diglloyd Mac Performance Guide

Lloyd gets credit via these or any site ads/links... thank you!
Trusted computing vendor MacSales.com
B&H DAILY DEAL   B&H Deals by brand/category/discount
Wish lists: Sony | NIKON | ZEISS | Canon | Pentax K | Fujifilm | Leica M | Leica SL | Macs
Buy anything at Amazon.com
SSD Upgrade for MacBook Pro Retina
OWC WEEKENDER SPECIALS!
ends in 40 hours

Photoshop CS5 Cache Tile Size = Sharp Stick In The Eye

Last updated April 30, 2010 - Send Feedback
img
Use 1024K; don’t even think about using 128K!
Settings above worked well.

The Cache Tile Size setting is a sharp stick in the eye. Use it wrong, and you’ll be a hurtin’.

It’s startling that the recommended default setting yields hugely impaired performance. See the graph below.

Adobe’s online help says: “To quickly optimize these settings, click a preset...”. Nonsense. Might as well jab a sharp stick in your eye.

This is a careless design decision (or maybe an outright mistake) that will hurt many customers by wasting their time needlessly. Something else should be done, up to and including CS5 figuring it out automatically for any particular file (self analysis). But at the least, not offering a sharp stick.

The settings shown at right performed about as well as anything I tried, though there are so many combinations that it’s possible there’s a better set. For general use, I’d probably use a history of 100 or so, because I like history.

The graph below says it all— don’t even think about using 128K tiles with big files.

img
Time in seconds, lower is better

Help me help you !

Help support this free content? Thank you. For the latest, read my blog.

      
Get up to speed in photography.

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2008-2016 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.