenge: Solution(s):
BEST all-in-one USB and Thunderbolt and SD card reader for desktop use with AC power availability OWC Thunderbolt 3 Dock offers 13 ports of various kinds

OWC confirms that the OWC USB-C Dock and OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock work with new Macbook Pro (TB2 Dock requires Apple TB3-to-TB2 adapter).
Read SD and SDXC camera cards SanDisk Extreme Pro SD UHS-II Card USB-C Reader TESTED DOES NOT WORK WITH MY LEXAR SDXC 256GB CARDS
Read Compact Flash camera cards: Adapt USB card reader via USB-C to USB adapter?
USB ports and SD cards Tripp Lite 4-Port USB-C to USB-A Portable Hub
Satechi Type-C USB 3.0 3 in 1 Combo Hub
Sanho HyperDrive USB Type-C 5-in-1 Hub with Pass Through Charging
Single USB3 port OWC USB Type-A to USB Type-C Adapter
  or
Apple USB-C to USB Adapter
The USB-C to USB Adapter lets you connect standard USB accessories — flash drives and cameras, for example — and iOS devices to any Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) port on your MacBook Pro.
Gigabit ethernet adapter Belkin Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter
Thunderbolt 2 adapter Apple Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter
Note: the Apple adapter is impressive in that it appears to be bi-directional, that is, TB2 or TB3 host to TB2 or TB3 peripheral.
The Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter lets you connect Thunderbolt and Thunderbolt 2 devices — a Thunderbolt display, for example — to any Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) port on your MacBook Pro.
Mini Display Port adapter
(presumably same as TB2 adapter)
Should work with the adapter above but unclear from description.
Firewire 800 Apple Thunderbolt to Firewire Adapter. But this doesn’t make a lot of sense since to use that, you have to also use an adapter to Thunderbolt (two adapters together). You’re much better off getting an OWC Thunderbolt Dock.

OWC confirms that the OWC USB-C Dock works with the 2016 MacBook Pro:

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC USB-C Dock ports

OWC confirms that the OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock works with the 2016 MacBook Pro; connect it using the Apple Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter.

OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock , rear ports
OWC Thunderbolty 2 Dock, rear ports

Not much in the box, which is what creates all these issues:

Stripped-down — no adapters supplied

New Apple MacBook Pro (updated with comments, updated again with solutions)

See my Mac wish list at B&H Photo and see all 2016 MacBook pro models at B&H Photo.
See all 15" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models or see all 13" Apple MacBook Pro 2016 models. MPG gets credit if you buy through those links.

The new MadBook Pro might be what it is called given the cost for this configuration.

But given Thunderbolt 3 and my need for it for testing all sorts of products plus my storage problems in the field with a 512GB flash drive, I’m not about to make the same mistake I did with my late 2013 MacBook Pro. So I maxed-out the SSD (flash drive) and went whole hog on the CPU and GPU. Still no 32GB option for Apple’s top-end laptop—that rankles. I may cancel my iPhone 7 Plus order, because I can’t afford to dump that much moolah into Apple (and I can live with the iPhone 6s Plus anyway).

I expect that B&H Photo will have the new Apple 2016 MacBook Pro available for pre-order soon (no sales tax outside of NY). Thanks for using that link to buy.

Continues below, with comments.

late 2016 Apple MacBook Pro top-end config
OWC USB-C to USB adapter

Genius design does not mean practical elegance

For additional and varied viewpoints, see this collection of quotes and links on the 2016 MacBook Pro.

Form over function brings with it some very inelegant challenges. These are not a big deal for desktop use, but I’m writing this sitting in my car in the mountains, and all this adapter stuff brings the risk of forgetting the adapters and the very limited working space in an already packed car.

  • No SD card slot. an external card reader is required in the field when photographing, I use the SD card slot every day multiple times. But to use the card readers I have, I have to use another dongle as well: a USB-C to USB dongle.
  • No direct compatibility with USB: an adapter to plug in a USB3 SSD I use for backups is also needed. And a USB-C to USB adapter for my iPhone and/or a Lightning to USB-C cable.
  • [desktop use] No gigabit ethernet port (this was true of prior model also)—so one more dongle. That’s not so bad, since it’s for desktop (not travel use), but it’s one more dangly dongle.
  • [desktop use] No direct support for Thunderbolt 2: users will need to purchase Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapters simply to use any existing peripherals or displays (Mini Display Port).
  • [desktop use] No direct display support: users will need to purchase Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapters simply to use any existing peripherals or displays (Mini Display Port).

For me, that's at least four (4) dongles, where only the ethernet adapter was needed with the 2013 MacBook Pro. I also use function keys, and fortunately those seem to be available via the Touch Bar:

Reader Glenn C reports that: “the touch bar can display traditional function keys. It does so automatically when an app has no need for special touch controls, when the "fn" key is pressed, or when in BootCamp. You can also choose to always show function keys via a preferences setting.”

The people at Apple no longer understand what is desirable in a high-end computer for professional users; a $2300 - $4500 MacBook Pro is not a starter laptop and no one needs such a high-end device for web and email—but professional users do. Apparently (as per media reports), Tim Cook thinks everyone should just use an iPad, that there is little need for any computer any more. Which captures the mind-set driving current designs. So I think he is out of touch with what traditional professionals want and need. His iPad view (“who needs a computer”) may be quite valid in a general sense, but then why build a MacBook Pro at all? Isn’t market differentiation sensible (a true high end computer offering)? Apple is a business, and if the decision is that professional users don’t count for much if anything (this is probably true in a revenue sense!), then the product lineup makes perfect sense. Apple will lose segments of the pro market, just as its iPhone business peaks. Maybe that is not a wise course. The computer market has stagnated, but not just because of iPad—the functionality of computers has stagnated when it ought to be expanding.

Apple’s Tim Cook, from the the Telegraph article:

“I think if you’re looking at a PC, why would you buy a PC anymore? No really, why would you buy one?”, asks Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive....

Is that clueless or what? Tim Cook is apparently so myopic that he cannot even conceptualize the needs of professionals like me. It speaks to a willful ignorance bordering on contempt for professional users, with years of evidence (specific actions by Apple) to support that idea. Not everyone is a dilettante consumer sitting around listening to music or watching movies or tapping a few emails or a few input taps—that’s the consumer crowd, albeit the large majority. But some of us produce content and/or get complex tasks done. We need to get serious work done for which the iPad is a bad joke—like suggesting moving the contents of your home to another state using a bicycle. This is not funny; it is an ignorant and insulting bad joke for those of us who need solid capable hardware.

When I receive this new MacBook Pro I will review it, then mull over returning it since my 2013 MacBook Pro still gets the job done very well. But perhaps the faster and larger SSD and a bit more performance and a wider gamut screen in the new model will be so impressive that they will win me over as compensation for the aggravation of carrying a bag 'o dongles along for basic functionality. Also, if it’s the only Thunderbolt 3 Mac coming for a while, I will be forced to keep it, for testing Thunderbolt 3 products that should be coming in early 2017.

I’d be a lot happier if Apple included *adapters in the box* for a $2200 to $4500 laptop the following: (a) SD card reader, (b) gigabit ethernet adapter, (c) Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter, (d) Mini DisplayPort adapter. OWC will deliver a USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 Dock similar to their existing OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock and OWC USB-C Dock, but those are strictly desktop products, not for on the road where there is no AC power.

Some users might be better off buying a discounted prior model top-end MacBook Pro (when the discounts pop up). On the other hand, this is progress—USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 are here to say, and are the future.

Solutions

See this compatibility page.

Adrian C writes:

I have no need for a lap top but I do have a need for a powerful upgradeable desktop. Sadly Apple seem to have lost all interest in their proffesional and advanced amateur users. If you fit into either of these categories then it is clear that there is now little option but to abandon Apple just as it has abandoned its loyal users.

I have been using Macs for over 30 years and I am sure there are people who have been using them even longer but I am now at the end of my tether with Apple. Every OS update is dumbed down, has core functionality removed and stupid user interface decisions taken. Most of Apple's software is increasingly unreliable and they will decide to abandon it on a whim - Aperture is a good example here.

I have invested a lot of money and effort into Apple products over the years but I am now seriously considering a move to the other side. I know Windows is far from perfect but at least I can buy a desktop PC which can be built to my requirements and will be upgradeable for years to come. I have an original Mac Pro sitting idle for the simple reason that Apple in its wisdom decided to equip it with hard wired 32-bit efi. Who on earth would sell a 64-bit capable machine that can only boot with 32-bits. Well done Apple, I think that was probably the start of your core rot.

Of course, if I do move to Window there will be little point in owning an iPad or an iPhone so that will be more sales they will lose.

