Links on this site earn me fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases @AMAZON

Consult with Lloyd: cameras, computers, backup, etc...
Lloyd’s Patreon
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
Connect and charge all of your devices through a single Thunderbolt or USB-C port.

Mac Pro Westmere Estimating CPU Performance

2010-08-21 • SEND FEEDBACK
Related: CPU cores, Mac Pro, Macs

CPU performance is dependent on many factors:

  • The software has a profound influence— software can be single-threaded, or it can use all available CPU cores (rare). See my scorecard.
  • Memory speed and amount, caching, etc;
  • The technical nature of the computation (eg pure computation, lots of conditional branches, amount of memory access, etc).
  • Drive speed — tasks that involve the drive will stall the CPU. A fast SSD is in order for such tasks.
  • Configuration — a very few programs are configurable as to how much computing power they use.

My estimations of real-world performance are based on my extensive research over many years with a variety of software and hardware.

The graphs below are illustrative of what can be expected in various real-world scenarios. They are not measurements of specific software or tasks.

Murphy’s Law performance

Murphy’s Law says that the software you use will disappoint: it will be single-threaded, or at best use ~2–3 CPU cores instead of those 4/6/8/12 cores you paid for!

Most software is not written well enough to exploit multiple CPU cores, or uses unfriendly modal processing (eg Photoshop locks you out while it saves or opens, doesn’t let you disable compression, and then insists on using a single CPU core out of the 4/6/8/12 available).

Most software cannot use even 2 cores consistently, let alone 4/6/8/12. Don’t confuse that generality with specific software you might use, or specific tasks within the same application

Note that an iMac 3.6GHz fares rather well in these scenarios: it has a fast clock speed which gives it an advantage for anything that is single-threaded, even over a 8-core or 12-core Mac Pro.

Realistic performance (estimate)

Reasonable expectations for well-written software

This graph is based on running well-written software, meaning that is uses 3-6 CPU cores fairly well. Don’t get your hopes up here, not many programs are well written. Even reasonably well-written software has a hard time using 8 or 12 cores efficiently (utilizing them does not mean utilizing them efficiently in a scalable manner).

What should matter to you is the software you use.

Many photography programs can exploit 3-6 cores for specific operations for short periods of time.This can yield a nice perkiness to certain operations. But don’t expect to see such gains overall.

Realistic performance (estimate)

Best case performance — raw computing potential

You’ll rarely see this in the real world except with special test programs, like MemoryTester.

But a few specialized and very well written programs can come close to these results. If your work involves such program(s), the 12-core machines will have a large positive impact for you.

The reason I call the hexacore 3.33GHz Mac Pro the “sweet spot” should be clear from this graph.

Realistic performance (estimate)

See also

In-depth Review of the March 2009 Mac Pro Nehalem.

Mac Pro Nehalem Shootout


View all handpicked deals...

Nanuk 925 Waterproof Hard Case Pro Photo/Video Kit with Padded Dividers and Lid Organizer (Black)
$285 $214
SAVE $71 | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds |
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__