All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: diglloyd.com photography and WindInMyFace.com

Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
Amazon
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Up to 1527MB/s sustained performance
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$4499 $2999
SAVE $1500

$799 $499
SAVE $300

$100 $100
SAVE $click

$2198 $1798
SAVE $400

$130 $100
SAVE $30

$3498 $2998
SAVE $500

$2999 $1699
SAVE $1300

$2397 $2197
SAVE $200

$1697 $1297
SAVE $400

$2998 $2898
SAVE $100

$2198 $1798
SAVE $400

$190 $161
SAVE $28

$580 $410
SAVE $170

$2997 $2697
SAVE $300

$1799 $1599
SAVE $200

$2198 $1998
SAVE $200

OWC

Best Deals of the Year!


Promo code BFCM2021 good thru Nov 29
Check for new deals daily!

TESTED: 2017 iMac 5K SSD Speed vs 2015 iMac 5K (Surprising Finding)

View iMac 5K at B&H Photo and see also MPG’s computer gear wishlist. Not sure which Mac to get or how to configure it? Consult with MPG.

See the MPG review of the 2017 iMac 5K.

In a classic case of not assuming too much, MPG tested the 2017 iMac 5K SSD speed. Apple likes to quote peak speeds, but all is not well for the vast majority of applications, which perform the bulk of their disk I/O in 1MB or smaller chunks—even Photoshop CC 2017 (so far at least),

Read more: iMac 5K (June 2017): Flash Drive (SSD)

The late 2015 iMac 5K SSD outperforms the 2017 iMac 5K for the critically important transfer sizes up to 1MB, particularly for writes, where the 2017 model lags badly. Many if not most programs do not read or write data in chunks larger than 1MB, so these results mean that the 2017 iMac 5K will be significantly slower than the 2015 iMac 5K whenever small files or I/O sizes are involved.

Reading a mix of 217000 files of varying sizes (html files and JPEG) shows that the performance is slightly in favor of the 2015 iMac 5K with a mix of text files and large JPEGs, but about 40% faster on the 2015 iMac 5K with small files (html files of a few kilobytes). This argues that things like file copying, or searching/grepping, git, etc will be faster on the 2015 model. Thus the 2017 iMac 5K is substantially slower for everyday tasks that involve intensive I/O with smaller reads, in spite of the 40% greater speed for large reads.

Real world speeds through the file system using diglloydTools DiskTester.
disktester run-sequential-suite

Flash Drive (SSD) Sustained Transfer Speed for larger transfers
2017 iMac 5K vs 2015 iMac 5K

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__