diglloyd
Mac Performance Guide

Up to 2.0TB of Portable, High-Performance, Bus-Powered Capacity
Extreme reliability and performance. Delivered.
Our premium upgrade service provides peace of mind.
MPG Photo Workstation MPG Pro Laptop

100% Kona, 100% Family Owned

WindInMyFace.com — Bicycling blog, gear, rides, training, nutrition

Are you a photographer?

Don’t miss all the great articles, news and analysis at

diglloyd.com
diglloyd.com

Saturday, November 06, 2010

Reader comment: Mac Pro or iMac?

Reader Hendrik P writes:

I'm a 3D artist and designer from Germany. I wasn't sure if I should get a iMac i7 or the pricier MacPro. I went for the 6-core 3,33 GHz MacPro and I’m so glad I did.

As you recommended, I bought 2 of the insanely fast OWC SSDs for my system. This brought me tenfold speed in terms of rendering in AfterEffects or Cinema 4D (my old machine is a 2009 MacBook Pro 2,26 GHz Core 2 Duo).

Your blog and your great tips helped A LOT in making the right decision. Especially your very in-depth review of the MacPro (vs. iMac i7). The remark about the exchangeable internal drives was the turning point. If you rely on your computer for a living, it has to work, and if it doesn't it shouldn't take long to get it up and running again.

Thanks a million!

DIGLLOYD: smart move. The Mac Pro is a hugely better value, and while the iMac quad-core is a fine machine for what it is, it’s extremely limited for serious work where speed and reliability for drives and backup come into play, not to mention a 16GB memory limit. It’s a dead-end Mac when those things are considered carefully, which is not to say it’s no good, just that I definitely would not build a business on it. See my in-depth comments.


Up to 16TB of Storage!

diglloyd Home Page | Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008-2013 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved. | Contact | Newsletter + Alerts