MPG: the trend.

José S writes:

Don’t forget you also lose the function keys. As a software developer its a HUGE lose for me… It seems my 2011 MBP will be my last laptop. Next one will be a Surface Book almost for sure…

MPG: reader Glenn C reports tha: “the touch bar can display traditional function keys. It does so automatically when an app has no need for special touch controls, when the "fn" key is pressed, or when in BootCamp. You can also choose to always show function keys via a preferences setting.”

Jordi I writes:

I’m thinking like you about new MacBook Pro. Recently as soon I have readed some rumors about the new keyboard in MacBook Pro, new USB-C ports, I was to Apple Store to check the butterfly keyboard in the little MacBook, and WTF!!!... typing with this stuff is like pressing the iPhone home button... serveral misstyping inadvertised until I look to screen (I’m thinking about this professionals that need write a lot, journalism, screenwriter, writers, will be screwed with another adaptor to connect a real keyboard and carry with it).

Inmediatedly I made an economic effort and I have ordered a Macbook retina 15” top config. I don’t want to complicate my life and work with an amount of adaptors, when It easy that you need in some work to connect an USB stick, any RS-232 adaptor, some config switch, any card reader, update firmware on some Blackmagic devices, etc etc (This is my usual work).

And about thunderbolt 3... I like to know what device can use the 40 Gb/s that you can review out of a graphic card, because any HDD case barely top out the Thunderbolt 1 performance (Only +4 SSD). Maybe will be good to daisy chain, but screw this with Thunberbolt 1-2 devices that anybody can own.

Apple is lossing the perception that many people used their products to work not to play to be the most “cool”, I can undestand this approach to mobile phones, ipads... but with 4000 $ equipment. This is a part of that you name it rightly “Apple CoreRot” :)

I’m loosing in my work the feeling of blind faith to suggest to a customer a solution based on Macs and thinking in HP Z840 when performance is needed. In my work I have customers that have heavy requeriments in video editing, and when there are some high end NAS involved, there are too much problems with Mac performance, because SMB. Some appliances that have Avid project/media sharing do the trick with VFS modules in SAMBA, and you know how SMB performs between Mac and other platforms.

The problem is that Mac is still more pleasant to work in general than Windows, but every time that Apple releases any new release takes away a bit of the good that has... and is like any cut some part of a body every time... until it becomes nothing.

Every time I have readed some comments and posts of you about Apple CoreRot is like you can read my mind from several miles ago.

I’m following your forum from 2009. You’re doing a great job.

MPG: I guess I’m not the only one who feels bitchy about it.

Jared M writes:

Seeing the trajectory Apple seems to still be on, of continuing decrease in quality coinciding with continuing increase in pricing, at what point do we consider saying enough of this madness? Yes there is a feeling of permanence in "switching", and only Windows offers the same consumer applications that many of us want to use (which has it's own host of problems) but it seems like Apple wants to get out of the tools market. What is the other explanation? The only thing I can think of is the top execs are truly buffoons who don't understand how vital stable and powerful computers are to so many working professionals (I am a programmer myself).

The sad thing is it's so easy to envision an Apple that is not only producing great phones but still leading the way with world class workstations and pro software. They have the resources, but they are throwing it away on silly watches and failed car projects.

At the current rate I feel like a switch down the road will become inevitable for me, and that makes me sad.

MPG: it’s self-evident that Apple does not consider professional users a meaningful market segment. That does not make them buffoons, but it does generate tremendous ill will, even if from only a “small” market segment (small because Apple has made it so, IMO).

Glenn C writes:

I'm sure there are others with different designs, that one is just one that I had seen in person. I am excited to have a wider gamut when I am on the road.

I find it interesting that the NEW Microsoft SurfaceBook with Professional Base (not yet shipping) has the following ports: SD card, 2 USB 3, headphone jack, and mini-DisplayPort... just like a Macbook Pro 4 years ago. I use Windows 10 laptops almost every day, and the worst part of the experience remains terrible trackpad behavior... if MS fixes that with some of their new trackpad interface software, they might close the gap... but a long way to go.

The hysteria of "this is my last Mac, I am going to Windows" reminds me of when Apple dropped the floppy, the CD drive, etc. The grass always looks greener until you hop over the fence and wind up in the weeds.”

MPG: wider gamut in the new MBP is a big plus indeed. And maybe pushes me over the top on the new MBP in term of acceptance.

But as I write this, I am sitting in my car up in the mountains, 250 miles from home. With the new MBP, I will have to cart along a bag 'o adapters, and I had better not forget them or I won’t be able to process my images, or back them up. So I’ll probably have to buy two SD card readers, just in case I forget one and/or one fails (plus an adapter for a CF card reader). The additional cost involved amounts to several hundred dollars for all my needs.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

macOS Sierra 10.12.1: Data Loss + Breaking Backup Protocols is Now a Feature?

A reader sent me this disturbing post at 9to5mac.com:

Sierra’s storage management tools are a complete disaster

So Apple Core Rot now moves into data loss. Tim Cook and his cronies are running a software train wreck, which MPG first reported on in Apple Core Rot, back in early 2013, though the roots of the problem started before that. Upper level management at Apple consists of two clowns who think that software quality is improving.

If your data is moved into the cloud by iCloud Drive, it means that your local backups won’t be backing up your crucial data. Which means there is only one (1) copy of your files, eg. NO BACKUP at all. Just iCloud as the sole copy (presumably Apple backs up, but do you really trust Apple that much?) This science fair project must sound good to someone at Apple, but MPG advises not relying on any such features—ever. What happens when you cancel or lose your PW or your account is hacked or whatever? Or Apple screws up? Or you go on a trip, don’t have internet access (or it’s just unavailable when you need it), and you are missing critical files? Or just that $2000 cell phone data overage bill caused by Apple eating up gobs of bandwidth you didn’t know about? Or the account is for a relative who dies, you don’t have the iCloud password, and Apple refuses to hand over the data without a court order (or just deletes it because the account was not renewed)? This whole iCloud offload idea is the most ill-conceived software vomit yet from Apple. The OS gets more and more unreliable, but this is injury over insult.

Apple still can’t make iCloud work right in any area. Apple’s systems WILL be compromised at some point. Trusting your data to iCloud (or any cloud-based service) as a sole repository is a very, very bad idea.

Systems fail. Systems have bugs. Sh*t happens. More complexity is not an improvement. Keep it simple: local storage, multiple backups (Time Machine is borderline acceptable as one approach, but not by itself, since it has had serious bugs in the past and may have more in the future).

To another not so far off point a propos data storage: I dread the arrival of the new APFS file system. The core principle to be violated at your own risk: you cannot trust Apple software. I advise giving APFS at least a year to mature, that is, assuming Apple does not bugify the existing HFS Plus file system in the process of the APFS rollout.

...

I made the stupid decision to upgrade to macOS Sierra 10.12.1 while on a trip to the mountains (photography). I hesitated, but Ihad to sit and wait for other reasons, so I went ahead with the macOS Sierra 10.12.1 'upgrade'.

After upgrading to macOS 10.12.1., the Apple updater erased (removed) some top level symbolic links, making me think that my entire source code tree had been wiped out. After a stressful investigation, I found that fortunately, only the symlinks has been destroyed. But what gives Apple the right to destroy my files, anyway?

Below is how I have my iCloud preferences set up. I would completely disable it, except that attempting to do so obliterates my contacts (they do not work locally, a serious Apple bug), and I want the alternative email for a couple of reasons.

Apple iPhone 7 Caution Was Warranted: GSM-only model has Inferior LTE Performance

Get NewerTech NuGuard KX Case for iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus at MacSales.com.

About a month ago, I wrote several pieces on the iPhone 7:

Now it turns out that the Apple sales policy that I had called “anti customer” (Apple refusing to sell an unlocked carrier-free phone for the first 30 days) was indeed a lot more unfriendly than I ever suspected, for a completely different reason: poor LTE performance when signal strength is low.

Since I often am in areas of weak to unusable signal strength, the ability of a phone to function with a poor signal is a major issue for me (I ordered an iPhone 7 S Plus Jet Black, but it’s showing as mid-December delivery). I imagine that I am not alone.

Cellular insights reports that LTE performance with the Apple iPhone 7 GSM-only phone (Intel modem) degrades badly when signal strength is less than optimal. Emphasis added:

Both iPhone 7 Plus variants perform similarly in ideal conditions. At -96dBm the Intel variant needed to have Transport Block Size adjusted as BLER well exceeded the 2% threshold. At -105dBm the gap widened to 20%, and at -108dBm to a whopping 75%.

