All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: photography and
Thank you for purchasing through links and ads on this site.
diglloyd B&H Deal Finder...
Buy other stuff at
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$280 $230
SAVE $50

$100 $100
SAVE $click

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$649 $449
SAVE $200

$7595 $5995
SAVE $1600

$799 $499
SAVE $300

$2598 $2398
SAVE $200

$1498 $1398
SAVE $100

$249 $219
SAVE $30

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$21999 $19999
SAVE $2000

$8399 $7599
SAVE $800

$1149 $799
SAVE $350

$260 $180
SAVE $80

$4998 $3998
SAVE $1000

$569 $519
SAVE $50

$899 $799
SAVE $100

$2347 $1997
SAVE $350

$883 $633
SAVE $250

$1299 $949
SAVE $350

$1636 $1036
SAVE $600

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB

Adobe Photoshop CC and CPU Cores: Does not Scale For Common Operations

Choose the best number of CPU cores for your actual work: 2013 Mac Pro: How Many CPU Cores for Your Workflow?

Don’t decide on CPU cores based on Photoshop CC alone unless that is your (only) usage. Some programs offer better scalability.


It appeared that Adobe Photoshop CC was using my 12-core Mac Pro really well based on CPU usage, which was exciting. I thought that perhaps Adobe had made some progress and/or that OS X Mavericks had improved matters. But I was fooled by CPU usage, which is indicative but not definitive of getting useful work done.

I spent some careful hours measuring the actual performance, and it turns out that the CPU usage is mostly overhead busy-work (thread contention), not useful computation.

What matters is not CPU utilization, but useful work finished: do more cores get the work done faster?

For example, if a task takes 30 seconds with 6 CPU cores, we would like it to finish in ~15 seconds with 12 cores (perfect scalability), or at least something like ~18 seconds which would still be a large improvement. But Photoshop CC falls short of even that reduced goal, as the asymptotic curves make plain.

What is the cause? It could be memory bandwidth, in which case the 2013 Mac Pro will offer better relative performance in 8/10/12 core range versus 6 cores. How much better is unclear until testing can be done. Or it could be synchronization overhead, which is a function of both the problem space and the code design quality (efficiency)—unfixable except by redesign by Adobe if that is the case.

UPDATE: added is a graph with normalized times and theoretical best results.

UPDATE 2: perfect scalability exists with some programs.

2014 Update: Adobe Photoshop CC Scalability

Scalability across CPU cores of Adobe Photoshop CC on 12-core 3.33 GHz 2010 Mac Pro


OWC Envoy Pro EX SSD
Blazingly fast Thunderbolt 3 SSD!

Up to 4TB capacity, USB-C compatible.

USB-C model also available

Great for travel or for desktop!
OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.

Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!
OWC Thunderblade Thunderbolt 3 SSD

Blazing fast, up to 16TB.


√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!

Deals Updated Daily at B&H Photo
View all handpicked deals...

SanDisk 256GB Extreme PRO UHS-I SDXC Memory Card
$100 $100
SAVE $click | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__