SEARCH
diglloydTools™
Thank you for purchasing through links and ads on this site.
↝ OWC / MacSales.com... ↜
↝ diglloyd Deal Finder... ↜
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
↝ OWC / MacSales.com... ↜
↝ diglloyd Deal Finder... ↜
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB
OWC ThunderBay 6
High capacity, high-performance fault-tolerant storage for photography and video.
Non-RAID or RAID-0/1/4/5/10.
Capacities up to 84 Terabytes!
High capacity, high-performance fault-tolerant storage for photography and video.
Non-RAID or RAID-0/1/4/5/10.
Capacities up to 84 Terabytes!
Hard drives or SSD.
iMac 5K vs Mac Pro: Cinebench
Last updated 2014-11-04 - Send Feedback
Related: 2013 Mac Pro, 4K and 5K displays, computer display, iMac, iMac 5K, Mac Pro, Macs
Related: 2013 Mac Pro, 4K and 5K displays, computer display, iMac, iMac 5K, Mac Pro, Macs
iMac 5K 4.0 GHz, 32GB, 1TB SSD, AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4GB GDDR5 -versus-
2013 Mac Pro 3.3 GHz 8-core, 64GB, 1TB SSD, D700
The two machines tested here are the fastest possible models for this type of work (as of late 2014).
Cinebench R15 OpenGL
The 2013 Mac Pro with its dual D700 GPUs falls well short of the iMac.
Cinebench OpenGL (GPU performaence)
iMac 5K 4 GHz Radeon M295X vs 2013 Mac Pro 3.3 GHz 8-core D700
iMac 5K 4 GHz Radeon M295X vs 2013 Mac Pro 3.3 GHz 8-core D700
Cinebench R15 CPU
The 8 CPU cores of the 2013 Mac Pro are indeed much more capable than the faster but only 4 cores of the iMac 5K.
Cinebench CPU
iMac 5K 4 GHz Radeon M295X vs 2013 Mac Pro 3.3 GHz 8-core D700
iMac 5K 4 GHz Radeon M295X vs 2013 Mac Pro 3.3 GHz 8-core D700
Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!