As a result of such a huge performance delta between the Intel and Qualcomm powered devices, we purchased another A1784 (AT&T) iPhone 7 Plus, in order to eliminate any possibility of a faulty device. The end result was virtually identical. We are hoping that this sudden dip in performance at a specific RSRP value will be further investigated by the engineering and hopefully resolved. At -121dBm, the Intel variant performed more in line with its Qualcomm counterpart. Overall, the average performance delta between the two is in the 30% range in favor of the Qualcomm variant.

In all tests, the iPhone 7 Plus with the Qualcomm modem had a significant performance edge over the iPhone 7 Plus with the Intel modem.

Band 4 is the most commonly deployed LTE spectrum band in North America

 

That’s a black eye for Intel and for Apple. While Apple has hardly Samsung'd people, it sure looks like Apple sold millions of people a bill of goods. There is absolutely no way I would accept this gross performance inferiority—I would demand an exchange. Perhaps a software fix is possible, but Apple foisted this problem on all buyers for the first 30 days by dint of Apple sales policies (no AT&T or T-Mobile customer had a choice in the matter), so holding Apple’s feet to the fire seems appropriate.

Bryan V writes:

I bought an iPhone 7 Plus GSM (T-Mobile) and received it the first week of October. I have experienced signal levels on AT&T that are worse than with an iPhone SE or 6 Plus. This morning I processed the iPhone 7 Plus return and will be picking up a SIM-free iPhone 7 today. I knew there was an issue but it was hard to quantify with anecdotal evidence. I'm glad a report confirms this. I'm also purchasing the Jet Black version based on your comments about better grip. Thank you.

MPG: well, Apple has hardly Samsung'd people but the actual evidence points to a massively inferior modem in the GSM-only phones.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

Deal: OWC Neptune 480GB SSD only $117.75

MacSales.com has the OWC Neptune 480GB 6G SSD on sale for only $117.75.

This is a SATA drive suitable for any external enclosure or laptop or older model Mac Pro that takes SATA SSDs. See Making an Old Dog of a Laptop Run Like a New One: Wow!.

See all OWC SSD upgrades.

Deal: OWC Neptune 480GB SSD only $117.75

New Macs Coming?

Dare we hope for a new Mac Pro with Thunderbolt 3?

The rumor mill is saying that Oct 27 is the date Apple announces new Macs. That is very likely to include a new MacBook Pro and siblings, and possibly a revised iMac 5K.

Personally I’m hoping for an iMac 6K which would be a ~24 megapixel display device. Of course an iMac 8K would be jaw dropping, and able to display almost in their entirety images from the vast majority of cameras on the market. But 8K is not likely, nor is 6K—yet.

And then there is the sad old 2013 Mac Pro. Mine is still going strong. But maybe Apple will just cancel it instead of releasing a new Mac Pro?

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

Potential Security Issue: Google Chrome Update Mechanism Broken, Erroneously Claims up to Date for Any/All Versions

Chrome has a serious version update bug.

Side-by-side machines claim that “Google Chrome is up to date”, but as shown below, three machines have radically different versions, all claimed “up to date”.

With all machines running macOS Sierra:

  • iMac 5K shows version 44.0.2403.157 (64-bit).
  • 2013 Mac Pro shows version 48.0.2564.116 (64-bit)
  • 2013 MacBook Pro shows version 54.0.2840.59 (64-bit), which is the latest version.

It is ironic that a “web browser built for... security” is so insecure that it cannot properly update itself.

Also, color management remains broken using Google Chrome 54.0.2840.59, as tested both on my Mac Pro and on my iMac 5K.

Google Chrome version bug: erroneously claims any/all versions are “up to date”
NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc!

Reader Question: can Siri be disabled on an iPhone?

Apple’s Siri is useless to me, having failed 100% of the time at the most basic task I try—and I’m just not interested in using it for any reason; it’s a solution in search of a problem for me, at least until it stops being a science fair project.

So how does one really disable Siri on an iPhone? Siri is turned off as shown below, but every day it harasses me with the Voice Control window at right. It seems I press the home button just 1/10 of a second too long or whatever.

I’ve tried “Siri, turn yourself off and go away”, but all Siri does is dial some number in Belarus or Pakistan.

 

 
Siri won’t shut up and go hide itself

Disabling Siri as per above ought to work, but reader Michael W writes with a possible solution: go to Settings => General => Restrictions and disable Siri & Dictation.

Except that it does not work—I just tried it, restrictions are in force as shown, and Siri still pops up when I press the home button a little too long. And it disables dictation too.

Apparently, Apple is so intent on marketing and foisting Siri on users that it cannot be turned off. While I realize that Siri users are out there, I am not one of them. I just want disable that what for me is crapware.

Well, que Siri, Siri.

 

Siri won’t shut up and go hide itself

 

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

iPhone 7 in Jet Black: MUCH Better Grip in the Hand + SIM-Free iPhone 7 Now Available

Apple is now selling SIM-free iPhone 7 models that work with any carrier. Background.

I had now desire for the Jet Black finish, but now it’s the only model I will consider—see discussion below.

iPhone 7 and 7 Plus available SIM-free for any carrier

Finish and grip

(!) Grippy or not, I drop my iPhone 6s Plus regularly; see NewerTech NuGuard KX Case for iPhone 7 / iPhone 7 Plus (saved my iPhone 6s Plus several times).

Reader Serko A had written me about a week ago stating that the iPhone 7 in Jet Black was “really grippy”. I did not really understand how this could be, so I visited an Apple retail store and compared the Jet Black model to all the other finishes.

Indeed, the iPhone 7 or 7 Plus in Jet Black has much more friction to the hand than the other finishes—rather counterintuitive given its ultra-shiny finish. I had not considered the Jet Black model, but I found the difference so compelling that this is the only finish I will consider now. Why? Because I think the risk of dropping the phone is greatly reduced versus the finish of other models.

The only problem is availability, which is terrible.

iPhone 7 Plus Availability as of 13 Oct 2016

John W writes:

I’ve had my iPhone 7 Plus, Jet Black, for some weeks now and solidly agree about the improved grip of this finish. I’m picky about grip security, as there are many times where I have exclusively one hand available, e.g. on a crowded metro bus. This is the first iPhone since the 3G that I’ve felt comfortable using without a case. No problems with scratches thus far, but I expect it will acquire some mild patina of wear over time.

MPG: aditional confirmation.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

macOS Sierra: Apple Mail Continues to Have Sever Performance Issues, plus crashes

Apple Mail in macOS Sierra:
pegs CPU for 30 seconds or so

See macOS Sierra: Severe Apple Mail Performance Problems; these issues remain a time-wasting headache every day, and have no solution other than waiting for the incompetents at Apple to issue an OS X update that fixes them. Hope for improvement is a foold’s game in MPG’s view, but not imposssible, so waiting until OS X 10.12.1 is my plan, since I’ve been traveling and will travel again soon, and switching mail clients is a Big Deal what with all the emails I have.

I’ve done all the suggested fixes in the above linked blog post, to no avail.

Apple Mail also crashes regularly, though not frequently.

Apple Mail in macOS Sierra: crashes not too often, but regularly

 

SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

Yahoo’s Bulk Surveillance of Every Account under Government Coercion

Security expert Bruce Schneier writes:

Other companies have been quick to deny that they did the same thing, but I generally don't believe those carefully worded statements about what they have and haven't done. We do know that the NSA uses bribery, coercion, threat, legal compulsion, and outright theft to get what they want. We just don't know which one they use in which case.

So Yahoo secretly built a custom software program to search all of its customers' incoming emails for specific information under government coercion. Marissa Mayer is not only incompetent as a CEO, but has no balls* but likes to play ball. Emphasis added:

Yahoo Inc last year secretly built a custom software program to search all of its customers' incoming emails for specific information provided by U.S. intelligence officials, according to people familiar with the matter.

The company complied with a classified U.S. government demand, scanning hundreds of millions of Yahoo Mail accounts at the behest of the National Security Agency or FBI, said three former employees and a fourth person apprised of the events.

Some surveillance experts said this represents the first case to surface of a U.S. Internet company agreeing to an intelligence agency's request by searching ALL arriving messages, as opposed to examining stored messages or scanning a small number of accounts in real time.

The idea that Yahoo alone engages in such practices is not credible. Any company served with a secret court order is not about to tell you what it is doing.

For now, Yahoo takes the hit, but other cases like this will almost certainly emerge. Electronic services are enablers of a monumentally powerful police state. Not just everything you do online, but out in the world (license plate readers, cameras on every street corner, cell phone tracking in real time, etc). The infrastructure is in place to blink a totalitarian state into existence overnight, given the right “emergency” decree. Meanwhile, people foolishly go about about posting every last detail of their lives and friends on Facebook and its ilk. See for example Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram surveillance tool was used to arrest Baltimore protestors.

