↝ OWC / MacSales.com... ↜
↝ diglloyd Deal Finder... ↜
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
High capacity, high-performance fault-tolerant storage for photography and video.
Non-RAID or RAID-0/1/4/5/10.
Capacities up to 84 Terabytes!
2017 iMac Pro: Helicon Focus
Related: 2013 Mac Pro, 2017 iMac 5K, 2017 iMac Pro, 4K and 5K displays, computer display, focus stacking, Helicon Focus, iMac, iMac 5K, iMac Pro, Mac Pro, Macs, storage, Thunderbolt, Thunderbolt 3
The data on this page and others was painstakingly obtained, made possible by the support of OWC / MacSales.com and B&H Photo. Please order through our links via these companies and/or subscribe—thank you.
See the MPG recommendations for iMac Pro, backup, peripherals. Not sure which Mac to get or how to configure it? Consult with MPG.
Helicon Focus, version 7.0.0 Jan 15 build
The prior version did not scale at all (see results further below); this new version is awesome, scaling to 10 CPU cores as well as one can hope for with a real program, given the drop in clock speed of a 10-core CPU (Turbo Boost reduction) and the overhead of using all those cores.
This test is for the new improved “Method B”, which the developer says is slower but much better with difficult stacks. It uses 28 16-bit 45-megapixel images from the Nikon D850. See Nikon D850 'Focus Shift shooting' feature for Easy Focus Stacking.
One might hope for about 4X better performance (18 vs 4 cores), but the 2017 iMac 5K takes 2.3X longer, which is a huge gap. Kudos to the folks at Helicon for solid work on scalability.
* Photoshop runs scripted tasks without much optimization. It is not even able to run in the background without glitches, constantly forcing itself to the foreground, making it impossible to do anything else. Running a script in Photoshop essentially idles the machine for other uses while the job runs.
Results below with macOS 10.13.3 including the Apple Supplementary Update. See the results from more systems with macOS 10.12.2 further below.
The 2017 iMac 5K takes 88% longer than the iMac Pro 10-core or in reverse, the iMac Pro cuts the stacking time by 47%. The iMac Pro is visibly remarkably blazingly fast—fun to watch even, as the stacked image takes shape.
Helicon Focus, version 6
Version 6 did not scale across CPU. Also, ecause of a bug in command-line rendering the GUI was used, which is what most people would use anyway.
Helicon Focus behaves strangely on the iMac Pro, utilizing about half of its CPU time in system calls—this suggests poor scalability, perhaps by busy-waiting code.
As can be seen, the 2017 iMac 5K beats out both the 2013 Mac Pro and the iMac 10-core showing plainly that the value of more CPU cores depends heavily on the software.
Recommended Items for iMac Pro and iMac 5K
See the recommendations page for details on why these items are recommended.