Thank you for purchasing through links and ads on this site.
diglloyd Deal Finder...
Buy other stuff at
Handpicked deals...
$3397 $2797
SAVE $600

$3397 $2797
SAVE $600

$1499 $1079
SAVE $420

$1499 $1079
SAVE $420

$3297 $2797
SAVE $500

$1999 $1199
SAVE $800

$3399 $2199
SAVE $1200

$400 $300
SAVE $100

$2998 $2498
SAVE $500

$2998 $2498
SAVE $500

Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB

Photoshop CS6 Performance — diglloydHuge

Last updated 2013-01-09 - Send Feedback
Related: hard drive, iMac, Macs, memory, Photoshop, SSD

The diglloydHuge benchmark requires that Photoshop have available about 56 GB of real memory for itself, which means that a machine with less than about 64GB of system memory will suffer in performance on this test due to the need for Photoshop to write and read from the scratch disk.

The results show clearly that having adequate memory is critical. With memory prices so low, it makes no sense to skimp on memory for a machine that approaches $2500, when 32GB memory is around $220 (as this was written). Even adding 16GB memory to a stock 8GB system would yield 24GB total, a massive jump over the base 8GB.

vs Mac Pro

The iMac is not competitive here. Its 32GB memory limit is the problem.

An iMac with a hard drive (without Fusion) would fare much worse than shown here; the Fusion setup is an all-SSD test here (hard drive not involved).

Even when combined with the fastest PCIe SSD available (Mercury Accelsior in Mercury Helios enclosure), the results are still notably slower than the Mac Pro with adequate memory.

Protect Your Phone
NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads.
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Plus, excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc.

vs MacBook Pro Retina

The MacBook Pro Retina suffers from too little memory (16GB). Even so, the iMac with 16GB easily outpaces it.

Fusion capacity usage

The Fusion drive performs well if and only if there is somewhat less than 120GB of capacity used. Once 120GB or more is used, the Fusion drive maintains ~4GB of free SSD space, and this drops its performance drastically.

Discussion continues below.

Photoshop CS6 performance on diglloydHuge benchmark
Late 2012 iMac 3.4 with GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2GB *
Fusion variants using only 37GB on system drive = pure SSD operation

More on Fusion

Curiosity was aroused when the Fusion drive performed so well here. With only 37GB on the Fusion drive (“Fusion 1TB < 120GB”), this meant that the test using Fusion was really only using the SSD only (no hard drive involved).

But what about real world usage? When a more realistic amount of data is stored on the Fusion volume (at least 120GB given that the Fusion SSD is 120GB), what would the performance be, given that the Fusion technology maintains 4GB of free SSD space, not the ~83GB free in the test above.

As expected, creating another 120GB on the Fusion drive “hit the wall” with performance dropping from ~350 MB/sec down to ~150MB/sec while the files were being written to disk.

After creating the file, the system was allowed to idle until the disk I/O activity went to zero, indicating that Fusion had reclaimed its 4GB of SSD working space. In the real world, having 4GB SSD space available might not be the case (consider saving a multi-gigabyte file, then continuing to work with operations that are hitting the disk). Ditto for any kind of program driven batch processing where no pauses are available.

Detailed results

Photoshop CS6 performance on diglloydHuge benchmark
Late 2012 iMac 3.4 with GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2GB *
Fusion variants using only 37GB on system drive = pure SSD operation

*OpenGL (GPU) was disabled in Photoshop CS6 13.0.3, because it slows things down by a few percent (a result seen repeatedly with many Macs). OpenGL can be helpful for more obscure Photoshop operations, but these are not tested here.

2019 iMac 5K or iMac Pro?

Consult with Lloyd today!

Backup, RAID, optimizing performance, workflow.

Fusion vs Accelsior PCIe SSD

The Apple Fusion drive had only 37GB used meaning that the Fusion figures are for a Fusion drive which does not use the hard drive portion at all. This is not realistic for real-world use.

The OWC Mercury Accelsior in a Mercury Helios enclosure shows a surprisingly small improvement over the Fusion option in spite of its ~70% faster raw performance. This might be more of a Photoshop limitation than anything else.
View all handpicked deals...

Nikon Z 7 Mirrorless Digital Camera (Body Only)
$3397 $2797
SAVE $600 | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__