I personally experienced government pressure about 24 years ago, when NSA personnel showed up asking for compression source code, with no court order. We complied, but I had deep reservations at the time about it. Also, how the heck would I know a fake NSA or FBI badge from a real one?

* Double entendre intended.

4TB Internal SSD
for 2013 Mac Pro
Free how-to videos and tools included, 3-year warranty

diglloydTools: Current version Works with macOS Sierra (no update needed)

diglloydTools

diglloydTools works fine with macOS Sierra—no known issues, and no update needed.

Note that there is also now a cross-platform Java-based version of IntegrityChecker included (works on Windows, Linux, NAS OS, any operating system with Java). The existing native IntegrityChecker remains; the Java-based version is included in addition.

Get diglloydTools and consider subscribing to my photographic publications also.

Some of the other capabilities in diglloydTools

Aside from testing hard drive or SSD or RAID performance and reliability with DiskTester, data integrity with IntegrityChecker is a must-have workflow tool for anyone with important data:

macOS Sierra: Crashes Viewing Folders with Images (while selecting them)

As if potential data loss due to absurdly incompetent reporting of folder sizes is not enough, the Finder cannot display images properly. But first, a scathing editorial—

Why keep reporting such things? Because every day I encounter bug after bug. Every day my work is degraded by rainbow beachballs and delays up to 30 seconds opening a single mail message. File open dialogs that are still sluggish and with usability bugs (two years and running on that fiasco).

These bugs and dozens more are signs of a company in decline—rushed processes driven by timeline, not by quality. You read it here first back in 2013—feel free to call MPG mistaken 3 to 5 years from now, when the fan will need some serious cleaning from what hit it. For it is not even on the radar of the acolytes that fawn over Apple even as the dumbing down of the visionary genius of Steve Jobs* is manifest, Tim Cook being cut of a different cloth entirely.

The trend towards software manure is still easily correctable, but only if competent adults with a sense of pride in their work and a sense of perfectionism are put in charge of iOS and macOS—for macOS is mediocre now, and iOS is a rehash of the genius of its debut with nothing groundbreaking since its initial debut. The stock market rightly has its concerns, Warren Buffet notwithstanding. Freight trains 3 miles long carrying taconite pellets take a very long time to grind to a halt.

Hypothetical: given the bugs in macOS, would you trust your life to an Apple Car? At present, Siri can’t even tell me what 2+2 is (“no match found”).

How does a company ship a new iOS to hundreds of millions of customers with a security flaw that makes password cracking 2500 times faster (since fixed, so kudos to Apple for acting quickly). But when it comes to security, the rigor of software unit tests and code reviews and security reviews should be at least 10X more stringent. MPG thinks this is the tip of the iceberg; it likely points to internal leadership breakdown at Apple, due at least in part intensepressure to ship on a fixed schedule each year. When a company has a user base approaching a billion, the level of responsibility must necessarily rise, particularly witih security.

* Apocryphal, but likely true: manager: “It is supposed to do X”. Steve Jobs: “Then why the **** doesn’t it do it?’

Finder crash for windows containing images

Select more than a few images and no joy. Dual displays, icon view with large icons (list view does not crash).

It is unclear whether the bug lies within the macOS Sierra Finder, or (much worse) within CoreFoundation. I am unable to open this window and select more than a few images without inciting a crash. Yet Photoshop handles the images without a hitch—nothing wrong with the images themselves.

The high-level executive in charge of software development has a history of dilettantism in approaching software quality (based on a detailed private report that I cannot print here from someone who used to work for him). The same overpaid incompetent executive claims that Apple software quality has improved in recent years. So is it any wonder that basic operations like viewing a folder containing images crashes repeatedly? This after a fresh reboot no less.

macOS Sierra is a turkey, not an eagle: Finder crashes displaying a few selected images

Jim S writes:

Considering the market Apple seems to be catering to, professionals are becoming “edge” users.

Never thought I’d see Apple sinking to this level and I have my doubts that things will change given their recent history :-(

MPG: Apple is a mass-market cell phone company, with computers playing a supporting role, one necessarily dumbed-down to support phones (but only one phone properly and well). But we can hope that competition will bring Apple back on course and restore quality goals.

John S writes:

I can’t reproduce this bug at in in Sierra… I can pick 1, 10, 100 , 500 ( I gave up after that) images (DNG files in my instance at about 15mb each) with no issues whatsoever. Finder displays them just fine.

Clearly your problem isn’t universal as I can’t reproduce it.

No issues with Mail either. In fact I’ve never had any issues with mail and everything opens up just about instantly whatever the message or how many (sometimes lots) of attachments it has.

Maybe it’s something peculiar about your setup.

There’s only really two apps I have serious issue with.. Chrome is far less stable than i’d like and I am now experimenting with Brave which seems pretty good and likely will be my default from now on… and there there’s Softraid. I know love this thing but IT has caused me some serious grief when I had it on Mavericks and also when I tried it again recently on Sierra (v5.5.5) I had to quickly remove it.
Having raid capability back in Sierra means I don’t really need it…

I do get ‘bugs’ at times but it’s almost alway due to some third party software and typically things that tinker with the finder / system a recent example is ‘smart scroll’ which I’ve had to remove as certain parts of it’s functionality, if enabled, did cause some Finder glitches. Removed it and all good now. Now if the OS and a third party app don’ t get on… who’s to blame? Don’t know I just fix it if I can and move on.

MPG: the statements here are fraught with logical errors.

Did he try dragging them to Photoshop? Were they Sony RX100 IV files? How was it done exactly (probably differently than me). Were there dual displays (El Capitan would crash with Time Machine with 2 displays, but not just one). And all kinds of other potentialities: bugs often depend on (a) how much memory and/or how many CPU cores and/or single or dual displays, (b) system context (what other apps), (c) the actual actions, (d) size of images in the window, and a thousand other factors. As proof that particulars matter, the Finder does *not* crash in list view, but only in icon view. It does not crash on my MacBook Pro, either. But my Mac Pro has 8 cores, the MBP only 4 cores. Maybe it's a multithreading bug—hard to say.

I could spend all day trying to track it down to something: do a clean install on multiple machines, create a new user account, etc: This is not my job nor do I have the time to waste and I have to real work to get done, so I just will work around the problem.

As for ad-ons: I’ve advised here at MPG for years to never install anything that is not absolutely essential for workflow, so I never use Finder add-ons, and never have. I run a “clean” system with only the minimal set of software needed for my work.

After all these years, and at a company that could fill a landfill with $100 bills for all the cash it has, software development ought to have a massive volume of software unit tests which forestall regressions by testing (proving) the fix for every bug ever found, as well as a rigorous system of new unit checks for all new functionality. That is the way a well-run software development organization ought to work. Given all the bugs in macOS Sierra and previous releases (many of them obvious), this is clearly not the practice at Apple. Heck, the breakage of critical features in iOS such as personal hot spot shows that such testing is not done properly. That sort of thing should not happen if proper unit tests are in place, and when there are also public beta releases, it is inexplicable how software can ship with such issues.

As for the Apple Mail comment: no mention of how many mail messages, mailboxes, type of mail server, etc. Generalized “works for me” statements with no context are of no validity. Bugs occur mostly with “edge” cases, the cases that sloppy developers do not test, hitting the 90% mark. This is the distinction between quality and pride in one’s work and professional competence, and sloppy engineering. In the medical field, 90% or even 98% would be grounds for losing one’s medical license. Given the hundreds of millions of Apple devices out there, I am not inclined to cut Apple any slack—nothing less than 7 sigma on bugs will do. Apple does not need to ship like clockwork every year; ship when the quality is proven out, not when a fixed date has arrived.

Franklin K writes:

After installing Sierra on my MBP 2010 SSD 8 Go, SSD, my display was similar to what you show.

I tried many things. No change.
I ran in contact with Apple in Cork where a friend of mine works.
He adviced me 2 points.
1- create a new user and check if the coloring of images occurs. The answer was no.
2- trash entireley ~/Library/Preferences

and restart the computer. No more trouble.

MPG: doctor, my arm hurts. Response: cut your arm off.

This falls into the “we have no idea, so reinstall the OS” category and similar variants. Or in software support terms: our buggy software sucks, so throw everything away and start over and you might get lucky. Reinstall the OS. If it happens again (it often does), repeat as necessary.

Creating another user is a diagnostic tool, but unacceptable as a solution for many reasons. Deleting the entire Preferences folder is data loss, requiring hours of hassle to fix every last checkbox in every app I use. It is not an acceptable solution.

