All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: diglloyd.com photography and WindInMyFace.com
Thank you for purchasing through links and ads on this site.
OWC / MacSales.com...
diglloyd B&H Deal Finder...
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
Capacities up to 56TB and speeds up to 1527MB/s
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$200 $170
SAVE $30

$309 $249
SAVE $60

$1319 $1234
SAVE $85

$1799 $1299
SAVE $500

$100 $40
SAVE $60

$284 $284
SAVE $click

$147 $80
SAVE $67

$250 $230
SAVE $20

$3899 $3599
SAVE $300

$2799 $2499
SAVE $300

$1450 $900
SAVE $550

$1199 $999
SAVE $200

$5699 $4699
SAVE $1000

$1799 $1379
SAVE $420

$2999 $2399
SAVE $600

$18599 $17099
SAVE $1500

$600 $400
SAVE $200

$299 $199
SAVE $100

$1149 $799
SAVE $350

$1499 $1049
SAVE $450

$1799 $1379
SAVE $420

$1399 $1049
SAVE $350

$150 $50
SAVE $100

$380 $340
SAVE $40

$370 $330
SAVE $40

$420 $170
SAVE $250

$1499 $699
SAVE $800

$1499 $699
SAVE $800

$420 $170
SAVE $250

$369 $200
SAVE $169

$1699 $1399
SAVE $300

$1498 $998
SAVE $500

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1099 $999
SAVE $100

Save Big $$$$ on Memory for 2019 Mac Pro

Up to 65% better pricing than Apple

Lloyd recommends 32GB RDIMM modules for most users (more expensive LRDIMMS are for 512GB or more).


Adobe Photoshop CC and CPU Cores: Does not Scale For Common Operations

Choose the best number of CPU cores for your actual work: 2013 Mac Pro: How Many CPU Cores for Your Workflow?

Don’t decide on CPU cores based on Photoshop CC alone unless that is your (only) usage. Some programs offer better scalability.

Scalability

It appeared that Adobe Photoshop CC was using my 12-core Mac Pro really well based on CPU usage, which was exciting. I thought that perhaps Adobe had made some progress and/or that OS X Mavericks had improved matters. But I was fooled by CPU usage, which is indicative but not definitive of getting useful work done.

I spent some careful hours measuring the actual performance, and it turns out that the CPU usage is mostly overhead busy-work (thread contention), not useful computation.

What matters is not CPU utilization, but useful work finished: do more cores get the work done faster?

For example, if a task takes 30 seconds with 6 CPU cores, we would like it to finish in ~15 seconds with 12 cores (perfect scalability), or at least something like ~18 seconds which would still be a large improvement. But Photoshop CC falls short of even that reduced goal, as the asymptotic curves make plain.

What is the cause? It could be memory bandwidth, in which case the 2013 Mac Pro will offer better relative performance in 8/10/12 core range versus 6 cores. How much better is unclear until testing can be done. Or it could be synchronization overhead, which is a function of both the problem space and the code design quality (efficiency)—unfixable except by redesign by Adobe if that is the case.

UPDATE: added is a graph with normalized times and theoretical best results.

UPDATE 2: perfect scalability exists with some programs.

2014 Update: Adobe Photoshop CC Scalability

Scalability across CPU cores of Adobe Photoshop CC on 12-core 3.33 GHz 2010 Mac Pro

 

OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.


Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!
OWC Thunderblade Thunderbolt 3 SSD

Blazing fast, up to 16TB.

YEE HAH!



√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!
OWC Envoy Pro EX SSD
Blazingly fast Thunderbolt 3 SSD!

Up to 4TB capacity, USB-C compatible.

USB-C model also available


Great for travel or for desktop!

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo
View all handpicked deals...

Dell P2719H 27" 16:9 IPS Monitor
$309 $249
SAVE $60

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__