All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: diglloyd.com photography and WindInMyFace.com

Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
Amazon
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Memory Upgrades for 2019 Mac Pro - Save Up to 65% vs Factory Costs
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$399 $199
SAVE $200

$2797 $2497
SAVE $300

$1398 $998
SAVE $400

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$549 $499
SAVE $50

$799 $549
SAVE $250

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$3899 $1499
SAVE $2400

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1398 $998
SAVE $400

$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$1399 $799
SAVE $600

$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

$1997 $1797
SAVE $200

$3399 $2699
SAVE $700

$400 $300
SAVE $100

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

Apple and Privacy: are there Bedrock Principles Based on Inviolable Philosophical/Moral Principles, or Rather, Concretized Pragmatic Range-of-the-Moment “whatever works” Policies?

Apple has generally done a good job on privacy for which I aplaud them.

But here in the USA, Apple has thwarted the FBI (a policy I don’t take a position on at this time), Tim Cook himself has harshly criticized our own President (here I invoke Tim Cook’s own words as relevant e.g., “regardless of your political views”) all while failing to criticize a far more serious violator of human rights—all for the sake of money.

I refere to the fact that Apple just turned iCloud in China over to the Chinese government, justified with the insipid bromide of respecting national laws of a repressive communist nation building the most Orwellian society ever seen on earth—breathtaking in scope—read up on it. A country that jails or kills people that get in the way. This is the infrastructure that Apple now supports.

How does one reconcile insipid bromides versus major corporate actions, and what does this tell us about integrity and principles versus corporate profit? I cannot reconcile this action with the claimed ethical principles of Apple.

The foregoing is jawdropping in the context of Apple’s outspoken social and political postures in the USA. Whatever one may think of the current USA federal policies, few if any US policies of can rival the coercive anti-individual-rights policies of the Chinese government. The Chinese people deserve better and while it’s not Apple’s role to fix the problem, it is also not its role to enable evil. And it certainly has a mandate to speak out against Chinese policies, or shut up here in the USA on social issues (Tim Cook seems to have ample time to express himself on trendy social issues here in the USA). Or issue a press release stating that corporate profit is the #1 priority, and everything else takes a back seat—that at least would show integrity and honesty. But to silently turn over iCloud to the Chinese government (well, a firm that is a proxy for it)—that is a major corporate action that deserves intense scrutiny.

I quote Tim Cook (emphasis added):

Regardless of your political views, we must all stand together on this one point — that we are all equal. As a company, through our actions, our products and our voice, we will always work to ensure that everyone is treated equally and with respect.

I believe Apple has led by example, and we’re going to keep doing that.

Taking this statement at face value, it seems that Apple’s new policy will be to support every killer regime in the world by accepting their policies, e.g. things like turning over iCloud over to any country regardless of whether individual rights are protected or ignored. The hypocrisy speaks volumes.


Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__