Any app with preferences should validate them, and it should have software quality unit tests to validate all preferences. There is almost never a valid excuse for an app crashing because of “corrupted preferences”; it is just sloppy engineering and/or a lack of defensive coding, the same reasons that so many security holes exist for software hackers to exploit. Code reviews by fellow engineers (real code reviews not just token ones!) are also proper. I doubt that either is done properly at Apple given the strict “ship on a calendar schedule” versus “ship when proven to be rock solid”.

I wrote software professionally for 30 years. I know how to mimimize bugs by defensive coding, and how to write a wide variety of unit tests to prove that all the “edge cases” work properly. Clearly Apple has not disccovered modern software quality practices. given the delivery of so many new bugs and breakage of old working code with every new software release.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

macOS Sierra: Possible Data Loss Scenario

When I see a folder with zero (0) bytes, I have a tendency to hit cmd-delete to put it into the trash, and then cmd-shift-delete to empty the trash. A habit I must now unlearn, or possibly suffer data loss.

After 5 minutes or so, the Finder finally updated the folder size. If I am to guess, I’d say the same ge turning everything into a Spotlight search (as in Apple Mail and the File Open/Save dialogs) are responsible for this dangerous new behavior.

When will this rampant Apple incompetence, Apple Core Rot, end? The trend is only worse, never better. I have yet to see bugs introduced up to two years ago addressed. New bugs just keep piling onto the manure pile.

macOS Sierra, Finder: ~33GB folder shown as zero bytes
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

macOS Sierra: Cannot Copy/Paste Properly

I’ve seen this new bug now in at least two places:

  1. Copy something, even plain text.
  2. Paste it somewhere.

PROBLEM: what’s pasted is some old material, not what was copied. The problem seems to be only when Apple software is involved (Spotlight and Apple Mail so far).

Today, I saw the same problem trying to copy plain text again, but from another app. I also have seen the bug in Apple Mail trying to copy/paste between windows.

Shown below is the problem in one case; I copied a simple plain-text filename so as to paste it into Spotlight search (cmd-space). Instead, what is pasted is some file name or some such that I don’t think I ever even copied.

Spotlight search (cmd-space) cannot Paste the clipboard properly!

Shame on Apple: it takes severe coding and quality assurance incompetence to ship a new OS that cannot even copy and paste properly, a feature present since day zero of the Mac.

Is it any wonder that a macOS 10.12.1 beta was out within days of Apple shipping its ship-by-calendar-not-quality dreck to customers? Keeps things on the release scheduled and to heck with the bugs seems to be the modus operandi: that iPhone has to ship, so macOS Sierra has to ship, regardless of readiness. This isn’t just incompetence, it shows a fundamental disrespect for customers.

Don H writes:

Without digging too deep, I seem to recall that a new feature in the latest *OS is some form of ‘coherent’ copy/paste across devices (probably involves a cloud somewhere). That might be the root of what you’re seeing.

MPG: that must be it, although I turn off as much Cloud crap as I can, after years of disappointments. There does not seem to be any other reasonable explanation for breaking a core feature that has existed for decades.

Consider also the destruction of Apple Disk Utility in El Crapitan leaving users twisting in the wind, the destruction of Apple Mail in macOS Sierra and the grossly degraded performance of the File Open dialog in OS X Yosemite, just for starters. These things are NOT a coincidence: it’s Apple Core Rot, which I detected well before I first wrote about it in early 2013.

Jim G writes:

This is just another example of why it is not unreasonable to think that Macs are no longer the priority they once were at Apple. The updates are further and further apart and the software just keeps getting buggier.

Wonder how much Steve is rolling over...

MPG: absolutely. As a longtime Apple customer, I now view all Apple products with cynicism, a far cry from the day decades in which I was an enthusiastic fan.

iOS 10 Supports Color Spaces

Color gamut is going mainstream!

What does this mean for an average web use? More accurate color, more vibrant color, and particularly deep rich reds (think strawberries, bright red fabrics, sunsets, etc).

Far better color from an iPhone on a wide gamut display, the late 2015 iMac 5K, or any iPhone 7 model or presumably future iPad models.

But also on many printers that can print far wider range of color than any picture a previous iPhone could generate using the “sRGB” color space (laughably called “sad RGB”).

That’s because finally after years Apple now supports wide gamut color or simply “wide color”, via supporting the (moderately wide) DCI-P3 color space.

My workhorse display, the NEC PA302W, still has the best gamut and neutral grayscale out there.

For more, see iOS 10 Supports Color Spaces at diglloyd.com.

Brook Trout - Salvelinus fontinalis
__METADATA__
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

Half a BILLION User Accounts Compromised

Side note: I’ve never like Facebook (in part because it is a system that a police state must adore) and in part because Facebook pages are invariably visual garbage heaps. But I’ve also wondered how they can make so much money charging for difficult to document ad-to-finished-sales and amorphous benefits. Well, it helps to greatly overestimate usage.

..

The yahoos as Yahoo have compromised at least 500 million (half a BILLION) user accounts by poor security, allegedly by a state-sponsored actor; potentially the biggest data breach on record.

Of course Yahoo is “not to blame”, since it was done by hackers, possibly from a foreign state. Right? WRONG.

Yahoo stored unenencrypted user data, including all sorts of personal data that should be stored encrypted, but was not—gross security incompetence to maintain a dossier on every user. According to the Wall Street Journal:

The internet company, which has agreed to sell its core business to Verizon Communications Inc., said Thursday that hackers penetrated its network in late 2014 and stole personal data on more than 500 million users. The stolen data included names, email addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and encrypted passwords, Yahoo said.

Yahoo said it believes that the hackers are no longer in its corporate network. The company said it didn't believe that unprotected passwords, payment-card data or bank-account information had been affected.

...

Yahoo said the stolen passwords were encrypted, but computer-security experts said a determined attacker could unscramble passwords—especially simple passwords—using commonly available “cracking” software. Once cracked, hackers could break into Yahoo accounts and—if the password happened to be reused on another web service—possibly other websites too.

MPG: “believes”? Is that faith-based and/or some evasive statement. Many people re-use the same password for many things, so “possibly other websites” is a huge risk.

When a name, date of birth, telephone number are stored unencrypted, that’s a very nice start to identity theft—core information all handy. Moreover, even the encrypted passwords were apparently done wrong, because using the same 'salt' and other factors can make password cracking far more difficult.

How about a $100 fine per user, plus unlimited liability for anyone who suffers identity theft as a result? Seems fair. This kind of flagrant security incompetence is unacceptable. Hackers break in, and always will. So even mildy sensitive data should never be stored unencrypted and should be compartmentalized (name and email are public and not worrisome, but if a dossier on a user is stored, those too should be encrypted to avoid having a nice complete record).

Password security

Which brings me to password security: get 1Password and use it religiously. NEVER re-use the same password for more than one purpose.

James G writes:

Yahoo apparently is run by utter morons. Maybe that's where Apple has been recruiting programmers of late. That none of this stuff was encrypted (or encrypted with a Captain Crunch secret decoder ring) is just unbelievable. And that it happened two years ago and we are just now hearing about it is even worse.

Bruce Schneier has not weighed in on this yet, but if the breach was done by "state actors" i.e. China or Russia then this enormous data trove has very serious implications for US national security. Imagine having access to a database that has personal information in the private accounts of tens of thousands of security-cleared NSA and CIA operatives, aerospace engineers, software and hardware engineers, employees of power plants and pipelines, and on and on. It may take awhile but with data mining and cross checking against other databases a serious entity with time and money can assemble a detailed profile of pretty much anyone they want. And the same process could yield hits that they otherwise would never have expected. It makes it all that much harder for the US to infiltrate those "state actors" and gives those state actors even more ability to phish and F&%$#K us all up.

I never had a Yahoo account as I found everything that company did to be complete drivel. But my advice to friends has been to go in to your account, change your password and then delete everything and never use it again.

MPG: It makes perfect sense that Apple hired yahoos for the destruction of Apple Mail. Humor aside, I also never had a Yahoo account because Yahoo was and is the biggest turd of an internet destination that I was aware of. The security implications are indeed immense.

A Question for Readers: How to Print iPhone Photos

Here’s something that points out just how complicated computers and iPhones have made simple tasks—because I don’t know how to do it, not as described here.

An older friend of mine has used a compact point & shoot camera for years. His method of getting 4X6 prints is simple:

  1. Pull SD card from camera
  2. Hand SD card to camera store.
  3. Pick up prints later.

When I suggested using the iPhone 7 Plus as his sole camera (its image quality is better than his old P&S), the question immediately arose: how to make prints?

