↝ OWC / MacSales.com... ↜
↝ diglloyd Deal Finder... ↜
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
Or iMac 5K or iMac Pro?
Consult with Lloyd ASAP before buying!
System configuration for CPU, GPU, memory, SSD, backup, RAID, optimizing performance, workflow.
For YOUR optimal workflow
Avoid costly mistakes in throwing money at the problem for less performance and/or buying the wrong machine for your own needs!
Remote screen sharing available for RAID, software configuration, etc.
More about 2019 Mac Pro vs iMac 5K vs iMac Pro...
2019 Mac Pro: Focus Stacking with Zerene Stacker, 28 X 45-Megapixel Nikon D850 TIF
Related: 2019 iMac 5K, 2019 Mac Pro, 4K and 5K displays, computer display, CPU cores, focus stacking, GPU, iMac, iMac 5K, Mac Pro, Macs, memory, Nikon D850, SSD, video, Zerene Stacker
MPG tested the $9399 Apple 2019 Mac Pro with 384GB OWC memory vs the top-end $3849 2019 iMac 5K 3.6 GHz Intel Core i9 8-core / Vega 48 with 128GB OWC memory. The memory difference is not a factor in this test.
The support of OWC / MacSales.com and B&H Photo is essential for making these reviews possible. Please order through our links via these companies and/or subscribe to diglloyd publications. Mac wish list • Storage wish list • SSD wish list • Ports wish list
Not sure which Mac to get or how to configure it? Consult with MPG Lloyd.
Results: Zerene Stacker focus stacking 28 Nikon D850 images
Zerene Stacker settings: Use External TIFF Reader disabled. Memory settings ample.
Using compressed TIF files will exact about a 20% performance penalty. This test uses uncompressed TIF files.
An estimated time is shown for a 24-core Mac Pro, which is a likely best case.
See the CPU and GPU performance analysis that follows.
The GPU is not used.
CPU utilization is excellent if and only if uncompressed TIF is used. Using compressed TIF impairs performance only a little on an 8-core iMac 5K, but exacts about a 20% speed hit on a 16-core Mac Pro. The requirements for optimal performance are:
- Store the input files on the fastest drive available (fast SSD) so that delays from I/O are minimized.
- Use uncompressed TIF. JPEG is probably OK, but it also is compressed which will have a slight negative effect.
- Disable (make sure it is unchecked).
CPU utilization with uncompressed TIF
CPU utilization with uncompressed TIF drops runtime from 250 seconds to 210 seconds on the 16-core Mac Pro, a 16% reduction in runtime (a 19% longer runtime with compressed TIF). With a 24/28-core Mac Pro, using uncompressed TIF on a fast SSD will be even more important.
CPU utilization with compressed TIF
Below, CPU usage when using compressed TIF, is notably less good. This is due to Zerene Stacker (being written in Java), needed to exec a native process to decompress the compressed TIF file and of course, the decompression itself.
$5000 SAVE $1000 = 16.0% OWC 768GB (12 x 64GB) PC23400 DDR4 ECC 2933MHz 288-pin LRDIMM Me… in All Other Categories
$3580 SAVE $420 = 10.0% OWC 512GB (8 x 64GB) PC23400 DDR4 ECC 2933MHz 288-pin LRDIMM Mem… in All Other Categories
$2730 SAVE $270 = 8.0% OWC 384GB (6 x 64GB) PC23400 DDR4 ECC 2933MHz 288-pin LRDIMM Mem… in All Other Categories
$1830 SAVE $170 = 8.0% OWC 256GB (4 x 64GB) PC23400 DDR4 ECC 2933MHz 288-pin LRDIMM Mem… in All Other Categories
$930 SAVE $70 = 6.0% OWC 128GB (2 x 64GB) PC23400 DDR4 ECC 2933MHz 288-pin LRDIMM Mem… in All Other Categories
Up to 65% better pricing than Apple
Lloyd recommends 32GB RDIMM modules for most users (more expensive LRDIMMS are for 512GB or more).