All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: photography and
Thank you for purchasing through links and ads on this site.
diglloyd Deal Finder...
Buy other stuff at
Get up to 16x more storage and 2x the speeds of the original drive
Handpicked deals...
$390 $270
SAVE $120

$1798 $1598
SAVE $200

$3297 $2797
SAVE $500

$3397 $2797
SAVE $600

$150 $90
SAVE $60

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$3698 $2998
SAVE $700

$2998 $2498
SAVE $500

$1799 $1299
SAVE $500

$1999 $1199
SAVE $800

$2299 $1599
SAVE $700

$2399 $2049
SAVE $350

$2799 $2399
SAVE $400

$2799 $1899
SAVE $900

$1199 $920
SAVE $279

$997 $897
SAVE $100

$2099 $1699
SAVE $400

$1999 $1349
SAVE $650

$1999 $1599
SAVE $400

$1999 $1999

$1329 $929
SAVE $400

$4499 $3999
SAVE $500

$329 $329

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$1499 $1289
SAVE $210

$2199 $1999
SAVE $200

$3399 $2199
SAVE $1200

4-Core CPUs are Easily Maxed-Out with a Few Simple Tasks

Recently I bought a 2017 iMac 5K for solid reasons and yesterday I discussed the switchover and the gear I’m using.

See yesterday’s 4-Core CPUs do not Leave Much Grunt for Other Tasks.

This post shows how high CPU loads max-out an iMac 5K and why 6/8/10 cores can be valuable even for non-video work. That is why I am generally reluctant to use a 4-core machine: my work often involves getting work done while other stuff happens, like clone backups and my local web server starting up and a Photoshop script running. There just isn’t much CPU power to go around. The cost is human time (my time)—getting things done, and since I usually work 12 hour a day 7 days a week (I’ve slowed down from 14-16 hour days 5 or 6 years ago), I care a lot about the Mac wasting my time.

The mitigating factor for the 2017 iMac 5K is that is a far faster CPU than what one can buy in the aging 2013 Mac Pro. Whether the new iMac Pro will suffer the slow-CPU fate of utilizing downclocked Intel Xeon chips is as yet unclear since Apple has not even said which CPUs are to be used.

The 2017 iMac 5K has four (4) real CPU cores and 4 virtual cores (hyperthreading), which is why there are 8 CPU history graphs (red/green stuff at left).

In my experience, virtually all tasks not only do not benefit from virtual cores, but can be slower, due to additional threading overhead. At any rate, 400% CPU usage total (add up all the usage) is full utilization.

The other point here is memory usage: CPU cores can run efficiently only when disk I/O is minimized. This is why I always go right to 64GB OWC memory for my work, and why Apple’s MacBook Pro line sucks—it is still stuck at a pathetic 16GB maximum memory, even though the chipset supports 32GB or more.

Below, an overloaded iMac 5K where the 'java' process is using 3.57 CPU cores versus just a heavily loaded iMac 5K. If I added cloning into this mix, the iMac 5K would be overloaded by a factor of 2X or so—8 CPU cores would be a lot better.

Apple ought to fix the Activity Monitor mess with CPU history for real cores only (what good will 36 graphs be for an 18 core CPU?)—that is, show 4 CPU core histories, collapsing the (useless) virtual CPU cores into its real and virtual sum.

This 4-core 2017 iMac 5K is overloaded: 400% is full CPU utilization and it is well beyond that (4 more virtual cores)

CLICK TO VIEW: Configuring my 2017 iMac 5K and Various

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro
Only $1799 $1149

8GB / 256GB SSD / 2.3 Ghz Intel Core i5

Apple Refurbished Factory Sealed
Apple 1 Year Limited Warranty
Awesome for a student!

Save the tax, we pay you back, instantly!
View all handpicked deals...

Samsung 2TB T5 Portable Solid-State Drive (Black)
$390 $270
SAVE $120 | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2019 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__