This is brilliant intelligent older gentleman, a true master at the top of his own field. But in terms of macOS or iOS competence, any 10 year old is far more advanced, and he is just not going to pick up the knowledge on macOS or iOS that we all take for granted, knowledge that seems trivial to us, but really is quite complicated. Heck, just doing a system update and updating apps or setting up a printer takes core knowledge that cannot be taken for granted. And Apple has failed miserably on iOS and macOS to make it easy, because it presumes a core competency on the part of novice users. [He has mastered messages on the iPhone, but that requires little training and few steps; email still flummoxes him].

So he wants a solution as simple as the above for printing iPhone photos. Maybe there is one, maybe a home printer that will never jam might work for direct prints from the iPhone (but then there is the tedious work of deleting them, just one more step). Or maybe there is a download/upload solution. But even getting the photos into the Photos app is a relatively complicated step, let alone mastering whatever process of selecting and uploading.

Get it? Nothing beats the trivial simplicity of pulling a small card out and just having it done. I’m stumped in finding anything that easy.

Suggestions welcome. But remember, what core knowledge and competency is required cannot be assumed. Review the steps above.

Airprint

A number of users have suggested an AirPrint capable printer (I had thought of that, but I need to see it work for myself). But when I go into the Camera app or Photos app on the iPhone, I can’t find any print option. See the step-by-step list above: this is the whole point: a few steps is a few too many for some people (and me).

Charles E writes:

My Dad is like that, he’s 90 and has trouble even dialing his iPhone. I have done one-on-one training since the early 1980s. A good trainer knows the majority of the task is assessing the student and assigning tasks to their skill level.

The Print option is at the bottom of every photo in Photos.app. You look at the photo and tap the little square with the arrow going up. It’s at the bottom left. Yes, it’s not obvious that Print would be under Share. Yes, that is the #1 problem with the iOS interface, tasks are sometimes not easily discoverable. Someone has to tell you where it is.

MPG: looks like I need to test an AirPrint printer to see just how well it works.

The print choice is HIDDEN on my iPhone until (a) unless I swipe right and (b) that’s after I touch the Share icon. Two steps just to *see* the Print option. So minimum three steps to print. Still, that's acceptable and so I’ll have to get an AirPrint printer and see how it actually works (there are lots of printer deals at B&H Photo). Something like the Canon Selphy might be appropriate.

Kiso writes:

I know what you mean, for my aging parents the easiest is to use an app like Shutterfly or Smugmug which will ask to access the 'photos on the phone. Simply select the photos they want to upload/order and check out of the shopping cart from the app. A few days later the photos will arrive via mail. They also have the benefit of viewing their photos on their grandkids on their phone at any time.

You can print if select a photo, hit the ‘share’ icon and since i have an AirPrint printer there’s the print button in middle. However, i’d recommend a service over fiddling with inkjets.

I have seen 3rd party lightning to SD card readers/writers, but have no experience using them. The Apple branded lighting to SD card was 1-way only, a SD card reader not a writer.

MPG: Good ideas (Shutterly, etc), so long as its simple, and it looks reasonably so.

The Sandisk iXpand Flash Drive with Lightning connector might be an option, but I’m not sure how complicated the transfer is.

Greg J writes:

It’s actually really simple. The kiosks have built in cables for the iPhone. Once the phone is connect, the machines display all the photos on the device.
The user can select which photos to print using the touch screen. In many locations, the photos are ready within an hour. Many stores now allow the photos to be uploaded via mobile apps and picked up later making the process more convenient.

Most Walmarts now have these kiosks too. Lightning cables are provided at the kiosk. I know some of the Kiosks allow you to load only some of the images, ex. first 100, 200, or ALL.

It’s probably the easiest way to print from a camera phone. The kiosks are not meant for professional photographers who want to edit RAW images.

MPG: this might be a good solution.

OWC ThunderBay 4 20TB RAID-5 $1299!
4TB to 40TB, configure single drives or as RAID-5, RAID-0, RAID-10.
Now up to a whopping 40 Terabytes

macOS Sierra: Compatibility Issues

The arrival of macOS Sierra is not problem free—some apps have issues and some serious.

This list is just a brief “for example”; presumably there are far more issues given the numerous apps out there.

As usual MPG recommends WAITING AT LEAST 3-4 weeks for working professionals to make a major OS upgrade, with 3-4 months advised for production shops, testing the waters with just one machine to start. Those with “special needs” like a dedicated Mac for printing to large format should probably never upgrade the OS once a machine dedicated to that task is operating well—keep such Macs as “toasters”.

Broken software

  • Apple Mail: performance is so slow that MPG may be forced to seek out an alternative mail program. One reader suggests Airmail.
  • Fujitsu SnapScan has numerous problems.
  • Google Chrome (latest version as of 21 Sept) hangs frequently when quitting and sometimes crashes.
  • Dragging files to applications in the Dock sometimes goes DEAD—no response, the file cannot be dropped on the app to open it. I’ve never seen this bug before, but it’s terribly annoying.
  • Good 'ol Copy and Paste are BROKEN, at least with Spotlight (cmd-space invocation). Many, many times, I copy something to the clipboard, and Paste pastes something copied from some previous action into the Spotlight search. It is really frustrating when this starts happening. How Apple can break something this fundamental is mind boggling.
    Spotlight search (cmd-space) cannot Paste the clipboard properly!

Drawing problems

  • RawDigger has a minor drawing problem in its histogram. The developer says it will be fixed soon.
  • Adobe DreamWeaver has problems in its File Open dialog, as shown.
    Drawing problems in File Open dialog in macOS Sierra (Adobe DreamWeaver)

macOS Sierra: Severe Apple Mail Performance Problems

Apple Mail in macOS Sierra:
pegs CPU for 30 seconds or so

New Apple Core Rot, and in a key area of functionality, at least for MPG.

Apple Mail in macOS Sierra has severe performance issues (and continuing bugs), just as in El Capitan and Yosemite. But is is far worse now, which speaks to the continuing incompetence by the programmers working on Apple Mail. Performance was notably degraded with the arrival of El Capitan; it seems that Apple is trying to engineer in bad performance. I think it is related to badly done search algorithms, similar to the performance losses in save and open dialogs. Continuing Apple Core Rot.

Clicking on my Sent mailbox (and others) results in delays of up to 30 seconds in showing the mailbox, along with multiple rainbow beach balls. The system has had ample time to do whatever it is it does after a system upgrade. Then trying to open one message may take another 20 seconds. Apple mail pins a CPU or more during this time.

The mailboxes have thousands of messages... a trivial task for software to manage if designed competently. If the issues are indeed related to the number of emails, then one half-assed and unpalatable solution may be to archive older mails.

The behaviors are so troublesome that MPG may be forced to abandon Apple Mail and to seek out an alternative mail program. One reader suggests Airmail.

Other mail problems:

  • As usual, Apple requires non-reversible “updating” of stored mail. A not so nice move by Apple (every release!), since there is no going back.
  • Certain Apple Mail preferences get whacked, including ones useful for security, so re-check mail preferences. This Apple Mail behavior violates good mail hygiene in a security sense (e.g. enabling loading of remote content in messages, removal of the display of custom mail headers, etc).
  • The password for certain types of mail accounts get removed, and they must be re-done (this happened in El Capitan also).
  • VIP senders remain 100% broken (non functional), just as in El Capitan.
  • Unread mail icon shows 8 unread messages, but there is only one shown.
  • Apple Mail beeps sporadically for no apparent reason.
  • Switching between mailboxes can take 30 seconds.
  • Messages can take 10-30 seconds to draw (blank message window). These are messages on the local SSD, not remote messages (nothing to download).
  • Frequent rainbow beachball hangs, often for several seconds.
  • Half-second delays after deleting an email.
  • Search is almost unusable even for the simplest one: multi-second delays.
  • Half-second to a second or longer pauses while typing a short email.
  • Many more sluggish performance problems.
  • Unable to copy and paste with some types of content that I have done many times before. This is an all-new bug. Repeatable, even after quitting and restarting mail.

Apple Mail is a nearly unusable disaster in macOS Sierra aka clusterf**k. Perhaps it works fine with iCloud or diddling around with a few dozen messages, but it is too slow to be usable; everything I do is subject to multi-second delays. Just about everything in macOS Apple Mail involving selection or search or delete or so on has multi-second delays and pins a full CPU core at 100% during that time. Searches and/or examining my Sent mailbox can take up to 30 seconds to respond. This is not a one-off issue, but a constant problem. Never before has Apple broken Apple Mail this badly; It looks like I am going to have to abandon Apple Mail.

The sheer wanton incompetence necessary to code, let alone ship this excrement to customers is mind boggling.

The good news (should I have to switch), that Spam Sieve (which I consider essential) supports many mail clients. The bad news is there might not be any rock solid email clients to switch to, see comments below.

Apple Mail in macOS Sierra: frequent rainbow beachballs while pegging a CPU core

Possible improvement, suggestion by Arne E

Mail does seem to become laggy on its own after a certain time, and until now rebuilding the Mail index has always helped. It doesn't become OS9-snappy, but at least I don't have to wait 10 or 30 seconds for a message to appear. Don't know if this solution works in Sierra, but you should test it.

The vacuum command will rebuild the email database, not the mailboxes (see below). Makes me feel like I’m running Windoze or something, that is, having to crap like this that ought never need to be done by any end user.

  1. Quit Mail
  2. In Terminl, paste this command and hit return:
          /usr/bin/sqlite3 "$HOME/Library/Mail/V4/MailData/Envelope Index" vacuum
  3. Restart mail.

I’ve tried this. Still getting spinning beachballs, but it may be more responsive. TBD.

Daniel M writes:

That’s why I moved to Outlook for Mac since early this year. I can’t stand the poor performance of Apple Mail. I have an IMAP professional email hosting, and an Exchange Online Office 365 and both have a custom domain. Apple mail handles both accounts very poorly especially the exchange account. It doesn’t matter if the mailbox and folders contain tens of thousands of messages because if it is done correctly the system can handle this task very easily. I also encountering slowing down when loading folders, and at the same time, the unread counts are very unreliable.

Surprisingly, Outlook performs really well. It is fast responsive and handles various types of accounts very well.

MPG: I run my own mail server also, but it is POP3. One reader suggests Airmail as the client, see below.

Mark E writes:

I’m surprised you are still using Apple Mail. Maybe you could go into what features keep you in Apple Mail. It did get a lot better a few years ago, but then stagnated.

It seems obvious that the new Apple won’t put any serious development resources to freebie apps. If it sends and receives email, it’s good to go. It wouldn’t surprise me to hear that Dev did the testing as well. :^}

I’m using Airmail and find it extremely robust.

MPG: looks I may have to move to something like Airmail.

Martin D writes:

The mail situation just keeps getting worse and worse and I don’t know what to do.

I’ve tried AirMail. It has lots of problems, too… different problems.

It’s as if there’s a global conspiracy to bury email unusable.

MPG: (I know Martin and trust his feedback)—I don’t know if I can tolerate AppleMail much longer, but if AirMail has issues I’m hosed.

Mike C writes:

I read your post regarding Apple Mail bugs and potential third-party mail apps. I've been using MailMate on Snow Leopard for several years and am mostly happy with it. As a default, it blocks external content links in messages, and the user has the option to load the content or not upon opening the message.

The developer is one guy against the giants; I think he's doing a pretty good job.

MPG: another potential replacement candidate for Apple Snail Mail. It’s useless to me however, because it is an IMAP client only, not POP3.

Which Camera System / Lenses Should I Get?
✓ Get the best system for your needs the first time: diglloyd photographic consulting.

macOS Sierra: Stable Release

UPDATE: MPG now recommends waiting six (6) months to go to macOS Sierra. Key functionality has been destroyed, like Apple Mail and Copy/Paste. And some of it might not be fixed any time soon. And bottom line is that there is ZERO benefit to macOS Sierra.

MPG is contemplating downgrading back to El Crapitan, but this is difficult because at the least, AppleMail destroys (updates) mailboxes to some new format that is irreversible.

...

Unlike the past 3 or 4 releases, macOS Sierra is probably safe to go ahead with right away. Finally, relief from the Apple quality failure onslaught.

The macOS Sierra install has been running on the late 2015 iMac 5K and 2013 MacBook Pro Retina with no issues for 12 days now. Today I installed on the 2013 Mac Pro, based on stable results with those two machines.

There are at least some compatiblity issues with macOS Sierra; as usual MPG recommends WAITING AT LEAST 3-4 weeks for working professionals to make a major OS upgrade, with 3-4 months advised for production shops, testing the waters with just one machine to start. Those with “special needs” like printing should probably never upgrade the OS once a machine dedicated to that task is operating wel.

  • There was an install glitch and it happened on BOTH the late 2015 iMac 5K and 2013 Mac Pro: the install hangs with a dark screen, and the computer has to be forcibly powered off. Installation resumes after powering on and is was successful after that one glitch.
  • The usual issues crop up: Apple removes certain software such as the version of Java required for Adobe DreamWeaver to work, which requires reinstalling the legacy Java package.
  • diglloydTools works fine, with no obvious issues.
  • My daily tools including Photoshop, DreamWeaver, TextWrangler, RawDigger, Safari and so on, and all seem to be OK. Exception: Adobe software update window has drawing problems on one computer, and so does RawDigger. So there are some glitches.
  • Apple Mail has severe performance problems and other bugs.
Eastern Sierra Nevada
__METADATA__
OWC Thunderbolt 2 Dock
Review of Thunderbolt 2 Dock

OWC Drive Dock Now Available in USB 3.1 Gen 1 for about $75

Get OWC Drive Dock at MacSales.com.

OWC Drive Dock

Back in late 2015 MPG reviewed the OWC Drive Dock. That version of the OWC Drive Dock offers both Thunderbolt and USB 3.1 gen 1 connectivity. But because of the high cost of Thunderbolt-based peripherals, its about $240 price tended to make it more of a product for professionals.

OWC has now released the OWC Drive Dock USB 3.1 gen 1 model for about $75. MPG has not yet tested the USB 3.1 gen 1 version, but performance should be identical when using the USB port (that is, almost as fast as the Thunderbolt port).

  • Two drive bays each accommodate 2.5 or 3.5-inch SATA drives
  • USB 3.1 Gen 1 port
  • Read up to 434 MB/s, write up to 406 MB/s
  • Supports drives up to 10TB or greater
  • Mac & PC compatible
  • Each bay features an independent power switch and LED activity indicator
  • Universal auto-switching internal power supply
  • Professional aluminum enclosure
  • Two year OWC Limited Warranty including award-winning technical support
  • Includes 24-inch (.6m) USB 3.1 Gen 1 cable

The OWC Drive dock accepts either 3.5" or 2.5" drives—SSD or hard drives in either size. Bare hard drives and fast high-quality bare SSDs are the least expensive way to expand storage, since there is no enclosure (case) or power supply or cabling involved. With the OWC Drive Dock, just insert the bare drive and go.

OWC Drive Dock: Thunderbolt + USB3 Connectivity Using Dual Bare Hard Drives or SSDs

The OWC Drive Dock is an excellent solution for anyone needing to work with bare hard drives or SSDs for backup or similar. For example, videographers who need to download and backup SSDs in a single portable solution.

Bare hard drives and fast high-quality bare SSDs are the least expensive way to expand storage, since there is no enclosure (case) or power supply or cabling involved. With the OWC Drive Dock, just insert the bare drive and go, swapping drives as needed. For example, inserting two bare 6TB HGSG Desktar NAS hard drives into the OWC Drive Dock delivers 12TB of capacity at low cost. Swap more drives as needed.

OWC Drive Dock
OWC ThunderBay 4 20TB RAID-5 $1299!
4TB to 40TB, configure single drives or as RAID-5, RAID-0, RAID-10.
Now up to a whopping 40 Terabytes

iPhone 7: Apple will not sell unlocked iPhone with both GSM and CDMA, but maybe in a a few weeks

NewerTech NuGuard KX case for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus

Get NewerTech NuGuard KX Case for iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus at MacSales.com.

Update 13 October: SIM-free any-carrier iPhone 7 models can now be purchased.

MPG called Apple to try to buy an unlocked any-carrier phone (with both GSM and CDMA support) and was told that as of Sept 12, Apple does not offer an unlocked iPhone supporting both GSM and CDMA that is not tied to a carrier, but that it may be coming in a few weeks.

At present (12 September), Apple will only sell iPhones tied to a carrier (even unlocked ones!); see Apple iPhone 7: can an Unlocked Model Actually be Bought at Apple Store?. When I called, my attempt to purchase an unlocked Verizon model was refused because I am not an existing Verizon customer. Apple simply will not sell unlocked phones not tied to a carrier—not yet, but perhaps in a few weeks.

MPG doesn’t like or agree with this anti-customer approach, but there it is.

See Apple iPhone 7 Caution: GSM-only model lacks CDMA network support, precluding future use with Verizon or Sprint for why one might want to buy a iPhone 7 for Verizon when intending to use it with AT&T (for now).

Initial choice of iPhone 7 network may preclude use in the future on other networks
Apple iPhone 7 support for cell phone spectrum

 

Altitude on iPhone: ProAltimeter app

The barometric altimeter on iPhones is not exposed as a built-in app or other info feature, such as on the home page of the phone, so I didn’t realize that there is a barometric altimeter on the iPhone 6s Plus (and iPhone 6 and 7).

GPS elevation can be subject to errors of hundreds of feet or more, so I don’t like to use it. As shown below, the error is 28% as the actual altitude is 504 feet yet GPS says it is 358 feet—GPS can be much more in error in the mountains. Also, a good GPS signal may not be obtainable under tree cover or in a tight canyon. Finally, a barometric altimeter is an excellent cross-check.

When I hike, I often know the exact altitude at certain points, at least when I start a hike. So a barometric altimeter is a reliable way of tracking altitude, at least for some hours. And frequently I know the altitude of key points, such as lakes or summits, so exact recalibration is possible.

The Pro Altimeter app for iPhone can be calibrated from GPS automatically, or most critically, one can enter the known altitude. Perfect for my needs (manual entry) and the GPS altitude is a plus for when there is a good constellation of satellites, as shown below.

At fixed altitude, the barometer is useful for showing air pressure, which can hint at weather changes. Too bad the app doesn’t graph the pressure every 30 minutes or so. It has two choices of display as shown, one better for day and one better for night.

Update: I’ve used Pro Altimeter in the mountains now, and it is has one major bug: it doesn’t say when the GPS altitude was last obtained. So it will show an altitude a day or a week old, with no indication of current status. The only clue that the reading is wrong is the barometric reading. The app sometimes has to be left on for several minutes to get a GPS reading (and in canyon it might never get one), yet there is nothing that indicates that the GPS reading is hours or days old and completely utterly wrong.

 
Barometric pressure and altimeter: one inaccurate and one accurate reading, same location
ProAltimeter iPhone app for iPhone
ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

macOS Sierra: Uneventful Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina

I wrote about relatively trouble-free upgrading on a late 2015 iMac 5K a few days ago. Another in-place upgrade with the MacBook Pro Retina also went smoothly.

It has almost been a non-event: in comparison to previous OS releases the transition to macOS Sierra has been the most seamless update in years.

While issues could arise, MPG attributes this at least in part to a relatively minor upgrade that looks to be a major macOS upgrade as a marketing event only. Siri is just an app that could have been tacked on to macOS El Capitan and ditto for the new APFS file system support.

MacOS Sierra is thus a minor release, which is a godsend to users sick and tired of constant feature distruption and new bugs that have characterized previous macOS major releases. By disabling Siri on macOS Sierra, MPG can (gratefully) hardly tell any difference with OS X El Capitan.

Oneida Lake, Just Past May Lundy Mine
f/11 @ 1/125 sec, ISO 100; 2016-08-17 12:56:00
Sony A7R II + Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 Distagon

Startup Key combinations for Intel-Based Macs

A nice summary I found at Apple. I can’t remember all these myself

Press and hold the keys immediately after powering on, and keep holding down until the described behavior occurs. These combinations work with Intel-based Mac computers.

  • Shift ⇧ = start in Safe Mode.
  • Option ⌥ = start to Startup Manager (allows booting from any connected bootable volume).
  • C = start from a bootable CD, DVD, or USB thumb drive (such as OS X install media).
  • D = start to either Apple Hardware Test or Apple Diagnostics, depending on which Mac you're using.
  • Option-D = start to either Apple Hardware Test or Apple Diagnostics over the Internet.
  • N = start from a compatible NetBoot server.
  • Option-N = start from a NetBoot server using the default boot image.
  • Command (⌘)-R = start from OS X Recovery.
  • Command-Option-R = start from OS X Recovery over the Internet.
  • Command-Option-P-R = Reset NVRAM. Release the keys after you hear the startup sound again.
  • Command-S = Start up in single-user mode.
  • T = start in target disk mode.
  • X = start from an OS X startup volume when the Mac would otherwise start from a non-OS X startup volume.
    Command-V start in verbose mode.
  • Eject (⏏), F12, mouse button, or trackpad button = Eject removable media, such as an optical disc

See other general Mac keyboard shortcuts.

ThunderBay 4 - The Speed To Create. The Capacity To Dream.

What I Want in an iPhone: Dual Carrier Support Simultaneously

NewerTech NuGuard KX case for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus

Get NewerTech NuGuard KX Case for iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus at MacSales.com.

See Apple iPhone 7 Caution: GSM-only model lacks CDMA network support, precluding future use with Verizon or Sprint for background.

What I (Lloyd) really want in an iPhone is simultaneous dual-carrier support. Specifically:

  1. Internet connectivity (cell phone hot spot) on either or both phone networks simultaneously, ideally using bonding for increased bandwidth. Reason: I travel where cell phone coverage is spotty and often weak, a serious challenge for years now.
  2. Dual phone numbers live at the same time on the same cell phone: one AT&T and one Verizon. Reason: spotty coverage where I travel, but also to separate types of calls and callers.

Most of the hype and hooplah is about 4G and LTE and such. What I care about is real-world coverage, that is, any coverage in the areas I frequently travel in. Coverage maps, even the best, are phony baloney where I travel—useless.

This idea seems so obvious that I don’t know why business travelers don’t demand it. I already take dual iPhones with me when traveling, because I cannot risk the loss of connectivity.

Apple iPhone 7 support for cell phone spectrum
Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

Reader Question: diglloydTool IntegrityChecker to address “had an experience where a number of my RAW files were silently corrupted”

diglloydTools

Guy G writes:

I trust you are doing well and thankyou for continuing such a high quality website.

I am interested in purchasing the IntegrityChecker software. Although most folks feel that copying files for archiving purposes is trivial, I have had an experience where a number of my RAW files were silently corrupted - only could tell when opened in Lightroom. Luckily I had backups. I have been using ExacFile but it appears to be unsupported and for such software my main concern is about the quality of the software and ongoing support.

I am a PC user and have no intention as yet to delve into the world of the MacPro. So it is wonderful news that you have made your software tools available for those that use Windows!!

I am interested in purchasing the software over the longer term and was wondering what the best option would be? If I purchase download access for 5 years does that include upgrades to the software? Or should I be purchasing the download access for a month and then an upgrade option for the longer term?

MPG: IntegrityChecker (icj java version) runs on any computer that can run Java: macOS, Windows, Linux, etc.

The value of IntegrityChecker comes over time: once hashed, files can be checked on any drive, any OS, including DVDs and BluRay and other read-only devices. This is important for long-term storage, particularly for professionals with data having long-term value, like image files. IntegrityChecker (icj) can also find duplicate files.

The 5-year option offers a no fuss, and you can download any new version any time you like. It costs less in total, although the difference is modest amortized over 5 years.

It is my intention to expand the Java-based capabilities going forward, for cross-platform and long-term viability.

See also: diglloydTools IntegrityChecker Java Version: Finds Duplicates, Saved me 100GB!

Excellent Search Tool: HoudahSpot

HoudahSpot

HoudahSpot is a powerful file search tool for OS X. A trial version is available. Single-user, family license and site licenses are available.

I (Lloyd) use Spotlight a great deal via its cmd-space shortcut. But Spotlight has degenerated in various ways, including not being able to find file names at times, and finding wholly irrelevant things when all I want is source code. It is also a messy business to find specific things in Spotlight without jumping through hoops with qualifiers and such.

Enter HoudahSpot, which offers all sorts of features for searching, including default search settings (a big deal for me), templates for specific types of searches, and much more. Simple as it is, the dialog below works like a charm every time without the mess Spotlight generates for me with the same search. Here, I want to find source files with a certain name. Or, it might be a function name within those source files. By using HoudahSpot, all the other gunk is filtered out (binary files, jar files, log files, etc) simply by requiring files of type java (Spotlight does not do this correctly with name:.java as tedious experience shows).

So as simple as this example is, it already is a big deal for finding what I want. Summary as per the developer:

Find important documents, mail messages, photos, image files and more:

  • Start with a simple search
  • Refine it by adding and combining criteria
  • Search several folders at once. Exclude others
  • Add and sort by any of the hundreds of columns available
  • Preview files and text matches
  • Find files by name, text, content kind, file extension, author, recipient, pixel count, etc.
  • Combine criteria to quickly zero in on the files you need
  • Customize columns in the search results list
  • Filter the results to see only relevant files
  • Set up templates for recurring searches

HoudahSpot is a powerful file search tool. It uses the Spotlight index ‐ which comes preinstalled with OS X ‐ to get you to your files in no time.

HoudahSpot search window
Cycling